Swine Flu & COVID: The Vaccine Mistakes Repeated

Why This Isn’t Academic for Me

I don’t write about vaccine policy, medical ethics, or institutional failure from a place of abstraction. I write about it because these systems have touched—and ended—the lives of people in my family.

In 1976, my grandfather took the swine flu vaccine during the nationwide rollout. Two weeks later, he died. Like many families at the time, we were told it was coincidence, unfortunate timing, and ultimately unknowable. The vaccination program itself was later halted, but there was no meaningful reckoning for those already affected. The questions our family had were never answered—only deferred.

Nearly fifty years later, history felt impossible to ignore.

My father was living in a nursing home when he received multiple COVID vaccinations along with a flu shot. Within months, his health deteriorated rapidly. He developed serious nervous system and mobility issues, declined quickly, and died within six months.

As with my grandfather, there was no clear investigation, no transparent discussion of risk, and no institutional willingness to even entertain the possibility that medical intervention might have played a role. What we encountered instead was silence, procedural deflection, and a familiar insistence that correlation must not be discussed—let alone examined.

I am not claiming certainty. I am not claiming intent. I am not claiming that every adverse outcome is caused by vaccination.

What I am claiming is this:
When medical systems discourage questioning, shield themselves from liability, and treat uncertainty as a threat rather than a reality, families like mine are left without answers—twice, across two generations.

That is why the comparison between the 1976 swine flu vaccination program and the COVID response is not theoretical to me. It is lived history. It is personal loss repeated under different circumstances, by the same kinds of institutional failures.

Coronafraud.com exists because institutions rarely document their own mistakes honestly—especially when doing so carries legal, financial, or reputational risk. When that happens, memory fades, records are sanitized, and families are left to piece together what happened on their own.

This work is not driven by anger.

It is driven by responsibility—to remember, to question, and to insist that “public health” never again mean unaccountable power over private lives.

Introduction: Two Crises, One Institutional Pattern

Public health rarely gets a clean second chance. When it does, the expectation is that past failures inform future decisions. Yet the COVID vaccine rollout revealed something troubling: the lessons of the 1976 swine flu vaccination program were not just forgotten—they were structurally ignored.

In 1976, the U.S. rushed a nationwide vaccination campaign in response to a feared pandemic that never materialized. Adverse events emerged, public trust collapsed, and the program was halted. It was later studied as a textbook example of how panic, politics, and liability distortion can override scientific caution.

Nearly fifty years later, during COVID, the same institutional dynamics reappeared—this time globally, digitally amplified, and backed by unprecedented financial and political power.

This article examines how swine flu and COVID are connected not by biology, but by governance failure.

1. Pandemic Prediction vs. Pandemic Reality

The 1976 swine flu episode began at Fort Dix, where a novel influenza strain infected soldiers. One death triggered fears of a replay of the 1918 Spanish Flu.

Public health leaders chose preemption over observation.

COVID followed a similar arc:

• Early models projected catastrophic outcomes

• Worst-case scenarios dominated decision-making

• Policy hardened before long-term data existed

In both cases, projection replaced proportion, and uncertainty was treated as unacceptable rather than inevitable.

2. Political Urgency as a Substitute for Scientific Restraint

In 1976, the vaccination program carried the direct backing of Gerald Ford. The political risk of being wrong was perceived as lower than the political risk of appearing inactive.

During COVID, the same calculus played out globally:

• Speed became proof of leadership

• Questioning timelines was framed as sabotage

• Policy reversals were delayed to preserve authority

Public health shifted from risk management to reputational defense.

3. Liability Shields: The Incentive That Never Changed

One of the clearest parallels between swine flu and COVID is who carried the risk.

1976 Swine Flu

Manufacturers refused participation without immunity. The federal government absorbed liability. When injuries surfaced, taxpayers paid.

COVID

Pharmaceutical companies again received broad liability protection. Compensation systems were narrow, slow, and opaque.

This design flaw matters because immunity from consequences alters behavior. When downside risk is removed, speed and scale are rewarded over caution and transparency.

4. Adverse Events: Dismissal First, Acknowledgment Later

The 1976 program unraveled after increased cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome appeared among recipients. Initial responses downplayed the signal. Only sustained evidence forced action.

COVID followed a similar trajectory:

• Early myocarditis and clotting signals were minimized

• Surveillance systems were criticized yet relied upon

• Public acknowledgment lagged independent analysis

The problem was not that adverse events existed.
It was that institutions resisted seeing them.

5. Messaging Failure: Certainty Over Credibility

After swine flu, public confidence in health authorities suffered for decades. One reason was messaging that allowed no room for error.

COVID repeated that mistake:

• “Safe and effective” became an absolute claim

• Uncertainty was treated as a threat

• Policy changes eroded earlier assurances

History shows that overconfidence destroys trust faster than bad outcomes.

6. One-Size-Fits-All Policy, Twice

In 1976, vaccination was broadly recommended despite uneven risk.

During COVID, mandates extended to:

• Young adults

• Children

• Previously infected individuals

Risk stratification came late, if at all. Public health favored compliance simplicity over biological nuance—a tradeoff that proved costly.

7. Dissent Was Managed, Not Integrated

Post-1976 reviews revealed internal disagreement that never meaningfully slowed the program.

During COVID, dissent moved into the open—and was actively suppressed. Doctors and researchers questioning mandates, timelines, or transparency were censored, deplatformed, or professionally sanctioned.

Healthy systems absorb criticism. Fragile ones silence it.

8. The Defining Difference: Knowing When to Stop

Here is where the two crises diverge sharply:

• 1976: The vaccination program was halted once harm became undeniable.

• COVID: Programs expanded—boosters, mandates, passports—even as risk profiles shifted.

That single difference explains why COVID remains unresolved socially, politically, and psychologically.

Stopping requires humility.
Expansion requires certainty.

9. Why the Lesson Was Lost

The swine flu failure should have reshaped public health permanently. It didn’t, because:

• Institutional memory faded

• Financial incentives grew

• Media rewarded certainty

• Bureaucracies optimized for scale

What was once a warning became a footnote.

10. Swine Flu Was the Dress Rehearsal. COVID Was the Main Event.

The 1976 swine flu vaccine program was not a conspiracy. Neither was COVID.

Both were system failures—driven by fear, insulated by liability shields, and protected by institutional defensiveness.

The tragedy is not that mistakes were made.
It’s that they were made again, despite a clear historical precedent.

If public health wants trust restored, it must do what it avoided in both eras:

• Admit uncertainty

• Accept accountability

• Protect dissent

• Learn publicly

Otherwise, the next crisis will look familiar—because the system that created it never changed.

60 Minutes - 1967 Swine Flu Neurological Disorders Comparison

Good, honest, old-fashioned reporting. Those days are largely gone now.

This is an old segment from CBS '60 Minutes' on the swine flu (also known as H1N1) & the vaccine that was developed to stop the pandemic. 

The CDC pushed the swine flu vaccine in 1976 after several cases were reported but none were confirmed.  Watch below . . . 

Dr. Michael Hattwick  raised the flag about the potential links but it was ignored. Michael Hattwick, who ran the CDC's flu tracking center at the time, says while much of it was done looks unnecessary, in hindsight, at the time, it seemed courageous.  Dr. MICHAEL HATTWICK: There was always the fear of doing too little. I think this time, there'll be more fear about doing too much and that may be a lesson we learned from '76.

Immunization Physician: No Benefit From "Vaccination" At All

Mt. Vernon school board changing COVID-19 protocols based on the testimony of Dr. Dan Stock

Why are we having an outbreak of colds, flu and COVID in the middle of the summer when vitamin D is at its highest? How can people contract the virus when they have no contact with anyone?' 

Mt. Vernon schools officials tabled a proposed update to its health and safety protocols and will contemplate other parts of the existing plan after receiving feedback from parents and a physician.

The debate comes as the school district records three COVID-19 cases and 72 close contacts exposed to those individuals since the start of the school year just over a week ago.

Dr. Dan Stock, a McCordsville resident and family medicine physician, said the measures Mt. Vernon has implemented and is considering adding are not useful. He added Indiana Department of Health and CDC recommendations are “contrary to the rules of science.”

Coronavirus and other respiratory virus particles are small enough to go through masks, Stock continued, adding vaccines will not be effective against COVID-19. He noted the virus is on the rise in the middle of summer, a time when respiratory viral syndromes are typically at their lowest. Stock also pointed to the COVID-19 outbreak last month in Provincetown, Massachusetts, the majority of which included vaccinated individuals.

Vaccines don’t prevent infection, just symptoms, Stock said.

“So you cannot stop spread, you cannot make these numbers that you’ve planned on get better by doing any of the things that you’re doing,” he said. “Because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens. And you can’t prevent it with a vaccine because they don’t do the very thing you’re wanting them to do. And you will be chasing this through the remainder of your life until you recognize the Centers for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance.”

Meeting attendees also questioned whether the school corporation is legally required to have close contacts quarantine at home. Parker said the corporation’s legal counsel advised that reporting positive cases, conducting contact tracing investigations and requiring un-vaccinated close contacts to quarantine is legally required, and that it’s a Class B misdemeanor for each day of noncompliance.

Parker also noted the school corporation has received 20 emails on the health and safety plan, seven of which ask for more restrictive protocols.

Mt. Vernon recorded just over 300 COVID-19 cases among students and staff throughout the 2020-2021 school year, with 1,775 close contacts. The district’s highest monthly totals per school ranged from five cases to 29.

Under the proposed additions to the health and safety plan, nine students/staff members not sharing a household who are COVID-positive in an elementary school, and 15 in a secondary school, would put the building in the orange tier, requiring masks to be worn inside. Parker said based on last year’s data, such a situation wouldn’t be likely unless under extreme circumstances.

“To trigger mask wearing in the orange tier, we believe that unless our numbers of COVID-positive cases increase considerably from last year, or they are all concentrated in a few short weeks, we’re not likely to get to the orange tier due to that reason,” he said.

In light of the comments and literature Stock provided, board members expressed a desire to hold off on considering adding COVID-positive totals as triggers to the tiered color system, and explore whether quarantining could be mitigated or avoided.

Board member Shannon Walls moved to table the matter for further discussion at the school board’s next meeting, which is scheduled for 7 p.m. Monday, Aug. 16 in the school corporation’s administration building located at 1806 W. State Road 234, Fortville.

“I believe we have an obligation to, one, find the facts that were shared today,” Walls said. “We have not had a chance to review that information ourselves as a board. I think we have an obligation to our students to know what our academic plan is moving forward.”

The board approved the motion 4-0 with Walls, Chad Gray, Kellie Freeman and Tony May voting in favor. Phil Edwards was not present.

The decision only tabled the proposed addition of COVID-positive totals per school building to the health and safety plan. The rest of the plan remains in place, including quarantining measures.

Here is a link to full story

Swine Flu Vaccines in 1976 Were Linked To Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Swine Flu Vaccines in 1976 Were Linked To Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome is thought to be caused by a problem with the immune system, the body's natural defense against illness and infection. New neurologic symptoms is one of the reasons they stopped the J&J vaccines. 

Normally the immune system attacks any germs that get into the body. But in people with Guillain-Barré syndrome, something goes wrong and it mistakenly attacks the nerves.

This damages the nerves and stops signals from the brain traveling along with them properly, which can cause problems such as numbness, weakness and pain in the limbs.

It's not clear exactly why this happens. The condition is not passed from person to person and is not inherited.

In the past, the flu vaccine used in the US during a swine flu outbreak in 1976 were linked to an increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome.

But research has since found the chances of developing the condition after having a vaccination are extremely small.

For example, a study into the vaccine used during the 2009 swine flu outbreak found that for every million people who had the vaccination, there were fewer than 2 extra cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome.

And evidence suggests that you are far more likely to get Guillain-Barré syndrome from an infection, such as the flu, than the vaccine designed to prevent the infection, such as the flu jab.

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare disorder where the body’s immune system damages nerve cells, causing muscle weakness and sometimes paralysis. While its cause is not fully understood, the syndrome often follows infection with a virus or bacteria. Each year in the United States, an estimated 3,000 to 6,000 people develop GBS. Most people fully recover from GBS, but some have permanent nerve damage.

In 1976, there was a small increased risk of GBS after swine flu vaccination, which was a special flu vaccine for a potential pandemic strain of flu virus. The National Academy of Medicine, formerly known as the Institute of Medicine, conducted a scientific review of this issue in 2003 and found that people who received the 1976 swine flu vaccine had an increased risk for developing GBS. The increased risk was approximately one additional case of GBS for every 100,000 people who got the swine flu vaccine. Scientists have several theories about the cause, but the exact reason for this link remains unknown.

There have been several studies of the risk of GBS after flu vaccine and CDC monitors for GBS during each flu season. The data on an association between seasonal influenza vaccine and GBS have been variable from season to season. When there has been an increased risk, it has consistently been in the range of 1-2 additional GBS cases per million flu vaccine doses administered.

Studies suggest that it is more likely that a person will get GBS after getting the flu than after vaccination. It is important to keep in mind that severe illness and death are associated with flu, and getting vaccinated is the best way to prevent flu infection and its complications.

These 2 Flu Vaccines Are Killing People in South Korea

SINGAPORE - Health authorities have advised against the use of two influenza vaccines - SKYCellflu Quadrivalent and VaxigripTetra - after people who received them in South Korea died.

No deaths associated with influenza vaccination have been recorded here, noted the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) on Sunday (Oct 25), adding: "This is a precautionary measure following reported deaths after influenza vaccination in South Korea."

Information from South Korean authorities noted that seven brands of influenza vaccine had been administered to the people who died in South Korea.

Two of the seven brands are available in Singapore: SKYCellflu Quadrivalent is manufactured by SK Bioscience and distributed here by AJ Biologics; VaxigripTetra is made by Sanofi Pasteur and locally distributed by Sanofi Aventis.

The HSA is assessing the implications of the reported deaths in South Korea and the MOH has told healthcare providers and medical practitioners to temporarily stop using the two vaccines.

But the two other vaccines that have been brought into Singapore for the influenza season can still be used, they added.

ike any medicines, vaccines can cause side effects, such as soreness and redness at the injection site, fever, headaches, muscle aches, fatigue and nausea.

"These side effects are generally mild and resolve on their own. In rare instances, a person may experience high fever or severe allergic reactions (such as breathing difficulty, wheezing and swelling around the eyes) and immediate medical attention should be sought," said the agencies.

They added that vaccines approved for use here have been evaluated by the HSA to ensure that they meet the required international standards of quality, safety and efficacy.

The HSA monitors vaccine safety through a monitoring system that draws on the network of local healthcare professionals and international regulatory counterparts to pick up adverse events suspected to be associated with the medications.

Related Articles

Can We Really Develop a Safe, Effective Coronavirus Vaccine?

PhD Scientist "A Vaccine Could Be Causing The Covid-19 Pandemic"

Spike in Flu Shot Deaths Begs Skepticism

In South Korea, 36 people have died of flu shots in  2020 and 65 people in 2019 & vaccines were only 29% effective. 

At least 36 people have died after taking flu vaccinations since last Friday, including a 17-year-old. The average age of those who died was 74, according to the South Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA).

As of Friday, more than 14 million people had gotten the flu vaccine, of which 9.4 million were children, elderly, and pregnant women, according to the KDCA.  Ki Moran, a professor at South Korea's National Cancer Centre, said the flu vaccine is known to cause serious side effects in one out of 10 million people.

In 2019, 227,000 people over the age of 65 died in South Korea, she added. That's an average of 621 deaths a day, to put the recent figures into perspective. The KDCA decided on Friday not to suspend the flu vaccinations. The vaccination expert committee will hold a meeting Saturday morning to review additional data, according to a KDCA statement.

The KDCA's Friday meeting came after rising scrutiny from experts and politicians.

On Friday, South Korean Prime Minister Chung Sye-kyun called for a thorough investigation into the deaths, citing public anxiety, according to a press release by the Health Ministry. He did not call for a halt to the vaccination campaign.

The Korean Medical Association, a coalition of 130,000 doctors, has urged the government to suspend the vaccination program for a week until they determined the cause of the deaths.

In a statement, the Korean Vaccine Society emphasized the importance of the flu vaccine, especially "for children, the elderly, and patients with chronic diseases and low immune system." The organization cited concerns about the possible spread of flu during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Experts globally are preparing for flu season in the middle of the pandemic. "This is a critical year for us to try to take flu as much off the table as we can," said Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in an interview with the AMA's JAMA Network.

One reason is to decrease the strain on public health services and hospitals, which are bracing for a winter wave. Experts say it possible to get Covid-19 and the flu simultaneously -- and, because flu symptoms look so similar to that of Covid-19, it will be impossible to rule out a coronavirus diagnosis without a test. That means a case of the flu can cause substantial disruption to work and school.

In South Korea, Covid-19 has infected 25,775 people and killed 457, according to Johns Hopkins University.

At least seven companies’ products were reportedly tied to the deaths, including France-based Sanofi and six domestic firms—SK Bioscience, Shinsung Pharm, Korea Vaccine, GC Pharma, Boryung Biopharma and LG Chem. Sanofi didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Back in September, before the deaths began, the KDCA temporarily halted its free national flu inoculation program, citing cold-chain problems. Turns out, a batch of Shinsung’s vaccines were left at room temperature during transportation when they should have been refrigerated. A recall followed, but some 2,300 doses had already been given, according to The New York Times. High temperatures would render a flu vaccine ineffective but not likely toxic.

Most of the deaths happened in elderly people, who are covered by the country’s free vaccination scheme. KDCA said Thursday that at least seven of the nine people it investigated had underlying health problems, according to Reuters.

According to this article, the flu shot effectiveness for 2018-2019 flu vaccine was roughly 29% effective.

How effective is this year's flu shot? Here's what we know so far. 

Related Articles

2 flu vaccines are killing people in South Korea

Can We Really Develop a Safe, Effective Coronavirus Vaccine?

PhD Scientist "A Vaccine Could Be Causing The Covid-19 Pandemic"

Facebook Bans Ads Questioning Safety Of COVID-19 Vaccines

Clearly, Mark Zuckerberg had enough of being dragged in front of Congress and hectored by a gang of senior citizens, and listening to the ACLU leader slam his business as a vessel for violent hate speech. Since Facebook has done a full 180 on its stance on speech, especially sensitive political speech, over the past few months. Apparently, Zuckerberg was shaken by his non-interventionist stance by declaring that during the last week of the campaign, FB would not allow new political advertising, and only yesterday by declaring that Facebook would clamp down on its site on holocaust deniers.

Salvos against QAnon and electoral disinformation have also been launched by the organization, thus taking an active approach to political advertisements and political material in general. 

And as global authorities try to persuade the public that, despite the expedited approval process, a potential COVID-19 vaccine would be safe to take, Facebook has agreed to give them a hand by deleting all material that allows users to refuse to take a vaccine. In a blog post published Tuesday, it set out the latest global agenda.

Facebook would draw the line and enable users who argue against "mandatory vaccination," a valid political stance the company said was (not a claim made in "poor faith" as some on the left insist), and post as usual. They quoted an instance of a Virginia state lawmaker who posted "STOP FORCED CORONAVIRUS VACCINATIONS."

Although the above advertising will be permissible under the new legislation, it will forbid advertisements that directly prevent people from taking vaccines by presenting the vaccines as ineffective or dangerous. 

"If a vaccine is specifically prevented by an ad that advocates for/against legislation or government policy, it will be refused," a CNBC spokesperson wrote. "That includes presenting vaccines as useless, ineffective, dangerous or unhealthy, describing vaccines for diseases as harmless, or as harmful or deadly ingredients in vaccines." 

Facebook also plans to push recommendations on how and when to get the flu vaccine for all individuals.

There is no coincidence with the timing. Analysts at Goldman Sachs wrote in a recent research note that confidence in the vaccine may be a significant obstacle to its eventual eradication. "We agree that the greatest obstacle will be to persuade the broad population to take the vaccine to effectively minimize the burden of disease and virus circulation to very low levels. Our basic case assumes such large acceptance, but this will probably entail a safe and very efficient vaccine, faith in the mechanism of approval and rollout, no out-of-pocket costs, and efficient public and community campaigns."

And news about JNJ 's recent halt was definitely not encouraging, especially because the public was still not aware of what was going on in the US with the halted AstraZeneca-Oxford trials. 

As we have noted, the decision of Facebook comes as Bill Gates challenges Trump's FDA's authority, and Kamala Harris tells the American people that she "will not take" a vaccine approved by Trump.

Throughout Africa, a host of other terribly paralyzing and debilitating diseases have been reported in vaccines developed by Gates but never tested on humans until used in Africa. 

This is India's medical study addressing the paralysis arising from the vaccinations of Gates, affecting 450,000 children and babies for life. This is why Gates was sued for his Crimes Against Humanity by India. The last page summarizes the damage sustained by 1/2 million young Indians. The remainder of the study is a very technical, accurate, and horrible medical report. 

Because of his Crimes Against Humanity carried out with his vaccines around the world, India, Russia and China have barred Gates from entering or using his vaccines for life.

Does Trump Now Regret Getting The Flu Shot?

There have been lots of unpopular articles written about the flu shot and it has not been covered in the mainstream media and a few scientists have spoken out. Could elements of the flu shot be causing people to test positive?  The mainstream media and social media will call this a conspiracy theory because it is largely an unpopular view.  

Trump was skeptical of his flu shot and felt obligated to get one earlier this year.  Dr. Fauci of the CDC has been promoting the safety and benefits of the flu shot despite a 10-40% annual effectiveness rate.  Big pharma is the largest TV advertiser and is doing a great job of spreading fear and conditioning the American public that they must medicate everything.  

President Donald Trump cast doubt on the effectiveness of influenza vaccinations, claiming that since he was needed to be president, he never had the seasonal flu and just got a flu shot. "I'm not sure if I should have. Oh, who knows?

During an interview with the Washington Examiner on May 14, Trump's comment on flu shots came up.

Trump, May 14: I never lost anybody to the flu. Look, I’ve had people having the flu. I said, “Hey, how are you doing with the flu?” They had the flu. I never had the flu. You know, the first thing they did, they want to give me a flu shot. I never had the flu. And I come to the White House, “Sir, we have to give you a flu shot.” I said, “Why?” And I took it. I don’t know if I should have. Who knows? Three times now. I’ve taken three flu shots, but anyway. …

“All my life I see — I was lucky; I never had the flu,” Trump said during a Fox News virtual town hall on May 3. “Then I came here; they want to give a flu shot. And I said, ‘I don’t want a flu shot,’ but they have to give it.”

Back in 2015 before President Donald Trump had announced his intentions to run for the highest elected office in the country, he announced an intention of a different sort. 

On Sirius XM’s “Opie and Anthony” show, he stated that he would not be getting a flu vaccination that year, using some fairly strong verbiage in the process. 

Here is, in part, what Trump said in response to a query about whether or not he would be getting a flu shot himself in 2015: 

“I’ve never had one… I don’t like the idea of injecting bad stuff into [my] body. I have friends that religiously get the flu shot and then they get the flu… I’ve seen a lot of reports that the last flu shot is virtually totally ineffective.” He went on to add, “I’ve passed on it, but that doesn’t mean [other] people should.” 

At the time, Donald Trump’s opinion on flu vaccinations was seen as nothing more than the opinion of a celebrity. Now that he is President of the United States, however, his opinion carries more weight and it is this fact that has raised concerns across the country.

Thanks in large part to conflicting information—online and elsewhere—on the flu vaccine, each year there is a fairly significant portion of the population that chooses not to receive the influenza vaccine, even though the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that almost all individuals over the age of 6 months receive the shot each year.

Trump's Flu Shot Reticence from r/politics

Microsoft's PC Software Founded on April 4, 1975 Still Cannot Protect You From Viruses 45 Years Later

How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health

What is stakeholder capitalism?

Is profit or charity motivating Bill Gates to vaccinate the World?  I think Bill Gates has good intentions but the semantics don't look very good right now.

The same man who founded Microsoft and couldn't protect his own PC software company from viruses is trying to vaccinate the World?  Gates made billions of dollars from a planned obsolescence scheme for his Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 2000, XP, Vista software.

Microsoft generates its revenues from PC sales to the average user once every three years. Corporations and businesses spend millions of dollars to protect and upgrade their Windows environments annually. Protection against viruses is often the primary motivation to upgrade.

Microsoft PC software founded on April 4, 1975, still cannot protect you from a virus almost 45 years later.  Could never plug the holes in its' software that infects millions of computers with viruses each year.  These viruses take over your computer and require you to purchase the upgrade for the next version of the software in order to get rid of all the viruses on your computer.  Billions of dollars were lost as a result of decade long computer pandemic.  

Huge anti-virus computer software companies like Symantec and McAfee were started to stop the spread of Windows PC viruses.  Companies and tech support people made and lost billions of dollars from faulty PC software that couldn't prevent viruses from infiltrating computers.  This was a huge scam based on faulty software.  

Meanwhile, this opened the door for companies like Apple which had a much better method of protecting computers from viruses.  How many viruses have you ever had on your iPad, iPhone or Mac?

I grew up in the Midwest where trust is a huge principle of society.  Bill Gates has not earned my trust based on the way he has built his business over the last 50 years.  I also wrote this post because I can't stand hypocrisy. 

I am not anti-vaccination for the most part.  However, right now I am skeptical of vaccines and think there needs to be a lot more input from many more sources on this issue.

PhD Scientist "A Vaccine Could Be Causing The Covid-19 Pandemic"

Judy Mikovits's contrarian view theory is a radically opposing view of current CDC recommendations.  These are not recommendations but simply an opportunity to hear someone who doesn't agree.

LET'S BE CLEAR - Judy does not disagree with all vaccines. However, this virus appears to be derived from a vaccine according to her.

Her credibility is also into question with this story.  Was a Scientist Jailed After Discovering a Deadly Virus Delivered Through Vaccines?  This Snopes article claims Judy Mikovits did not discover a deadly virus delivered through vaccines; she was arrested for allegedly stealing equipment belonging to the Institute that fired her.  This Snopes article could be a fake as Judy does claim in the video that she might have been framed.  Hard to know who to believe.

There are several articles also debunking her claims but they all seem to focus on her credibility and don't really address why her theory could be wrong?

Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., spent twenty years at the National Cancer Institute, working with Dr. Frank Ruscetti, one of the founding fathers of human retrovirology, and has co-authored more than forty scientific papers.

YouTube Keeps Removing The Video so Click on Site to Watch
 Judy's 2nd Interview  
 Mikki Willis Producer of Plandemic Video Above

"Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and Big Pharma don't want you to read this book. Get PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION now and learn the truth about public health industrial complex's decades of research fraud and vaccine cover-ups."

Dr. Judy Mikovits is a modern-day Rosalind Franklin, a brilliant researcher shaking up the old boys' club of science with her groundbreaking discoveries. And like many women who have trespassed into the world of men, she uncovered decades-old secrets that many would prefer to stay buried.

From her doctoral thesis, which changed the treatment of HIV-AIDS, saving the lives of millions, including basketball great Magic Johnson, to her spectacular discovery of a new family of human retroviruses, and her latest research which points to a new golden age of health, Dr. Mikovits has always been on the leading edge of science.

With the brilliant wit one might expect if Erin Brockovich had a doctorate in molecular biology, Dr. Mikovits has seen the best and worst of science. When she was part of the research community that turned HIV-AIDS from a fatal disease into a manageable one, she saw science at its best. But when her investigations questioned whether the use of animal tissue in medical research was unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases, such as autism and chronic fatigue syndrome, she saw science at its worst. If her suspicions are correct, we are looking at a complete realignment of scientific practices, including how we study and treat human disease.

Recounting her nearly four decades in science, including her collaboration of more than thirty-five years with Dr. Frank Ruscetti, one of the founders of the field of human retrovirology, this is a behind the scenes look at the issues and egos which will determine the future health of humanity.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. concludes his foreword to the Plague of Corruption with, "This account by Judy Mikovits and Kent Heckenlively is vitally important both to the health of our children and the vitality of our democracy. My father believed moral courage to be the rarest species of bravery. Rarer even than the physical courage of soldiers in battle or great intelligence. He thought it the one vital quality required to salvage the world. If we are to continue to enjoy democracy and protect our children from the forces that seek to commoditize humanity, then we need courageous scientists like Judy Mikovits who are willing to speak truth to power, even at terrible personal cost."

Please comment below.

(Updated on May 7) Since watching this video I have asked two friends who have had the Covid-19 virus if they had a flu shot.  Both said yes.  2 people getting flu shots and 2 Covid-19 cases do not prove a theory but it begs for more people being asked the same question.

Are nursing homes forcing residents to get flu shots?  Dr. Judy Mikovits did say that if you had the flu shot you’re 36% more likely to get Covid-19.

Please comment below if you have had the flu shot recently and tested positive for the virus.

Related Article: 

Spike in Flu Shot Deaths Begs Skepticism 

Can We Really Develop a Safe, Effective Coronavirus Vaccine?

Why We Need a Placebo Covid-19 Vaccine