Showing posts with label Corruption. Show all posts

Swine Flu & COVID: The Vaccine Mistakes Repeated

Why This Isn’t Academic for Me

I don’t write about vaccine policy, medical ethics, or institutional failure from a place of abstraction. I write about it because these systems have touched—and ended—the lives of people in my family.

In 1976, my grandfather took the swine flu vaccine during the nationwide rollout. Two weeks later, he died. Like many families at the time, we were told it was coincidence, unfortunate timing, and ultimately unknowable. The vaccination program itself was later halted, but there was no meaningful reckoning for those already affected. The questions our family had were never answered—only deferred.

Nearly fifty years later, history felt impossible to ignore.

My father was living in a nursing home when he received multiple COVID vaccinations along with a flu shot. Within months, his health deteriorated rapidly. He developed serious nervous system and mobility issues, declined quickly, and died within six months.

As with my grandfather, there was no clear investigation, no transparent discussion of risk, and no institutional willingness to even entertain the possibility that medical intervention might have played a role. What we encountered instead was silence, procedural deflection, and a familiar insistence that correlation must not be discussed—let alone examined.

I am not claiming certainty. I am not claiming intent. I am not claiming that every adverse outcome is caused by vaccination.

What I am claiming is this:
When medical systems discourage questioning, shield themselves from liability, and treat uncertainty as a threat rather than a reality, families like mine are left without answers—twice, across two generations.

That is why the comparison between the 1976 swine flu vaccination program and the COVID response is not theoretical to me. It is lived history. It is personal loss repeated under different circumstances, by the same kinds of institutional failures.

Coronafraud.com exists because institutions rarely document their own mistakes honestly—especially when doing so carries legal, financial, or reputational risk. When that happens, memory fades, records are sanitized, and families are left to piece together what happened on their own.

This work is not driven by anger.

It is driven by responsibility—to remember, to question, and to insist that “public health” never again mean unaccountable power over private lives.

Introduction: Two Crises, One Institutional Pattern

Public health rarely gets a clean second chance. When it does, the expectation is that past failures inform future decisions. Yet the COVID vaccine rollout revealed something troubling: the lessons of the 1976 swine flu vaccination program were not just forgotten—they were structurally ignored.

In 1976, the U.S. rushed a nationwide vaccination campaign in response to a feared pandemic that never materialized. Adverse events emerged, public trust collapsed, and the program was halted. It was later studied as a textbook example of how panic, politics, and liability distortion can override scientific caution.

Nearly fifty years later, during COVID, the same institutional dynamics reappeared—this time globally, digitally amplified, and backed by unprecedented financial and political power.

This article examines how swine flu and COVID are connected not by biology, but by governance failure.

1. Pandemic Prediction vs. Pandemic Reality

The 1976 swine flu episode began at Fort Dix, where a novel influenza strain infected soldiers. One death triggered fears of a replay of the 1918 Spanish Flu.

Public health leaders chose preemption over observation.

COVID followed a similar arc:

Early models projected catastrophic outcomes
Worst-case scenarios dominated decision-making
Policy hardened before long-term data existed

In both cases, projection replaced proportion, and uncertainty was treated as unacceptable rather than inevitable.

2. Political Urgency as a Substitute for Scientific Restraint

In 1976, the vaccination program carried the direct backing of Gerald Ford. The political risk of being wrong was perceived as lower than the political risk of appearing inactive.

During COVID, the same calculus played out globally:

Speed became proof of leadership
Questioning timelines was framed as sabotage
Policy reversals were delayed to preserve authority

Public health shifted from risk management to reputational defense.

3. Liability Shields: The Incentive That Never Changed

One of the clearest parallels between swine flu and COVID is who carried the risk.

1976 Swine Flu

Manufacturers refused participation without immunity. The federal government absorbed liability. When injuries surfaced, taxpayers paid.

COVID

Pharmaceutical companies again received broad liability protection. Compensation systems were narrow, slow, and opaque.

This design flaw matters because immunity from consequences alters behavior. When downside risk is removed, speed and scale are rewarded over caution and transparency.

4. Adverse Events: Dismissal First, Acknowledgment Later

The 1976 program unraveled after increased cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome appeared among recipients. Initial responses downplayed the signal. Only sustained evidence forced action.

COVID followed a similar trajectory:

Early myocarditis and clotting signals were minimized
Surveillance systems were criticized yet relied upon
Public acknowledgment lagged independent analysis

The problem was not that adverse events existed.
It was that institutions resisted seeing them.

5. Messaging Failure: Certainty Over Credibility

After swine flu, public confidence in health authorities suffered for decades. One reason was messaging that allowed no room for error.

COVID repeated that mistake:

“Safe and effective” became an absolute claim
Uncertainty was treated as a threat
Policy changes eroded earlier assurances

History shows that overconfidence destroys trust faster than bad outcomes.

6. One-Size-Fits-All Policy, Twice

In 1976, vaccination was broadly recommended despite uneven risk.

During COVID, mandates extended to:

Young adults
Children
Previously infected individuals

Risk stratification came late, if at all. Public health favored compliance simplicity over biological nuance—a tradeoff that proved costly.

7. Dissent Was Managed, Not Integrated

Post-1976 reviews revealed internal disagreement that never meaningfully slowed the program.

During COVID, dissent moved into the open—and was actively suppressed. Doctors and researchers questioning mandates, timelines, or transparency were censored, deplatformed, or professionally sanctioned.

Healthy systems absorb criticism. Fragile ones silence it.

8. The Defining Difference: Knowing When to Stop

Here is where the two crises diverge sharply:

1976: The vaccination program was halted once harm became undeniable.
COVID: Programs expanded—boosters, mandates, passports—even as risk profiles shifted.

That single difference explains why COVID remains unresolved socially, politically, and psychologically.

Stopping requires humility.
Expansion requires certainty.

9. Why the Lesson Was Lost

The swine flu failure should have reshaped public health permanently. It didn’t, because:

Institutional memory faded
Financial incentives grew
Media rewarded certainty
Bureaucracies optimized for scale

What was once a warning became a footnote.

10. Swine Flu Was the Dress Rehearsal. COVID Was the Main Event.

The 1976 swine flu vaccine program was not a conspiracy. Neither was COVID.

Both were system failures—driven by fear, insulated by liability shields, and protected by institutional defensiveness.

The tragedy is not that mistakes were made.
It’s that they were made again, despite a clear historical precedent.

If public health wants trust restored, it must do what it avoided in both eras:

Admit uncertainty
Accept accountability
Protect dissent
Learn publicly

Otherwise, the next crisis will look familiar—because the system that created it never changed.

Medical Corruption at Industrial Scale: COVID Vaccine Fallout

Introduction: A Question That Refuses to Go Away

Few questions provoke more anger—or more fear—than this one: Were the COVID vaccines genocide?
It’s a question increasingly asked not only by activists on the fringes, but by ordinary people who watched institutions contradict themselves, silence critics, and later revise “settled science.” Did we not learn anything from the Swine Flu vaccine in 1976?

The answer matters, because how we classify what happened during COVID determines whether the world learns from it—or repeats it.

This article does not argue that a secret cabal plotted mass extermination. It does argue that the COVID vaccine rollout exposed medical corruption at industrial scale—a convergence of corporate profit, regulatory capture, censorship, and moral failure that caused preventable harm and shattered public trust.

1. Genocide Requires Intent — Corruption Requires Opportunity

Under international law, genocide requires intent: a coordinated effort to destroy a population group.

There is no documented evidence that world governments or pharmaceutical companies organized mRNA vaccination campaigns with explicit intent to kill.

However, focusing solely on intent can be misleading.

History shows that catastrophic harm often results not from hatred, but from:

What occurred during COVID aligns far more closely with systemic corruption than with classic genocide—yet the human cost remains severe.

2. Regulatory Capture: When Watchdogs Become Partners

The modern pharmaceutical system depends on regulators acting independently. During COVID, that independence was widely questioned.

Agencies such as the FDA and CDC were tasked with evaluating products from corporations like Pfizer and Moderna—the same corporations receiving unprecedented public funding and liability shields.

Key concerns raised by critics included:

Emergency Use Authorization based on short trial windows
Delayed or redacted release of raw clinical trial data
Revolving doors between regulators and industry
Limited public debate over alternative risk-benefit profiles by age and sex

This dynamic is known as regulatory capture—when agencies serve industry interests as much as, or more than, public welfare.

3. Censorship and the Collapse of Scientific Debate

Science advances through disagreement. COVID policy advanced through enforcement.

Doctors, epidemiologists, and statisticians who questioned:

Mandates for low-risk populations
Natural immunity comparisons
Long-term safety surveillance
One-size-fits-all policies

were often labeled “misinformation” and removed from platforms, journals, or professional positions.

Social media companies worked directly with governments to suppress dissenting views—many of which later proved partially or fully correct.

This environment didn’t eliminate bad science.
It eliminated peer review in real time.

4. Post-Rollout Signals That Couldn’t Be Ignored

As mass vaccination campaigns expanded globally, new data emerged that deserved transparent analysis—yet often received dismissal instead.

a) Excess Mortality

Several countries reported all-cause mortality spikes that did not correlate neatly with COVID waves. While causation remains contested, the signals warranted open investigation rather than reflexive denial.

b) Cardiac Events

Myocarditis and pericarditis—particularly among young males—were eventually acknowledged by regulators after initial minimization. Risk levels remain debated, but the delay in acknowledgment eroded trust.

c) Reproductive and Menstrual Effects

Menstrual irregularities, fertility concerns, and pregnancy questions were initially brushed aside, then later recognized as real and statistically observable—though generally described as temporary.

d) Underreporting Systems

Systems like VAERS were publicly labeled unreliable while simultaneously serving as official safety monitoring tools—creating confusion and skepticism.

None of this proves malicious intent.
All of it proves institutional defensiveness.

5. Liability Shields and the Moral Hazard Problem

Pharmaceutical companies received:

Guaranteed government purchase contracts
Immunity from standard product liability lawsuits
Accelerated approval pathways

This created a moral hazard: massive upside with minimal downside.

When harm occurs in such systems, accountability becomes diffuse:

Companies blame regulators
Regulators cite emergency conditions
Politicians claim expert reliance

The result is a vacuum where no one is responsible—even when lives are lost.

6. Genocide vs. Crimes Against Humanity: A Moral Distinction

Calling the COVID vaccine rollout “genocide” may be legally inaccurate—but dismissing the outrage behind the word misses the point.

Under the spirit of post-World War II medical ethics, particularly the Nuremberg Code, several red flags emerged:

Coercion through mandates
Lack of long-term safety data
Suppression of informed consent discussion
Punishment of dissenting physicians

When populations are pressured into medical interventions under threat of job loss, travel bans, or social exclusion—without transparent risk disclosure—the moral line is crossed.

Not into genocide.
But into systemic ethical failure.

7. Why Trust Collapsed — and Why It Matters

Public health depends on credibility. Once lost, it is extraordinarily difficult to rebuild.

COVID taught millions of people that:

“Safe and effective” can change definitions
“Follow the science” can mean “follow authority”
Dissent can be punished even when evidence evolves

This erosion of trust now affects:

Childhood vaccination programs
Emergency preparedness
Future pandemic response
Faith in medical institutions overall

Ironically, the suppression meant to “protect confidence” destroyed it.

8. What Should Have Happened Instead

A non-corrupt response would have included:

Transparent release of trial and safety data
Age-stratified and risk-based recommendations
Protection—not punishment—of scientific dissent
Honest acknowledgment of uncertainty
Clear separation between regulators and industry

None of that required perfect foresight.
It required humility.

Conclusion: Not Genocide — But Something Almost as Dangerous

So, were the COVID vaccines genocide?

No—not by legal definition or proven intent.

But were they part of an unprecedented episode of medical corruption at industrial scale?

Yes.

When profit-driven institutions override transparency, suppress debate, and evade accountability—millions can be harmed without anyone ever saying “kill.”

History does not judge systems by their press releases.
It judges them by outcomes—and by whether lessons were learned.

If this moment is memory-holed instead of examined, the next crisis will not be safer.

It will simply be quieter—until it isn’t.

Government-Created Disasters: A Century of Self-Inflicted Wounds

Introduction: When Power Turns Against the People

Over the past hundred years, humanity has faced war, disease, and economic collapse—but not all these catastrophes were acts of fate. Many were created, worsened, or prolonged by the very governments entrusted to prevent them. Behind every “crisis,” there often lies a chain of political missteps, corruption, and short-term decisions that caused far more damage than any natural disaster could.

This is a look at ten government-created disasters—each one a case study in how arrogance, bureaucracy, and ideology can turn leadership into liability.

1. COVID-19 Pandemic (2020–2022)

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the dangers of political dysfunction in real time. From conflicting public-health messages to chaotic vaccine rollouts, governments across the world failed to coordinate a unified response.

In the United States, early denial and partisan squabbling cost lives and livelihoods. Lockdowns were applied inconsistently; billions were misallocated; and misinformation spread faster than the virus itself. Small businesses collapsed, inflation spiked, and national trust in institutions plummeted.

More than 6.9 million people died globally, but the true toll went beyond mortality. The pandemic demonstrated how bureaucracy and politics could turn a medical emergency into a social and economic implosion.

2. The 2008 Financial Crisis

The 2008 meltdown was a man-made catastrophe fueled by decades of deregulation and government-backed speculation. Politicians encouraged subprime lending to expand homeownership, while Wall Street bundled bad debt into profitable illusions.

When the housing bubble burst, it wiped out trillions in global wealth. Millions lost jobs, homes, and savings, while those responsible were bailed out. The U.S. government rescued the same institutions that caused the collapse—rewarding recklessness and cementing the idea that some corporations were “too big to fail.”

The aftermath reshaped politics and widened the wealth gap for a generation.

3. The Vietnam War (1955–1975)

Born from Cold War paranoia, the Vietnam War was one of America’s most costly political blunders. Based on the “domino theory” and misinformation, U.S. leaders escalated a regional conflict into a full-scale war that claimed over 58,000 American lives and millions more Vietnamese.

Leaked Pentagon Papers later revealed that officials knew the war was unwinnable long before they admitted it. The result was a shattered nation, global distrust in U.S. leadership, and deep domestic division that lingers decades later.

4. The Iraq War and Weapons of Mass Destruction (2003–2011)

In 2003, the U.S. government invaded Iraq under the false pretense that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. Intelligence was distorted, dissent was ignored, and the war became a geopolitical catastrophe.

The invasion toppled a dictator but destabilized an entire region, cost $2 trillion, and resulted in over 250,000 deaths. The power vacuum led directly to the rise of ISIS and the longest era of Middle East instability in modern history.

This disaster showed how misinformation and political hubris can create chaos lasting generations.

5. The 1970s Energy Crisis

The 1973 oil embargo exposed the consequences of decades of poor energy planning. U.S. policymakers had ignored warnings about dependence on foreign oil, allowing an embargo by OPEC to paralyze the economy.

Fuel shortages, mile-long gas lines, and double-digit inflation followed. Instead of long-term reform, leaders resorted to rationing and blame-shifting. The crisis cost over $1.5 trillion and reshaped global energy politics.

It wasn’t a natural supply problem—it was a political one, created by complacency and shortsighted energy policy.

6. Hurricane Katrina Response (2005)

Hurricane Katrina revealed how bureaucracy kills. The storm itself was a natural event, but the disaster that followed was the direct result of government failure.

Federal, state, and local officials ignored years of warnings about levee vulnerability. When the storm hit, coordination broke down completely. FEMA was slow, underfunded, and unprepared. Thousands were stranded for days in New Orleans, and over 1,200 people died.

The aftermath exposed racial and economic inequities, turning Katrina from a weather event into a moral indictment of America’s disaster-response system.

7. Repeated Government Shutdowns (1995 – 2025)

Few acts of self-sabotage better symbolize dysfunction than government shutdowns. Triggered by Congress’s failure to agree on budgets, these shutdowns paralyze federal agencies and punish the public for political stalemates.

During the 2025 shutdown, air travel was crippled, safety inspections halted, and thousands of workers went unpaid. It wasn’t about saving money—it was about power. Each side used the shutdown to score political points while the country suffered.

The cumulative cost of these shutdowns over the past three decades exceeds $90 billion, and the damage to public trust is immeasurable.

8. The Watergate Scandal (1972–1974)

President Richard Nixon’s abuse of power during Watergate remains one of the darkest stains on U.S. democracy. What began as a political break-in evolved into a full-blown constitutional crisis, exposing illegal surveillance, bribery, and obstruction of justice.

Nixon’s resignation in 1974 marked the first time a U.S. president was forced from office. Watergate didn’t just end a presidency—it ended Americans’ blind trust in government.

It proved that corruption, left unchecked, could nearly destroy the very system it governs.

9. The Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster (1986)

When the Challenger exploded seconds after liftoff, killing all seven crew members, the tragedy was immediately traced to managerial failure inside NASA. Engineers had warned that cold weather could compromise the shuttle’s O-rings, but leaders—pressured by politics and media expectations—launched anyway.

The subsequent investigation concluded it wasn’t a technical failure but a “failure of decision-making.” The government’s rush to maintain appearances overrode science and safety, turning innovation into tragedy.

10. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (1932–1972)

Perhaps no event so starkly illustrates government cruelty as the Tuskegee Study. For 40 years, the U.S. Public Health Service intentionally withheld treatment from hundreds of African American men with syphilis, even after penicillin became available.

The victims were lied to, studied, and left to die—all in the name of “research.” When exposed, the scandal shocked the nation and permanently eroded trust between minority communities and public health institutions.

This dark chapter led to modern bioethics laws, but the damage to human dignity can never be undone.

The Cost of Mismanagement: A Century of Lessons

Disaster	Years	Estimated Deaths	Economic Cost	Core Government Failure
COVID-19 Pandemic	2020–2022	6.9 M	$16 Trillion	Poor coordination, political infighting
2008 Financial Crisis	2007–2009	8.7 M (job losses)	$12 Trillion	Deregulation, bailout bias
Vietnam War	1955–1975	5 M	$4 Trillion	Misinformation, political ego
Iraq War & WMDs	2003–2011	250,000 +	$2 Trillion	False intelligence, overreach
1970s Energy Crisis	1973–1980	200,000 +	$1.5 Trillion	Policy failure, dependency
Hurricane Katrina	2005	1,200	$108 Billion	Incompetence, lack of coordination
Government Shutdowns	Multiple Years	N/A	$90 Billion	Partisan gridlock
Watergate Scandal	1972–1974	N/A	$25 Billion	Abuse of power
Challenger Disaster	1986	7	$1.1 Billion	Bureaucratic denial
Tuskegee Experiment	1932–1972	N/A	Unknown	Ethical corruption

Conclusion: The Real Enemy Within

Every one of these events underscores a painful truth: government disasters are rarely accidents—they’re symptoms of arrogance, denial, and misplaced priorities. When leaders put politics above people, ideology above evidence, and ego above accountability, the result is tragedy.

From Tuskegee to COVID-19, from Vietnam to the financial crash, history repeats itself because politicians refuse to learn from the damage they cause. The lesson of the past century is clear: our greatest threats are not always external—they are self-inflicted wounds born of human power, pride, and neglect.

10 Things We Learned from the Overreaction to the Coronavirus Pandemic?

The coronavirus pandemic was a global crisis that prompted significant responses from governments, health organizations, and individuals. However, as the dust settles, it’s crucial to examine what we learned from the instances of overreaction during this period. Understanding these lessons can help us prepare better for future emergencies and strike a balance between caution and overreach.

Long Covid Action Project - End The Disease That Was Created In A Lab

17,000 Physicians and Medical Scientists Address Crimes Against Humanity

The time is now. As most readers of this substack are now well aware, this is not just about COVID. The Constitution hangs in the balance. Please help us to get these messages spread far and wide. The 17,000 Physicians and Medical Scientists in our organization, who are not financially conflicted and remain committed to the Hippocratic Oath, are doing our part. Now we ask that you help us to help you. We need your help.

Jordan Trishton Walker - Pfizer Director of R&D - Strategy Operations & mRNA Scientific Planning

Pfizer Exposed For Exploring "Mutating" COVID-19 Virus For New Vaccines Via 'Directed Evolution'

Sign Petition FDA Needs To Investigate Pfizer's Clinical Trial Fraud Allegations

Should the FDA investigate Pfizer's clinical trial fraud allegations? Or look the other way?

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Monday tested positive for Covid-19 again.

Trudeau visited the United States last week and just met with Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom and others.

Mr. Trudeau attended the Summit for the Americas in Los Angeles and took a “family photo” with Joe Biden and other political leaders.

PM Trudeau said he’s feeling okay because he’s triple vaxxed and encouraged others to get vaccinated.

Makes sense.

“I’ve tested positive for COVID-19. I’ll be following public health guidelines and isolating. I feel okay, but that’s because I got my shots. So, if you haven’t, get vaccinated – and if you can, get boosted. Let’s protect our healthcare system, each other, and ourselves.” Trudeau said on Monday.

I’ve tested positive for COVID-19. I’ll be following public health guidelines and isolating. I feel okay, but that’s because I got my shots. So, if you haven’t, get vaccinated - and if you can, get boosted. Let’s protect our healthcare system, each other, and ourselves.
— Justin Trudeau (@JustinTrudeau) June 13, 2022

Was Mass Vaccinating in the Public’s Interest or Pfizer’s?

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Reports $37B COVID Vaccine Sales in 2021

Pfizer reported global sales and alliance revenue from its abortion-tainted COVID vaccine brought in $36.78 billion in 2021, helping to more than double profits across its business operations compared with 2020.

In an earnings report issued Tuesday, the pharmaceutical giant also estimated that sales of its vaccine and anti-viral pill will top $54 billion in 2022, buoying shareholders’ hopes that profits at the company might soar for the second year in a row.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said the company plans to aggressively expand the use of messenger RNA beyond just COVID vaccines, pointing to potential treatments of muscle, the liver and nervous system, despite warnings from many researchers that the use of mRNA technology carries significant risks.

Despite record earnings, Pfizer shares fell 3% yesterday on Wall Street due to lower than expected 2022 sales forecasts for its anti-viral pill, Paxlovid, which it sells at $530 a course in the United States.

Anti-viral pills like ivermectin, which health chiefs have sought to ban or restrict, typically sell for a few dollars when available, with several scientists suggesting the much-maligned pills are more effective than those produced by Pfizer.

Pfizer said its overall sales in 2022 across the company’s product range could reach $102 billion.

“In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, we committed to use all of the resources and expertise we had at our disposal to help protect populations globally against this deadly virus, as well as to offer treatments to help avoid the worst outcomes when infections do occur,” Bourla said yesterday. “We put billions of dollars of capital on the line in pursuit of those goals, not knowing whether those investments would ever pay off.”

Reacting to the earnings on Twitter, some commentators remarked on how beneficial mass-vaccination programs had been to the company’s balance sheet.

Bourla also said yesterday that Pfizer’s vaccine for the Omicron variant would not be ready for distribution until March, casting further doubt on calls from health officials and mainstream media outlets to vaccinate people now with shots made for previous variants.

Was mass vaccinating in the public’s interest or Pfizer’s? https://t.co/ojPAhfiCNE
— Lisa Boothe (@LisaMarieBoothe) February 8, 2022

The CEO acknowledged that the eradication of COVID is unlikely to be achieved because of mutations and the virus’ global spread, with some scientists previously warning that new vaccines were contributing to the growth of variants.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer vice president and chief scientist for respiratory research, last week called on the media to apologize for their “lies” about vaccine safety as leaked data from the U.S. military indicated a 300% increase in miscarriages in 2021.

Yeadon, who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with the most senior research position in his field, was an author of a submitted petition to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in December 2020 that raised substantial concerns regarding a lack of sufficient testing of the experimental COVID-19 gene-based vaccines before their emergency use authorizations.

With regard to the possibility of the shots endangering the fertility of women, Yeadon and his colleague, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, wrote, “There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case, this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”

Such a possibility would need to be ruled out through standard experimentation before imposing such substances onto the entire population, according to the doctors.

“It’s important to note that none of these gene-based agents had completed what’s called ‘reproductive toxicology,’” Yeadon wrote in his recent statement. “Over a year later, this battery of tests in animals still has not been done. So there was and still is no data package supporting safety in pregnancy or prior to conception.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released data in December showing a total of 965,843 reports of adverse events after COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 10, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The data included a total of 20,244 reports of deaths and 155,506 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same period.

Is the Mexican or US Government More Corrupt From Drug Money?

Dr. Robert Malone explains how Big Pharma influences public health policies implemented by the CDC and FDA on Candace Owens show.

Stockholm Syndrome, Human Psychology, and COVID Lockdowns

Bill Gates has systematically monopolized the global response to infectious disease through non-profits.

RIP "Trusted News Network" & "Fact Checkers" Dying A Slow Death

More than 200 news sites as partners, The Trust Project continues to champion news transparency and accuracy. Translation = we will manipulate the truth to fit our business objectives and narrative.

Massive Private Equity Companies Like Black Rock & Vanguard Control Our World

Watch 51 minutes into this video where Robert Malone discusses this massive investment capital that is driving destructive Government decision-making and big pharma corruption.

Consolidation of capital is no longer constrained by a nation-state. These massive private equity companies now control the World and all they care about is the return on investment. They control all decisions in Government and the Federal Reserve. They have war game tools to train politicians.

We call this Stakeholder Capitalism.

How much capital do BlackRock and Vanguard control?

This was 2013 over 8 years ago!

Few people are as qualified to comment on the course of the COVID pandemic and the mass vaccination campaign as Dr. Malone. In this important interview, he shares his unique and deep insights on matters of critical national and international importance

In an exclusive and explosive one-hour interview with Veronika Kyrylenko of The New American, pioneering mRNA scientist Dr. Robert Malone explains the intensely corrupt workings of the government regulatory bodies that have mismanaged the pandemic, discusses the problems with the vaccine program and delves into potentially explosive and game-changing revelations about the shady origins of the Covid-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China.

Who is Dr. Robert Malone? While working at the Salk Institute in 1988, Dr. Malone discovered important findings about in-vivo and in-vitro RNA transfection. He continued his work on the technology a year later at the biopharma start-up Vical where he conducted additional experiments. According to his bio, “The mRNA, constructs, reagents were developed at the Salk institute and Vical by Dr. Malone.” His research has also included important work on DNA vaccines. In addition to his fundamental work developing mRNA and DNA vaccine technology, Malone is also a medical doctor. According to his bio, Dr. Malone “received his medical training at Northwestern University (MD) and Harvard University (Clinical Research Post Graduate) medical school, and in Pathology at UC Davis."

https://www.rwmalonemd.com/

"Fact Checking" Facebook Sued by John Stossel for Lies

Surprisingly little attention is being paid to a bombshell admission made by the attorneys representing the corporation formerly known as Facebook, Inc., which has now transitioned into Meta Platforms, Inc.

John Stossel is going to have a field day on his social media with this one.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released the first batch of documents related to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine after a federal judge ordered that they must comply with a massive Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that was filed by a government accountability group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.

The esteemed group of more than 30 professors and scientists asked the federal government to share any and all data that factored into the agency’s hasty decision to grant Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine an emergency use authorization (EUA) – which amounts to a trove of over 329,000 documents.

In a shameless effort to bury the information, the FDA challenged the FOIA request in court. After the agency was told that it must turn over the documents, Justice Department lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to allow them an unthinkable 55 years to process the request, saying that they would be able to release just 500 pages a month.

A motion that was also filed by the same group of doctors and scientists is currently pending in federal court that would force the FDA to expedite processing and releasing these documents.

Meanwhile, the FDA still has to comply with the original order to begin turning over documents. Lo and behold, the first release is a bombshell.

According to an official Pfizer document that is titled Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports, in just the first 90 days of the vaccine’s roll out under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were TENS OF THOUSANDS of reported adverse reactions, including OVER 1200 DEATHS.

https://twitter.com/iGNORANTCHiMP/status/1465992238689923081

The report only included adverse events to the vaccine that researchers considered “serious cases,” there were thousands more submissions that were left out of this data.

Any cases deemed “non-serious” would be processed within 90 days, but this report was released before 90 days of Pfizer’s vaccine being available had even passed.

This is criminal! Am I reading this correctly? 2.9% of adverse effects are recorded as deaths. Why hasn’t this been removed from the market? Other vaccines in development have been discontinued for even a single death in testing.
— Ags Win (@aggiesportsfan) December 2, 2021

“Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, the MAH has prioritised the processing of serious cases, in order to meet expedited regulatory reporting timelines and ensure these reports are available for signal detection and evaluation activity.

Non-serious cases are processed as soon as possible and no later than 90 days from receipt. Pfizer has also taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports.”

In all, the report states that there were a total of 42,086 case reports of individuals who had an adverse reaction to Pfizer’s vaccine worldwide, with the largest number (13,739) coming from the United States and from the UK (13,404).

According to the documents women (29,914) were over 3x more likely to experience a reaction than men (9182). A total of 1223 individuals had a fatal reaction to the experimental Pfizer vaccine.

https://twitter.com/iGNORANTCHiMP/status/1465999494177345537

How did the FDA not immediately pull the experimental jab out of circulation? Let alone grant multiple extensions of the EUA to Pfizer while working with the fraudulent Biden regime to push a needle into the arm of every single American.

The document also makes it clear that the data only includes “recorded adverse events,” which even the author admits is likely just a portion of the true number of adverse reactions that took place.

Again, keep in mind, this is within the first 90 days of the Pfizer jab’s availability.

From the Pfizer document:

“Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown.

Some of the factors that may influence whether an event is reported include: length of time since marketing, market share of the drug, publicity about a drug or an AE, seriousness of the reaction, regulatory actions, awareness by health professionals and consumers of adverse drug event reporting, and litigation.”

Pfizer’s “confidential” Covid-19 vaccine adverse reaction review ends with thousands of conditions that are of “special interest” and could possibly develop after taking their experimental jab. The single-space typed list continues for an astonishing 9 pages.

Yet somehow the paper concludes that the “review of available data” was good enough and demonstrated a “favorable benefit-risk balance” for the rushed vaccine.

What’s the benefit-risk balance on a virus that has a 99.9% recovery rate? The benefit – at least for Pfizer – is clear; It doesn’t matter how many otherwise healthy lives are lost – they are CASHING IN to the tune of $1,000 PER SECOND with a projected $36 BILLION in profit this year from the vaccine alone – it’s criminal.

Smoking gun confidential Pfizer document exposes FDA criminal cover-up of VACCINE DEATHS… they knew the jab was killing people in early 2021… three times more WOMEN than MEN

The full document can be found here.

The FDA clearly agreed with Pfizer, extending the EUA despite the high number of deaths and serious reactions in the short amount of time Pfizer’s jab had been available.

What else are they hiding?

Omicron Variant Used To Cover Up Effects of Covid Vaccines

Government bureaucrats using the Omicron Variant to disguise the rapid increase in sudden and unexplained cardiac deaths in the vaccinated.

Recently the Botswana Government announced that a new variant of Covid had arisen from the Vaccinated. Read More.

One of the symptoms listed of the new Omicron Variant of Coronavirus; includes the following:

A number of heart-related complications may occur, including heart failure, arrhythmias, heart inflammation, and blood clots.

This happens to be one of the primary negative effects of the COVID vaccines among men especially; which has led to a 5-fold increase in sudden and unexplained cardiac deaths in FIFA players in 2021. In fact, since December, 183 professional athletes and coaches have suddenly collapsed, 108 dead.

It looks like bureaucrats are already using the Omicron Variant to disguise the rapid increase in sudden and unexplained cardiac deaths in the vaccinated; just as they did with the Delta Variant.

Some athletes have begun to publicly question the mainstream narrative regarding these sudden cardiac events among the vaccinated.

Second US Omicron Case Is Vaccinated Adult Male Whose "Mild Symptoms" Have Fully Resolved

Not Just Players - Premier League Matches Disrupted By Fans Having 'Medical Emergencies' In The Stands

I’ve been seeing this ‘108 football deaths in 6 months’ figure going around and wondered where it came from.

It’s not mentioned anywhere in the Express link from James and Bev.

So I had a look for it…

1/6 pic.twitter.com/NJwTfMANnb
— Bad Vaccine Takes (@BadVaccineTakes) November 24, 2021

Excess deaths due to the Pfizer jab now proven and replicated/confirmed in the UK.
Look at how many football players are having heart attacks on the field, if you are still doubtful?https://t.co/5axmLdUmY2
— Red Collie (@RedCollie1) November 25, 2021

Fact Checking The Fact Checker Lies & Fake News

Full article comments.

One of the downsides of telling the truth in this environment is that it seems everyone and their brother wants to tear all your arguments to shreds.

I could spend full time just refuting all the hit pieces written about the content I’ve produced. Here’s my fact check of the fact-checkers as a repurposed graphic:

Rather than address every point of every fact check, here is a checklist for things that a thorough fact checker should be able to answer, but can’t or won’t.

Note that this is a quick list I put together in about 30 minutes. There are more, but you get the idea:

What is my motivation for suddenly, at age 65, becoming a spreader of misinformation and conspiracy theories? And why did it only happen right after hearing about my friends who had died or been disabled by the COVID vaccines? Do you even know me or have we ever met?
Dr. Toby Rogers computed 117 deaths per kid saved in ages 5 to 11? Do you agree with his analysis? 20,000 people read that article and couldn’t find a hole. So where did he go wrong and how can be sure you got it right and he got it wrong?
If this is all done out of Kirsch's ego, then how is it that 30 other scientists, statisticians, and doctors all agree with him? Why did all of these people suddenly become conspiracy theorists? What’s their motivation for the fraud and deception?
If the vaccines are safe, how come Alex Berenson also thinks the vaccines are unsafe? Is he also a crackpot? Isn’t it unfair just to attack Kirsch? Berenson and Kirsch hardly ever talk, yet came to the same conclusion. What about Del Bigtree? He found the same thing. In fact, Bigtree’s attorney calculated a VAERS URF of 50 well before Kirsch did. So why pick on Kirsch?
If the fact checker uses a pseudonym, why can’t you tell us what your name is? Are you going to tell us who funded you to do the hit piece?
Will you debate us in a recorded Zoom call where you can answer all our questions? We are eager to find out how we were fooled by all this data.
If the vax is so safe, why are there so many death entries in VAERS this year?
If you think there is simply “over-reporting” in VAERS this year, what is your actual evidence of that? All the people we talked to are reporting more events because there are more events happening. In fact, most people report that there are at least 100X more events this year than in previous years. So it seems like VAERS is actually under-reported this year, and not over-reported, don’t you think?
There are 5,288 symptoms that haven’t been reported for ANY vaccine in the last 5 years that are being reported for the first time in these vaccines. Why?
Why are there more adverse event reports this year than for every vaccine in the last 30 years combined?
If the URF isn't 41, what is the true URF and did you calculate it using the CDC-approved methodology like we did? (see The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome).
If we got it wrong, then tell us: How many people do you estimate have been killed by the COVID vaccines and how do you know?
One of the ways we computed the number of deaths from the vaccine was using an independent polling company. How was that gamed?
Why are athletes dropping by a 60X rate after the vax rollout?
How did Ernest Ramirez's son die?
How do you explain the causes of death of the 14 cases the CDC examined? 5 of them died from cardiac arrest!
How does he explain the results of Peter Schirmacher?
Why did Taiwan report more deaths from the vaccine than from COVID?
Why is the line slope going the wrong way in the Harvard study?
How do you explain that the biodistribution showing accumulation in the ovaries correlate with the high numbers of VAERS symptoms for menstrual problems many with huge elevations compared to baseline (previous vaccines).
Why are cardiologists reporting highly elevated # of cases of heart disease in kids after the vax rolled out?
Why is the cardio testing lab at UCSF now filled with kids 7 to 10 only AFTER the vaccines rolled out for that age range?
Why is a top California neurologist needing to report 2,000 VAERS events this year when in the last 11 years she's never need to report a single adverse event?
How do we explain the families where 3 relatives, all previously healthy, die within days after the COVID shot?
How do we explain Gavin Newsom being diagnosed with GBS within days after his booster? Isn’t it perfectly safe?
How did 2 cricket players recently vaccinated drop on the field within 10 minutes of each other? Bad luck?
Why does the CDC *REFUSE* to calculate and use the proper URF for VAERS when interpreting the safety data? Pfizer PROVED that VAERS is 5X underreported for myocarditis, and the CDC will not even acknowledge that? John Su is using a URF of 1. That is clearly false and misleading. Why are you not going after him? That is truly evil and corrupt. I’m not the bad guy here. This was in plain sight of the public (Pfizer slide with the Optum data (see my article about this).
How come undertakers report a huge increase in business right after the vaccines rolled out?
Why aren't the nursing homes disputing Abrien Aguirre's account that there were 10 times as many deaths from the vaccines than from COVID?
How come the CDC hasn't ascribed even a single death from the vaccines in light of Schirmacher's study? That’s inexplicable isn’t it?
Why are there so many vaccine-injured people that Facebook had to remove groups of 250,000 and more (multiple times).
Why aren't the vaccine injured getting any press?
Why did YouTube censor Dr. Peter Doshi's testimony? UCSF Professor Aditi Bhargava spoke as well and was censored. Why? Are you speaking out about that?
How come Jessica Rose’s myocarditis paper was pulled by the publisher? Are you making a stink about the corruption of science here? Or are you just trying to discredit me?
What about Maddie de Garay? Why didn't the FDA, CDC, or Pfizer ever investigate? Why did Janet Woodcock assure me they would and then did nothing? Why didn't they report the truth and stop the trial on the permanent paralysis. Her result aligns PERFECTLY with the mechanism of action of the drug? How can they have eliminated the vax as the cause without ever talking to her? They are supposed to assume it is the vax until they can show otherwise.
What about the 5X exclusions (vs placebo group) in the Pfizer trial? That can't be by chance can it?
How come there were so few all-cause deaths in the Pfizer study? It was supposed to be a representative group! There should be been around 110 deaths in each group, right?
How come Pfizer 6 months study shows more all cause deaths in the treatment group in than in the placebo group? Where is the PROOF that the vaccines are saving lives? Whoops!!!! No proof at all of a single life saved. As a fact checker, why aren’t you calling that out? Instead you are targetting me. Hmmmm.
Why were there 4X as many cardiac arrests in the vax group vs. placebo in the Pfizer Phase 3 study (6 month)? Seems pretty high. It wasn’t just bad luck since we see all these athletes in plain sight dropping. So isn’t it more likely than not this is real?
Aren’t you concerned that the trials going forward are too underpowered to resolve any of these questions?
Wasn’t there gaming in the Pfizer Phase 3 trials on adverse event reporting where people found it difficult/impossible to report AEs.
Despite the gaming of the AE reports, aren’t you alarmed at the statistically significant large increase in overall morbidity in all of the COVID vaccine trials (the paper US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good… by J. Bart Classen, MD).
How come the NIH and WHO did absolutely nothing when the fluvoxamine Phase 3 trial was published in Lancet? They didn't even note it in the guidelines. Did you protest that? Why not? It’s December 2, 2021 and the fluvoxamine recommendation was Last Updated: April 23, 2021. The Lancet article was widely covered by all major media, but the NIH did nothing. How do you explain that? Why aren’t you spending your valuable time focusing on that?
How come nobody can cite a SINGLE RCT that shows that masks work against COVID?
How come Professor Jeffrey Morris changed the topic whenever we tried to show him that the symptoms in VAERS were dose dependent? (Note: dose dependency is one of the most impressive indicators of causality, but we use all Bradford-Hill criteria to assess causality).
Dr. Steven A. Anderson of the FDA is supposed to be monitoring the VAERS data like a hawk. We have people highly qualified to who have spent months analyzing the VAERS data. Why does Dr. Anderson refuse to meet with us?
How come the FDA and CDC outside committee members all turned down a $1M research grant just to talk to us for a few hours and answer questions? What are they afraid of?
If the CDC and FDA members are independent, why did one of them admit in a private conversation that if they didn’t vote the way the FDA /CDC wanted they would be kicked off the committee like Martin Kulldorff.
If the vaccines are so safe, then why did CDC insiders tip off a friend of mine in January not to get the vaccines?
If the excess deaths in VAERS was not caused by the vaccine, then what is causing it and why isn’t the CDC investigating? These causes of death were not normal.
While it is amusing for people to refer to the Mclachlan VAERS study and argue that all the deaths were normal, that’s simply not what the study said. Shall we go through all 250 cases one by one? The paper said “Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.” So it is interesting that some people can definitively state that the vaccine didn’t cause their death. Are these fact checkers willing to go through the cases one by one with Scott and our team and show us all how we got it wrong?

When you find a “fact check” that addresses those 51 questions, that would be great because I have another 130 questions just like those which I’d love to hear them explain as well.

Debunking Steve Kirsch’s latest claims about covid vaccine deaths

Here is the Medium article. Whoever wrote this “fact check” clearly spent a lot of time putting together his case. Basically, this nameless, faceless person claims that Crawford cherry picked data and that the excess death data doesn’t line up with a deadly vaccine. I just learned about this on Dec 1 at 11pm.

The author says my motivation is ego and fame. Wow. This shows you the quality of his work. Is the author willing to challenge my team in a recorded debate? I seriously doubt it. But I’ve got an open invitation to do just that! Let’s find the truth. We are not afraid of a challenge. Is he? If you are “The Gift of Fire,” then please respond in the comments.

He asks in his title: “What motivates a tech millionaire to fight against covid vaccines?” I’d have a lot more respect for him if was able to get that simple question right. But he can’t even get that one right. Everyone who knows me and works with me will tell you the answer: “Mr. Kirsch just wants to save lives.” I would argue if he can’t get something simple like that out, that we should have a lot less confidence in anything else he says.

So rather than spend our time debunking his debunk, I want to issue a challenge to our anonymous “do gooder.” We’ll address all of your points in your article, if you address all the points above all in a LIVE RECORDED zoom call where we can set the record straight.

How about it?

Healthfeedback fact check

Today, for example, someone sent me this link from the “experts” at healthfeedback.org that fact checked two statements that they claim that I made:

"the ovaries get the highest concentration of [lipid nanoparticles from RNA vaccines]. This turns the ovaries into a very large manufacturing plant to turn out toxic spike protein"
"FDA experts reveal the Covid-19 Vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every 1 life they save"

The short story is the first statement was taken completely out of context and was referring to a chart that was limited to showing the body parts where we did not expect to see any lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivered. The second was a quote from The Expose that I never claimed. It was their mistake, not mine.

If we address the “context problem” of the first one and they mistake by The Expose in the second one, we are left with:

When we look at areas of the body where we didn’t expect to see the LNPs, the ovaries has the highest accumulation.
The VAERS data shows that the vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every life that they might save. It’s not just me that says that. The Walach and Kostoff papers, published in peer reviewed medical journals, say the same thing.

The facts supporting both of these statements are pretty straightforward.