Showing posts with label VAERS. Show all posts

Sign Petition FDA To Investigate Pfizer's Clinical Trial Fraud

Sign Petition FDA Needs To Investigate Pfizer's Clinical Trial Fraud Allegations

Should the FDA investigate Pfizer's clinical trial fraud allegations? Or look the other way?

Article from Steve Kirsch on Substack

Vaccines

Stop the vaccines now. The current COVID vaccines kill more people than they can possibly save from COVID, even if they were 100% effective so should be taken off the market immediately. For example, the vaccine may kill 117 kids for every kid that is saved from COVID.
The liability exemption is now lifted retroactively. Patients who have been harmed by the COVID vaccines can now sue the drug company for damages up to $100M per case of fatality or disability.
Every post-vaccination ailment, affliction and death appearing within 4 weeks of vaccination that appears at a rate of 10X or more vs. baseline should be attributed to the vaccine unless and until proven otherwise, by irrefutable evidence, with costs of all diagnostic procedures to be born by the pharmaceutical manufacturer.
For future approved vaccines, informed consent provide shall include any and all symptoms that are elevated in VAERS by 10X or more over “baseline” reporting rates.
For future approved vaccines, require autopsies for anyone who dies within 2 weeks of getting the vaccine. The autopsy reports should be posted in a public database with Names and other PHI related data redacted
Failure to file a VAERS report for anyone who dies within 30 days of COVID vaccination shall be liable to a fine of $100,000 per incident.

Labcorp Antibodies Test Results Positive

SEE OTHER TEST RESULTS BELOW

Why Is Natural Immunity Still Being Ignored By The Corrupt Government & Corporate Media?

Blood test results from Labcorp show an unvaccinated family of four people still have antibodies 1 year later after infection. Family of people with ages ranging from 12-48 still are loaded with antibodies.

Can this family get a vaccine mandate exemption?

Our grossly corrupt FDA and Government Advises Against Use of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test Results. For one reason only? $MONEY$

Here is the language used by the criminals running the CDC. All eligible people should be vaccinated, including unvaccinated people who have previously been infected and have detectable antibodies.

Numerous immunologic studies (NO STUDIES LINKED?) have consistently shown that vaccination of individuals who were previously infected enhances their immune response, and growing epidemiologic evidence indicates that vaccination following infection further reduces the risk of subsequent infection, including in the setting of increased circulation of more infectious variants.

CDC Website Shows Possible Myocarditisp Side Effects From Those Previously Infected

Risk of an MIS-like illness or the known risks of COVID-19 vaccination such as the rare risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination for people who meet the following criteria:

Clinical recovery has been achieved, including return to normal cardiac function;
It has been ≥90 days since their diagnosis of MIS-C;
They are in an area of high or substantial community transmission of SARS-CoV-2, or otherwise have an increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 exposure and transmission; and
Onset of MIS-C occurred before any COVID-19 vaccination.

People diagnosed with MIS-C or MIS-A after COVID-19 vaccination

In the rare instance of a person developing MIS-C, MIS-A, or a similar clinical illness after receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine, referral to a specialist in infectious diseases, rheumatology, or cardiology should be considered. Because MIS-C and MIS-A are conditions known to occur with SARS-CoV-2 infection, these individuals should be assessed for laboratory evidence of current or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Healthcare and public health professionals should also consider requesting a consultation from the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment COVIDvax project. In addition, all illnesses consistent with MIS-C or MIS-A occurring in persons who received any COVID-19 vaccine should be reported to VAERS.

FDA today: 42% of children 5-11 have natural immunity

Fact Checking The Fact Checker Lies & Fake News

Full article comments.

One of the downsides of telling the truth in this environment is that it seems everyone and their brother wants to tear all your arguments to shreds.

I could spend full time just refuting all the hit pieces written about the content I’ve produced. Here’s my fact check of the fact-checkers as a repurposed graphic:

Rather than address every point of every fact check, here is a checklist for things that a thorough fact checker should be able to answer, but can’t or won’t.

Note that this is a quick list I put together in about 30 minutes. There are more, but you get the idea:

What is my motivation for suddenly, at age 65, becoming a spreader of misinformation and conspiracy theories? And why did it only happen right after hearing about my friends who had died or been disabled by the COVID vaccines? Do you even know me or have we ever met?
Dr. Toby Rogers computed 117 deaths per kid saved in ages 5 to 11? Do you agree with his analysis? 20,000 people read that article and couldn’t find a hole. So where did he go wrong and how can be sure you got it right and he got it wrong?
If this is all done out of Kirsch's ego, then how is it that 30 other scientists, statisticians, and doctors all agree with him? Why did all of these people suddenly become conspiracy theorists? What’s their motivation for the fraud and deception?
If the vaccines are safe, how come Alex Berenson also thinks the vaccines are unsafe? Is he also a crackpot? Isn’t it unfair just to attack Kirsch? Berenson and Kirsch hardly ever talk, yet came to the same conclusion. What about Del Bigtree? He found the same thing. In fact, Bigtree’s attorney calculated a VAERS URF of 50 well before Kirsch did. So why pick on Kirsch?
If the fact checker uses a pseudonym, why can’t you tell us what your name is? Are you going to tell us who funded you to do the hit piece?
Will you debate us in a recorded Zoom call where you can answer all our questions? We are eager to find out how we were fooled by all this data.
If the vax is so safe, why are there so many death entries in VAERS this year?
If you think there is simply “over-reporting” in VAERS this year, what is your actual evidence of that? All the people we talked to are reporting more events because there are more events happening. In fact, most people report that there are at least 100X more events this year than in previous years. So it seems like VAERS is actually under-reported this year, and not over-reported, don’t you think?
There are 5,288 symptoms that haven’t been reported for ANY vaccine in the last 5 years that are being reported for the first time in these vaccines. Why?
Why are there more adverse event reports this year than for every vaccine in the last 30 years combined?
If the URF isn't 41, what is the true URF and did you calculate it using the CDC-approved methodology like we did? (see The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome).
If we got it wrong, then tell us: How many people do you estimate have been killed by the COVID vaccines and how do you know?
One of the ways we computed the number of deaths from the vaccine was using an independent polling company. How was that gamed?
Why are athletes dropping by a 60X rate after the vax rollout?
How did Ernest Ramirez's son die?
How do you explain the causes of death of the 14 cases the CDC examined? 5 of them died from cardiac arrest!
How does he explain the results of Peter Schirmacher?
Why did Taiwan report more deaths from the vaccine than from COVID?
Why is the line slope going the wrong way in the Harvard study?
How do you explain that the biodistribution showing accumulation in the ovaries correlate with the high numbers of VAERS symptoms for menstrual problems many with huge elevations compared to baseline (previous vaccines).
Why are cardiologists reporting highly elevated # of cases of heart disease in kids after the vax rolled out?
Why is the cardio testing lab at UCSF now filled with kids 7 to 10 only AFTER the vaccines rolled out for that age range?
Why is a top California neurologist needing to report 2,000 VAERS events this year when in the last 11 years she's never need to report a single adverse event?
How do we explain the families where 3 relatives, all previously healthy, die within days after the COVID shot?
How do we explain Gavin Newsom being diagnosed with GBS within days after his booster? Isn’t it perfectly safe?
How did 2 cricket players recently vaccinated drop on the field within 10 minutes of each other? Bad luck?
Why does the CDC *REFUSE* to calculate and use the proper URF for VAERS when interpreting the safety data? Pfizer PROVED that VAERS is 5X underreported for myocarditis, and the CDC will not even acknowledge that? John Su is using a URF of 1. That is clearly false and misleading. Why are you not going after him? That is truly evil and corrupt. I’m not the bad guy here. This was in plain sight of the public (Pfizer slide with the Optum data (see my article about this).
How come undertakers report a huge increase in business right after the vaccines rolled out?
Why aren't the nursing homes disputing Abrien Aguirre's account that there were 10 times as many deaths from the vaccines than from COVID?
How come the CDC hasn't ascribed even a single death from the vaccines in light of Schirmacher's study? That’s inexplicable isn’t it?
Why are there so many vaccine-injured people that Facebook had to remove groups of 250,000 and more (multiple times).
Why aren't the vaccine injured getting any press?
Why did YouTube censor Dr. Peter Doshi's testimony? UCSF Professor Aditi Bhargava spoke as well and was censored. Why? Are you speaking out about that?
How come Jessica Rose’s myocarditis paper was pulled by the publisher? Are you making a stink about the corruption of science here? Or are you just trying to discredit me?
What about Maddie de Garay? Why didn't the FDA, CDC, or Pfizer ever investigate? Why did Janet Woodcock assure me they would and then did nothing? Why didn't they report the truth and stop the trial on the permanent paralysis. Her result aligns PERFECTLY with the mechanism of action of the drug? How can they have eliminated the vax as the cause without ever talking to her? They are supposed to assume it is the vax until they can show otherwise.
What about the 5X exclusions (vs placebo group) in the Pfizer trial? That can't be by chance can it?
How come there were so few all-cause deaths in the Pfizer study? It was supposed to be a representative group! There should be been around 110 deaths in each group, right?
How come Pfizer 6 months study shows more all cause deaths in the treatment group in than in the placebo group? Where is the PROOF that the vaccines are saving lives? Whoops!!!! No proof at all of a single life saved. As a fact checker, why aren’t you calling that out? Instead you are targetting me. Hmmmm.
Why were there 4X as many cardiac arrests in the vax group vs. placebo in the Pfizer Phase 3 study (6 month)? Seems pretty high. It wasn’t just bad luck since we see all these athletes in plain sight dropping. So isn’t it more likely than not this is real?
Aren’t you concerned that the trials going forward are too underpowered to resolve any of these questions?
Wasn’t there gaming in the Pfizer Phase 3 trials on adverse event reporting where people found it difficult/impossible to report AEs.
Despite the gaming of the AE reports, aren’t you alarmed at the statistically significant large increase in overall morbidity in all of the COVID vaccine trials (the paper US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good… by J. Bart Classen, MD).
How come the NIH and WHO did absolutely nothing when the fluvoxamine Phase 3 trial was published in Lancet? They didn't even note it in the guidelines. Did you protest that? Why not? It’s December 2, 2021 and the fluvoxamine recommendation was Last Updated: April 23, 2021. The Lancet article was widely covered by all major media, but the NIH did nothing. How do you explain that? Why aren’t you spending your valuable time focusing on that?
How come nobody can cite a SINGLE RCT that shows that masks work against COVID?
How come Professor Jeffrey Morris changed the topic whenever we tried to show him that the symptoms in VAERS were dose dependent? (Note: dose dependency is one of the most impressive indicators of causality, but we use all Bradford-Hill criteria to assess causality).
Dr. Steven A. Anderson of the FDA is supposed to be monitoring the VAERS data like a hawk. We have people highly qualified to who have spent months analyzing the VAERS data. Why does Dr. Anderson refuse to meet with us?
How come the FDA and CDC outside committee members all turned down a $1M research grant just to talk to us for a few hours and answer questions? What are they afraid of?
If the CDC and FDA members are independent, why did one of them admit in a private conversation that if they didn’t vote the way the FDA /CDC wanted they would be kicked off the committee like Martin Kulldorff.
If the vaccines are so safe, then why did CDC insiders tip off a friend of mine in January not to get the vaccines?
If the excess deaths in VAERS was not caused by the vaccine, then what is causing it and why isn’t the CDC investigating? These causes of death were not normal.
While it is amusing for people to refer to the Mclachlan VAERS study and argue that all the deaths were normal, that’s simply not what the study said. Shall we go through all 250 cases one by one? The paper said “Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.” So it is interesting that some people can definitively state that the vaccine didn’t cause their death. Are these fact checkers willing to go through the cases one by one with Scott and our team and show us all how we got it wrong?

When you find a “fact check” that addresses those 51 questions, that would be great because I have another 130 questions just like those which I’d love to hear them explain as well.

Debunking Steve Kirsch’s latest claims about covid vaccine deaths

Here is the Medium article. Whoever wrote this “fact check” clearly spent a lot of time putting together his case. Basically, this nameless, faceless person claims that Crawford cherry picked data and that the excess death data doesn’t line up with a deadly vaccine. I just learned about this on Dec 1 at 11pm.

The author says my motivation is ego and fame. Wow. This shows you the quality of his work. Is the author willing to challenge my team in a recorded debate? I seriously doubt it. But I’ve got an open invitation to do just that! Let’s find the truth. We are not afraid of a challenge. Is he? If you are “The Gift of Fire,” then please respond in the comments.

He asks in his title: “What motivates a tech millionaire to fight against covid vaccines?” I’d have a lot more respect for him if was able to get that simple question right. But he can’t even get that one right. Everyone who knows me and works with me will tell you the answer: “Mr. Kirsch just wants to save lives.” I would argue if he can’t get something simple like that out, that we should have a lot less confidence in anything else he says.

So rather than spend our time debunking his debunk, I want to issue a challenge to our anonymous “do gooder.” We’ll address all of your points in your article, if you address all the points above all in a LIVE RECORDED zoom call where we can set the record straight.

How about it?

Healthfeedback fact check

Today, for example, someone sent me this link from the “experts” at healthfeedback.org that fact checked two statements that they claim that I made:

"the ovaries get the highest concentration of [lipid nanoparticles from RNA vaccines]. This turns the ovaries into a very large manufacturing plant to turn out toxic spike protein"
"FDA experts reveal the Covid-19 Vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every 1 life they save"

The short story is the first statement was taken completely out of context and was referring to a chart that was limited to showing the body parts where we did not expect to see any lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivered. The second was a quote from The Expose that I never claimed. It was their mistake, not mine.

If we address the “context problem” of the first one and they mistake by The Expose in the second one, we are left with:

When we look at areas of the body where we didn’t expect to see the LNPs, the ovaries has the highest accumulation.
The VAERS data shows that the vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every life that they might save. It’s not just me that says that. The Walach and Kostoff papers, published in peer reviewed medical journals, say the same thing.

The facts supporting both of these statements are pretty straightforward.

15 things everyone needs to know about COVID and how to treat it

Steve Kirsch's Newsletter

Avoid all the COVID vaccines, even Novavax. Just say no. It’s not for anyone. No exceptions. The data show that these vaccines kill more people than they save. You can end up dead or disabled or with a compromised immune system for the rest of your life. For kids, for example, we will kill over 100 kids to save 1 life from COVID. These are the most dangerous vaccines ever deployed; 800x more deadly than the smallpox vaccine. Novavax has a much better safety profile than the current vaccines, but there may be serious, longer term risks here that we need to quantify. It’s not their fault… the spike protein is particularly toxic because it was designed to be toxic (I’m friends with Li-Meng Yan; we talk). The experts I work with say “not enough data.” So our advice is let’s wait for the data and use early treatment in the meantime. You can never unvaccinate yourself and right now early treatments are a great solution with higher efficacy and known safety.
If you get COVID, start early treatment ASAP as soon as you have symptoms. Early treatment is much safer and there is a much lower chance of long haul COVID, MIS-C, and adverse events. See my treatment advice for details; many options are available without a doctor or prescription. The immunity you acquire from getting the real virus is both robust and durable.
Make sure you have your early treatment drugs already in your house so you can start treatment as soon as you have symptoms.
If you aren’t sure you have COVID, you can get a PCR test, but these can be inaccurate. If you have symptoms, you can use a home test kit such as the binax now kit (Note: they will not work unless you currently are symptomatic, so don’t use these kits for employer screening; it’s a complete waste of money).
The mainstream media wants to keep you in the dark about the truth about these vaccines so they only tell you one side of the story and they censor competent speakers on the other side. This is why you will never see Peter McCullough on CNN, in the NY Times, etc. They will never sponsor a debate between the top experts on both sides because that would destroy the false narrative and damage the reputation of the mainstream media. So they have to tell only one side of the narrative.
The whole pandemic response was unnecessary. The lockdowns, social distancing, masking, business restrictions, etc. We knew back in March 2020 that a cocktail of repurposed drugs given early could keep people out of the hospital and turn COVID into a mild cold with no long-term side effects.
The NIH is deliberately suppressing early treatments that work like fluvoxamine, ivermectin, vitamin D, inhaled budesonide, etc. Even after fluvoxamine was proven in a large Phase 3 clinical trial with an incredible 12X reduction in hospitalization, the NIH did nothing. Absolutely nothing. They do not want you to know about fluvoxamine. When Fareed and Tyson tried to get the NIH and FDA’s attention in March 2020 on their protocol which has a 99.76% risk reduction (better than anything else), they were ignored.
Masks don’t work. It is political theater to prove they can use fear to get you to do nonsensical things. Nobody will debate my team on this because it would destroy their argument.
Never trust the CDC, FDA, NIH, and medical community again. This is the most dangerous vaccine in human history and the CDC couldn’t find a single safety signal (it was the DoD that spotted myocarditis). The NIH is sand-bagging early treatment. The mainstream medical community is basically believing everything the FDA and CDC are telling them without bothering to double-check anything.
Avoid the hospital. If you do get hospitalized, refuse intubation and remdesivir. Get a court order to get cyproheptadine, fluvoxamine, and/or ivermectin. You will need a court order because all hospitals will refuse these proven treatments. See the list of hospitalized treatment protocols.
They could end vaccine hesitancy worldwide anytime they wanted. All they have to do is agree to a single 3 hour debate. But none of the so-called experts who claim the vaccines are safe will debate our team. This is because they know they will lose. So they must ignore and censor us. Their unwillingness to have a fair scientific discussion with experts on both sides tells you everything you need to know about who has the better argument.
If you maintain very high levels of Vitamin D, you can greatly reduce your chance of getting sick from COVID. It’s the simplest thing to do and it is safe and effective. There’s a strong correlation between your vitamin D level and your risk of dying from COVID-19. At a level of 17 ng/mL, the death rate is nearly 100%. At a level of 35 ng/mL, the death rate is near zero. It is inexplicable that the medical community and/or NIH isn’t telling people this.
Fluvoxamine is highly effective if you get COVID. The best dose is 50mg twice a day for 14 days. Take it as soon as you have symptoms. The side effect profile is near zero as long as you avoid coffee. If you can’t get fluvoxamine, you can use 30mg once a day of fluvoxetine. Both drugs work for hospitalized patients as well. Many other drugs are very effective. See my treatment advice for details.
The single best drug if you get COVID is Interferon Lambda, but it is not FDA approved; it is available only in clinical trials. It works because it replaces the interferon that the virus disables when it attacks you. D-dimer is greatly reduced in the treatment group… this is very telling.
The reason all this happened is that people don't double-check authorities. They believe the authorities, and it creates a domino effect. They aren't inherently evil, just trusting the wrong people. They think I'm an evil person because I disagree with the authorities. I disagree because the data doesn’t support what we are being told. Few people (especially doctors) have the time/expertise to understand/analyze VAERS. We haven't found *anyone* in the world who is able to "correct" our calculation. But as long as people think we are misinformation spreaders, nobody listens to us. Most people will make decisions based on the # of “experts” supporting a viewpoint, not by looking at the data directly; few people have the time and expertise to do that. I did that in early May, 2021 and here is the first article I wrote at the time (Should you get vaccinated?) after I was convinced the vaccines were causing harm. I lost a lot of friends after writing that article, but it was the right thing to do and I don’t regret it. I think I’ve made more than 100X new friends by standing up for science and truth. I also found a very odd asymmetry… everyone on our side will happily engage the other side in a discussion on the merit, but not vice versa. They just want to tell us we are wrong, but will not explain to us why we are wrong (since they don’t know).

Dr. Steve Kirsch Bombshell Testimony at FDA Vaccine Hearing

Why are we killing people to save lives with vaccines?

Why Is Medical Corruption Being Ignored? 12 Examples

Steve Kirsh's newsletter - I thought I'd start a list to capture what is going on. Nobody in the mainstream medical community seems to mind these abuses. They are remaining silent, so I guess these are all OK nowadays.

Jessica Rose’s paper exposing how dangerous vaccine-induced myocarditis was “temporarily removed” by the publisher of the journal over the objections of the Editor and everyone else. The reason is given: “it wasn’t an invited paper.” That is incorrect since the Editor was the one that handled the paper. It is still removed as of this writing. I don’t think it will ever be re-instated.
Fluvoxamine was shown in a large Phase 3 clinical trial to reduce death from COVID by 12X. This is the most effective drug ever discovered for COVID. Nothing else has a better effect size. All the earlier trials were 100% successful. It even works in hospitalized patients. The FDA, CDC, NIH, and WHO all ignored it. Stunning, but totally expected. It only works if it is from a major US drug company. Repurposed drugs don’t count.
Article in the BMJ shows the corruption of the Pfizer clinical trials depended on by the FDA to justify drug approval. Ignored by the ACIP committee doing the approval on the same day the story hit. They didn’t even mention it. The article noted that even after Pfizer knew about the corruption, they awarded the company four more contracts.
Researchers have to sue the FDA to see the Pfizer data (story and lawsuit). Nobody is revealing the data like they are supposed to do. I wonder why?
Maddie de Garay is paralyzed for life in the Pfizer 12-15 clinical trial. It is reported in the trial results as mild abdominal pain. FDA agrees to investigate but does nothing. No warning is ever given to parents that the vaccine can permanently cripple their child. Nobody seems to mind that the FDA and CDC never investigated it. Mainstream media ignores the story.
One of the world’s top epidemiologists wrote a paper that points out cracks in the false narrative. It easily passes peer review and the publisher tells him it will be published. It is never published.
Fluvoxamine was recommended to be used by doctors on a shared decision-making basis against COVID by a panel of key opinion leaders by more than a 2:1 margin. Written up in Washington Post op-ed. Seven medical journals refuse to publish the meeting notes (after taking months to give an answer). It’s still unpublished. So nobody will know.
The CDC still claims they haven’t found a causal link between death and the COVID vaccines even though autopsy results show definitively that the vaccines are killing people (see this article and this confirmation by other German pathologists).
The CDC still claims that the spike protein is harmless despite numerous peer reviewed papers showing the opposite.
The CDC and NIH ignore ivermectin despite multiple peer-reviewed systematic reviews and meta analyses showing it works. Not only that, they go out of their way to make it hard to get and the AMA recommends people not use it. But this is the highest level of evidence medicine! They aren’t walking the talk for this drug.
Paul Offit and others on the FDA and CDC panel say there are more cases of myocarditis from COVID than from the vaccines. After he’s conclusively shown to be wrong, he doesn’t acknowledge it.
And my personal favorite is that everyone ignores my analysis of the VAERS data showing 150,000 deaths from the vaccine. They told me “it isn’t peer reviewed.” But it is. Lots of my peers have reviewed it and found it very solid. But there are other papers that are peer reviewed and published that show the same result (which I cite at the start). So if I’m wrong about the 150,000 deaths (which I showed 8 different ways), then why won’t anyone show me their “correct” analysis of the data we have? Whenever I ask that question, I get silence. Every time. Nobody in the medical community likes reading stuff that goes against their belief system it seems.

What’s sad is that all of the above corruptions are unambiguous, but leading medical “authorities” are silent on all of them.

I’m sure I missed a lot of things. Please comment below about your favorite example of the corruption of science.

UK Pfizer Trial Researcher Whisteblower on Data Integrity

Pfizer faked trial data according to British Medical Journal

MEDICAL JOURNAL: Pfizer vaccine trial RESEARCHER blows whistle on DATA INTEGRITY & FALSIFICATION?

Israeli Physicians, Scientists Advise FDA of ‘Severe Concerns’ Regarding Reliability and Legality of Official Israeli COVID Vaccine Data

An independent Israeli group of physicians, lawyers, scientists, and researchers called the Professional Ethics Front today advised the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the upcoming FDA discussion on administering COVID-19 vaccines to children aged 5-11, expressing “severe concerns” regarding the reliability and legality of official Israeli COVID vaccine data.

“We are aware that the state of Israel is perceived as ‘the world laboratory’ regarding the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, as reflected by statements made by Dr. Albert Bourla, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and other senior figures in leading health authorities throughout the world,” the letter reads. “It is therefore our understanding that the data and information coming from Israel play a crucial role in critical decision-making processes in regards to COVID-19 vaccination policies. We thus see it of utmost importance to convey a message of warning and raise our major concerns regarding potential flaws in the reliability of the Israeli data with respect to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, as well as many significant legal and ethical violations that accompany the data collection processes.”

The letter elaborates: “We believe that the significant failures underlying the Israeli database, which have been brought to our attention by numerous testimonies, impair its reliability and legality to such an extent that it should not be used for making any critical decisions regarding the COVID-19 vaccines.”

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to Haifa and Reichman Universities Health and Risk Communication lecturer Dr. Yaffa Shir Raz, one of the letter’s authors, about their findings and conclusions:

This document briefly outlines the main failures that lead to this unfortunate, albeit inevitable, conclusion,” the notice reads. “We emphasize that we can expand and clarify further, as well as provide references, in relation to each of the failures described below:

“1. Lack of a Public and Transparent Adverse Events Reporting System: The first prerequisite for granting a permit for use of any new medicinal preparation is the setup of adverse events (AEs) collection systems that would allow appropriate management of risks and generation of alarm signals. All the more so when it concerns a mass vaccination campaign of a first-in-human use of an experimental preparation to the citizens of an entire country, which serves as a global model. Despite the advanced technological systems available to the Israeli HMOs, and contrary to common standards in Western countries, there exists no proper and transparent AEs reporting system in Israel, such as the US VAERS system, that is accessible to the public, and thus no appropriate tracking of AEs occurring after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine.

“Healthcare professionals or citizens in Israel, who wish to submit reports of AEs following vaccination, are unable to do so. As such, there is no possibility for either of these populations to also search through the data, rendering impossible the examination of the reported AEs by other citizens, physicians and independent researchers. Instead, there is only an online AEs reporting form available on the MOH’s website. This form, however, was for many months not useful, since it did not allow the inclusion of personal contact information. The free text field intended to describe the AEs comprised a limited number of characters and the symptoms list available to choose from was limited as well and included only mild AEs terms.

“A petition to the Israeli Supreme Court of Justice has led the Ministry of Health (MOH) to implement the above-mentioned necessary improvements to the form. Unfortunately, the modification of the form was made very late, after the majority of the adult population had already been vaccinated. Furthermore, since the report is not publicized in a transparent manner, the MOH is the only recipient and thus the sole owner of the data and the decision-making authority on the utilization and distribution of it.

“Moreover, no tracking and monitoring of even the most sensitive populations, such as pregnant women and the elderly, is taking place. For example, as part of the ‘National Senior Population Protection from the COVID-19 Program’ in Israel, a reporting system was activated in April 2020, which presented detailed reports almost daily on COVID-19 eruptions, on hospitalizations and on mortality in nursing homes. However, on December 29th, 2020, the very day the vaccination campaign commenced in nursing homes, the publication of these reports was abruptly discontinued, and has never been resumed since.

“2. Severe Impairments in Healthcare Professionals’ Adverse Events Reporting System: We reveal that physicians and medical teams in Israel encounter great obstacles when attempting to report AEs following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination to the MOH. We have testimonies of physicians, who attest to the complexity of filling the AEs reports to the MOH, claiming that reporting is almost impractical in the incredibly stressful working conditions of medical teams in Israel during this period. As a result of these tremendous difficulties, there is an immense underreporting of AEs by healthcare professionals in Israel, and AEs are only rarely reported in exceptional cases. The physicians’ testimonies that we have obtained also show that reported AEs are not openly publicized, or made available to the healthcare professionals themselves.

“Even more disturbing is the fact that the few reports, which the Israeli MOH does publicize about the AEs observed after receiving the Pfizer-BIONtech COVID-19 vaccine, are not consistent with the testimonies of physicians regarding severe adverse events (SAEs) that they themselves have reported to the MOH. Thus, for example, in a discussion before the Advisory Committee of the FDA on September 17th, 2021, the head of the Israeli Health Services, Dr. Alroy-Preis, claimed that only one case of myocarditis was observed after the 3rd vaccine dose out of three million people who received the 3rd vaccine dose in Israel. This claim does not reconcile with research findings from all over the world, including findings from Israel, that were published in the medical literature, according to which the rate of myocarditis observed after receiving the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine stands at 1:3,000-6,000. The claim of Dr. Alroy-Preis also stands in contrast to reports given by a handful of brave Israeli doctors about cases of myocarditis and other SAEs observed in close proximity to the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine.

“One of these physicians, Dr. Yoav Yehezkelli, who was among the founders of the Israeli Outbreak Management Team, wrote on his Facebook page that he personally treated in his clinic a 17-year-old boy, who suffered from myocarditis several days after the 3rd vaccine dose, and he knows of two additional cases among the boy’s classmates. Dr. Yoav Yehezkelli added that he reported the myocarditis case that he treated (and additional SAEs cases) to the MOH through the online reporting system, as well as via personal reports to MOH officials, but his reports were quickly dismissed as having no link to the vaccine, without thorough examination of the cases. Dr. Yehezkelli also mentioned that he encountered other patients in his clinic, who were hospitalized after suffering from AEs in close proximity to receiving Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines, and the hospital supposedly failed to report said AEs to the MOH. We have affidavits from nine other physicians, who have also treated cases of myocarditis or know of such cases, but have abandoned their attempts at reporting to the MOH having tackled immense difficulty or, alternatively, reported to the MOH and did not get any response. It is statistically improbable that a small cohort of physicians should witness these many COVID-19 vaccine injuries if Dr. Alroy-Preis’s claim was accurate.

“3. Data Distortion: Recently, two serious incidents in which data presented by the MOH was distorted have been revealed.

“The first one was the deletion of thousands of citizens’ responses to a post by the MOH. In response to an MOH post that read ‘Let’s talk about the adverse events’, and claimed that the vaccine is completely safe and that SAEs are extremely rare, tens of thousands of responses from the public were posted, with many reporting AEs, including SAEs, which they suffered after the vaccine. But instead of examining the responses and addressing them, about half of them were deleted.

“The second event occurred about two weeks ago. Based on MOH dashboard data, an analysis conducted by members of the Israeli Public Emergency Council for the Corona Crisis (PECC) demonstrated that the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 3rd vaccine dose effectiveness is much lower than that claimed in the New England journal of Medicine study presented by Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis to the FDA panel on September 17th, 2021. Within 24 hours of the release of the PECC analysis, the relevant dashboard data history was completely re-written. The PECC released screenshots of both the original and “rectified” data.

“4. Legal and Ethical Violations in Data Collection Processes: Not only is the data coming from Israel regarding the safety and efficacy of the PfizerBioNtech COVID-19 vaccine apparently unreliable, but also the collection method is controversial, and claimed to be neither legal nor ethical. The Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccines are administered to the Israeli population without their informed consent, which is required by the GCP chapter of IHC-6 and carried out in other countries. This is a clear violation of the Nuremberg Code Rules, the Patient’s Bill of Rights, and the Israeli MOH directives for clinical trials on humans. Moreover, the Israeli citizens are under tremendous pressure to get vaccinated, almost to the point of coercion.

“Should the ‘Outbreak Management Team’ decide on a 3rd dose of the vaccine to the immunocompromised patients, it is not clear how many we can vaccinate, and it requires approval of the Helsinki committee (medical trial approval committee) and Pfizer’s approval. We are committed to Pfizer, to vaccinate only by the vaccination regimen established by them”. This is a statement made by Prof. Hezi Levi, former CEO of the Israeli MOH on July 5th, 2021. The evident conclusion is that the 3rd vaccine dose operation is an experiment requiring approval of the Helsinki Committee in charge of approving human medical experiments in Israel. Such an approval has never been issued. Moreover, the 3rd vaccine dose operation refers only to the immunocompromised population, and thus is even more unethical in healthy individuals, especially in young healthy individuals, shown to be at a higher risk for myocarditis.

“We are deeply concerned with the failure of the Vaccine Safety Committee (VSC) to fulfill its designated role. The VSC is responsible in Israel for vaccine safety and the official arm designated to monitor and collect safety data. It has not issued a single position paper on its behalf or raised a single red flag to raise wareness/bring attention to SAE cases and has never gathered in full assembly. Additionally, one of the public representative, who is a pediatrician (allergist, immunologist), never knew that he was appointed and did not attend any of the meetings, even when they did take place.”

The Israeli Professional Ethics Front concludes its notice to the FDA: “In accordance with the accepted perception established after World War II, the findings of experiments obtained in illegal and immoral ways should not be relied upon. We believe that the same rules should apply to the findings of the current experiment in Israel, since these findings were obtained through significant legal and ethical infringements. Our conclusion is further reinforced by the significant doubts about the reliability of the data reported by Israel, as detailed above, and the consequent major concern that their use might be misleading and thus disrupt the decision-making processes pertaining to the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccines.

“In the Book of Leviticus, it is said ‘Do not stand idly by while your neighbor’s blood is shed.’ In the spirit of those words, we implore the committee to take into consideration our urgent warnings and adopt utmost precaution when referring to the Israeli data concerning the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccines.”

Healthy mom suffers cascade of health problems after COVID shot, vows to fight medical corruption

5,000+ People in The United States Have Had A Similar ADE Issue According To The NIH.

She is holding a rally and vigil on the steps of the Supreme Court on November 2nd for similar victims.

A young mother, Brianne Driessen, was eager to sign up for the Astrazeneca COVID shot trial. Almost immediately after getting the injenction, she began experiencing severe adverse reactions, which continue to this day. In this interview with LifeSite’s Jim Hale, Driessen makes a passionate appeal for true informed consent and help for the thousands of fellow victims of the COVID jab.

A young mother from Utah shared with LifeSiteNews her nightmarish experience of developing severe adverse reactions immediately after receiving the COVID jab as part of the AstraZeneca COVID shot trial.

Brianne Dressen from Utah was a healthy mother of two young children and a pre-school teacher who eagerly signed up to the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine trial back in November 2020, as she was “confident that this was going to be our way out of the pandemic.” She received a first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine on November 4 and started experiencing adverse effects within an hour of getting the shot.

Dressen first experienced tingling in her arm, blurred vision, hyper-sensitivity to sound, light and touch, dizziness, nausea, and leg numbness. Weeks later, she was admitted to the hospital after her legs “stopped working” and she became incontinent. She had to undergo intense physical therapy, including re-learning how to walk.

Dressen was later diagnosed with a number of serious health conditions which affect her nervous system. She shared her ordeal with LifeSiteNews correspondent Jim Hale.

After a first of “many visits to the emergency room” ruled out multiple sclerosis and other major neuro-degenerative disorders, Dressen was sent home where she had to stay in a room by herself because of her extreme sensitivity to sound.

“My sensitivity to sound was so severe that even my little girl’s voice was too much for my ears,” she recalled.

She also suffered from hypersensitivity to light and had to “put towels on the windows to make the room completely black.”

Dressen lost 20 pounds, as she suffered from nausea and vomiting, and experienced difficulties swallowing her food.

She said she was certain that the vaccine was responsible for her condition.

“There is no question in my mind that the vaccine caused this reaction,” she said, before expressing anger and frustration at the fact that AstraZeneca did not investigate her case thoroughly, as would be expected during a clinical trial.

“You would hope that there would be someone who would be appropriately tracking the data, that these cases (even if they’re rare) are evaluated, that they are discussed, that the information is disclosed in a full and transparent manner. Unfortunately, that has not been the case,” she said.

“I really wish I could say that the drug companies did their due diligence with this, but they didn’t,” she added.

Dressen also revealed that her case was not included in the list of severe adverse events that was published by AstraZeneca. “And now there’s their published clinical trial data. I’m not in it,” she said.

AstraZeneca claims to follow up with all serious adverse events cases for up to 720 days but monitored Dressen over a much shorter period of time.

“I definitely was a serious adverse event,” said Dressen, “I was followed up with for 60 days.”

The pharmaceutical giant also agreed in their contract with clinical trial volunteers to pay for any injury or medical need that would result from the vaccine. An agreement that they did not honor in Dressen’s case.

“After months of repeated pleading and fighting with them to help us with the massive pile of medical bills, I have 590 dollars from them.”

For a long time, doctors could not figure out what was wrong with the young mother. They first diagnosed Dressen with “anxiety” from the COVID vaccine. But she was then able to go to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) where she received appropriate diagnoses, which included a number of nervous disorders such as: non-length-dependent neuropathy, short-term memory loss, sensory neuropathy, dysautonomia and severe postural tachycardia syndrome.

The young woman still suffers from these adverse effects to this day, almost a year after having been vaccinated, and her life has not been the same since.

“My body went from functioning at a normal, healthy level; I was able to take care of my kids and my work, too,” she said. “Now, my big accomplishment today will be talking to you and the fact that I made myself breakfast.”

LifeSiteNews correspondent Jim Hale then asked Dressen to discuss how this event changed her views on the pharmaceutical industry.

“This has been very eye opening for me,” replied Dressen, “I feel like I’ve been plucked out of the matrix.”

Dressen explained that she grew increasingly distrustful of government agencies as she witnessed evidence of them purposefully withholding information from the public.

“These [adverse] reactions are not being disclosed to the public,” she said. “Because of this, the public is not being provided informed consent, but also the medical community is not being informed appropriately that these reactions can happen.”

Dressen also claimed that attempts at withholding information on adverse events from the public does not only come from social media platforms but also from within the medical world.

“There’s medical censorship happening,” she said, “there’s censorship with the research; we have researchers that have tried to get case studies published in scientific journals and they can’t get them published.”

The young mother became emotional when she recalled that some of the people suffering from these adverse effects have committed suicide.

“I had to write a eulogy for a dear friend of mine, for her husband to read after she took her life,” she said.

Dressen and Hale then discussed other cases of people that have suffered loss as a result of the vaccine’s adverse effects, including that of Ernest Ramirez, a father from Texas who recently lost his 15-year-old son to the Pfizer vaccine. Hale also mentioned that in a recent interview with LifeSiteNews, Dr. Robert Malone, a pioneer of the mRNA technology used in the development of the COVID vaccines “told us, flat out, if you have an adolescent son, he should not be getting the vaccine.”

Among some of the initiatives taken in response to this issue, Dressen mentioned a website with over 500 testimonies and accounts of people who have suffered from COVID vaccine adverse events.

Additionally, she announced that a press conference is going to take place on November 2 on the steps of the Supreme Court to hold government agencies accountable.

“We’re uniting with those like Ernest Ramirez and we’re going to the capital to plead with our elected officials to help us and to hold these agencies, the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, accountable, because we know acutely just how much they know,” she said.

“They know about the suicides [and] the suicide attempts, they know about people losing their jobs because of inappropriate mandates, they know about the sick kids, they know about people being buried under medical debt and losing their homes, they know about the issues with the clinical trials,” she added.

In conclusion of the interview, Dressen insisted that she was not anti-vaccine and explained that her husband had gotten the COVID vaccine, but she advocated for informed consent and not coercing people.

“I really believe that everybody should have appropriate full informed consent so they can make an appropriate choice for themselves; and also, because there is a risk, there absolutely needs to be a choice,” she said.

She condemned government agencies for letting people who suffer from these adverse events deal with them on their own and for abandoning them.

“The problem is, if you get a vaccine reaction like this, you are completely on your own. The government agencies are not going to help you,” she said. “You will not be able to get financially compensated and your medical teams will have no idea what to do with you.”