US Military (DOD) Caught in Severe Data Manipulation Scandal

A recent report by Daniel Horowitz at The Blaze on the Department of Defense manipulating epidemiological data after the initial data for 2021 revealed a MASSIVE increase, by 988%, in doctor visits by US military members in 2021.

Database artifact, smoking gun, or something in between?

What happened in 2021? Could it be the mandatory COVID vaccines? A recent report by Daniel Horowitz at The Blaze on the Department of Defense manipulating epidemiological data after the initial data for 2021 revealed a MASSIVE increase, by 988%, in doctor visits by US military members in 2021.

The initial data was presented during Sen. Ron Johnson’s five-hour hearing on a “COVID-19: Second Opinion” by Ohio attorney Thomas Renz, who has been representing clients suing the vaccine mandates.

In response to the report, the US military claimed the five previous years were plagued by a giant clitch.

According to the Department of Defense, the actual number of doctor visits and ambulatory care in the military is at least TEN TIMES higher than was being reported since 2016!

There is undoubtedly a public health and national security crisis in the military, and the Pentagon’s reaction only seems to be concerned with exonerating the vaccine, not fixing its own alleged problem.

It’s now certain that the military’s health surveillance system — DMED — showed a massive increase in sickness and injury diagnoses in 2021 over previous years, particularly in the neurological, cardiovascular, oncological, and reproductive health categories. The military, in a very terse and cryptic statement to PolitiFact last week, admitted as much, but claimed without any further explanation that the data in the system accessed by several military doctors working with attorney Thomas Renz was only a “fraction” of the true numbers that existed. In the words of the Pentagon spokesman, it was a “glitch in the database.” Where those true numbers existed, why they weren’t in the system for five years, what exactly was in the system, and why the 2021 numbers were accurate according to the DOD account remain a mystery.

However, one by one, the military public health officials have been adding back random numbers to the 2016 through 2020 codes. I’m told by Renz and two of the whistleblowers that throughout the past week, they have queried the same data again, and in most of the ICD categories, they have found that the numbers from 2016 through 2020 were “increased” exponentially to look as though 2021 was not an abnormal year. This has been done without any transparency, any press release, any statement of narrative, and sloppily in a way that makes the already unbelievable narrative simply impossible to believe.

In addition to believing that every epidemiological report for five years was somehow completely tainted with false data — including during the first year of the pandemic itself — we would have to believe that the minute they discovered this from Renz, they suddenly discovered the exact numbers. A five-year mistake fixed overnight!

Still Loaded With Antibodies 1 Year Later After Covid 19 Infection

SEE OTHER TEST RESULTS BELOW

Why Is Natural Immunity Still Being Ignored By The Corrupt Government & Corporate Media?

Blood test results from Labcorp show an unvaccinated family of four people still have antibodies 1 year later after infection.  Family of people with ages ranging from 12-48 still are loaded with antibodies.  

Can this family get a vaccine mandate exemption?

Our grossly corrupt FDA and Government Advises Against Use of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test Results.  For one reason only?  $MONEY$

Here is the language used by the criminals running the CDC.  All eligible people should be vaccinated, including unvaccinated people who have previously been infected and have detectable antibodies.

Numerous immunologic studies (NO STUDIES LINKED?) have consistently shown that vaccination of individuals who were previously infected enhances their immune response, and growing epidemiologic evidence indicates that vaccination following infection further reduces the risk of subsequent infection, including in the setting of increased circulation of more infectious variants.

CDC Website Shows Possible Myocarditisp Side Effects From Those Previously Infected

Risk of an MIS-like illness or the known risks of COVID-19 vaccination such as the rare risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination for people who meet the following criteria:

1. Clinical recovery has been achieved, including return to normal cardiac function;
2. It has been ≥90 days since their diagnosis of MIS-C;
3. They are in an area of high or substantial community transmission of SARS-CoV-2, or otherwise have an increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 exposure and transmission; and
4. Onset of MIS-C occurred before any COVID-19 vaccination.

People diagnosed with MIS-C or MIS-A after COVID-19 vaccination

In the rare instance of a person developing MIS-C, MIS-A, or a similar clinical illness after receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine, referral to a specialist in infectious diseases, rheumatology, or cardiology should be considered. Because MIS-C and MIS-A are conditions known to occur with SARS-CoV-2 infection, these individuals should be assessed for laboratory evidence of current or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Healthcare and public health professionals should also consider requesting a consultation from the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment COVIDvax project. In addition, all illnesses consistent with MIS-C or MIS-A occurring in persons who received any COVID-19 vaccine should be reported to VAERS.

FDA today: 42% of children 5-11 have natural immunity

6 EU countries suspended Moderna COVID-19 vaccine for young people

France, Finland, Germany, Sweden, Iceland and Denmark no longer recommend the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine

More countries suspended Moderna COVID-19 vaccine for young people. 

News breaking: This morning, the Moderna vaccine has been banned by another country. The German Vaccination Committee (STIKO) advises people under 30 not to use this COVID-19 vaccine because it is rare. Risk of heart disease!

And just yesterday, the French and Swedish governments have just announced that people under the age of 30 will stop using the Moderna vaccine.

The highest health advisory body in France officially announced yesterday that it would not recommend that people under the age of 30 in the country be vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine produced by the American Moderna Pharmaceutical Factory.

The reason is that the vaccine has a higher risk of side effects in people of this age group, which will cause Heart-related diseases.

Immediately, the Swedish health officer also quickly decided to suspend indefinitely the Moderna vaccine for people under 30.

At the same time, the Nordic countries Finland, Iceland and Denmark have also taken similar measures-Norway is encouraging men under the age of 30 not to get the vaccine, but it has not yet made mandatory requirements because the country already has data showing that it is vaccinated. Of young men are at increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis.

As of today, a total of six countries including France, Finland, Germany, Sweden, Iceland and Denmark no longer recommend the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine to people under the age of 30, because it will cause them to have a higher risk of developing myocarditis.

The following figure shows the number and proportion of deaths, injuries and various disabilities in the vaccine adverse reaction system as of October 8, 2021:

We must know that the German decision to stop the Moderna vaccine was made at a time when the number of new coronavirus cases reported in the country hit a record high. Because Moderna vaccine has caused myocarditis in young people in Germany one after another, the German permanent vaccination committee, therefore, only recommends Pfizer vaccine for people under 30 years old.

And just yesterday, the French and Swedish governments have just announced that people under the age of 30 will stop using the Moderna vaccine.

The highest health advisory body in France officially announced yesterday that it would not recommend that people under the age of 30 in the country be vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine produced by the American Moderna Pharmaceutical Factory.

However, for people over the age of 30, STIKO said that even if they were vaccinated with Moderna, the risk of heart disease did not increase. However, it is still recommended that pregnant women, regardless of whether they are above or below 30 years old, choose only to vaccinate Pfizer. 

It is reported that these data are released by Paul Ehrlich Insitute, a government agency responsible for monitoring and evaluating vaccine side effects and complications.Not only these European countries, the United States is also delaying the approval of the Moderna childhood vaccine. The Pfizer vaccine is recommended for children 5-11 years old. According to the VAERS website, nearly 4,000 Americans in the United States have died after being vaccinated with Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine.

Dr. McCullough, an American cardiologist and former deputy director of the Department of Internal Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center, said: The number of heart inflammation cases in the United States has increased by 21,000% within 4 months, mainly affecting young men. “In June 2021, the Centers for Disease Control said there were 200 Cases of myocarditis. But by October, we have 10,304 cases.”

Covid Vaccines Drop Below Zero Efficacy & Not Durable at 200 Days

A Sweeden study shows covid vaccines drop below zero efficacy on spread by about 200 days.  Is this why Pfizer eliminated clinical trial control groups after 90 days?

The swedes just did a large vaccine study using 842,972 pairs of people (1.7 million total). each pair had one vaxxed, one unvaxxed. it’s currently a preprint for “the lancet.” you can grab it HERE.

This was a retrospective study, but one in which the matching of cohorts was pretty good which improves the evidence quality quite a bit. it’s not a full RCT, but it’s a lot better than most of what’s getting published right now.

Age was about the same, comorbidities similar, and gender near exact. the only major variance seems to be that 10% of vaxxed vs 4% of unvaxxed were “homemaker service” which looks to be the high risk “assisted living” group. also, 84% of vaxxed were born in sweden vs 69% of unvaxxed. given the higher covid rates in immigrants, this seems to favor vaccines. so too does the usual definitional game of only counting those who are 14 days or more after a second dose as vaccinated.

Vaccines start off reasonably effective, but they fade very quickly. this has long been a criticism and a complaint about the shortness of the drug trials on which their approval was based and the elimination of their control groups to prevent long term study.

Companies like pfizer are VERY good at clinical trials. They do not make mistakes. They make choices.

Given these longer term results, it seems clear why they chose to run short trials and then eliminate the control groups after about 90 days. because that’s when things start to go off the rails. This becomes obvious in the curves from the study:

The downslope in efficacy against symptomatic infection is just starting right where pfizer and moderna ended their trials and vaccinated the control groups to make future comparison impossible. (red vertical line added by me) out around 240 days (red horiz line added by me) it goes negative.

Note that this is symptomatic only data, not “any found infection.” the fact that the VE is (despite being negative) is still far higher than negative VE’s seen in “all cases” in the UK interests me. this may imply a large group of vaccinated asymptomatic carriers.

It also raises questions about whether the vaccines ever provide ANY sterilizing immunity at all or if they merely prevent symptoms. recall that both the mRNA drug trials only tested those reporting symptoms for covid to assess efficacy.  Again, seems like a choice, not an error.

But this is all well known. the evidence that vaccines fail to stop spread has been clear for some time and not even the CDC argues it anymore.

What this study added that was terribly interesting was data on the prevention of severe covid. and this too drops rapidly.

Read the full story here.

Ivermectin Drastically Reduces COVID Deaths in India and Africa

Kim Iversen shares a special segment of the show that cannot be viewed on YouTube. Their 'Community Guidelines' specifically prohibit any mention of Ivermectin, a safe and effective drug that is being widely used in India and Africa to control COVID-19. Below is a look at the medicine's effectiveness and the smear campaign against it.

MSN Showcases the Amazing Uttar Pradesh Turnaround—The Ivermectin-based Home Medicine Kits

Impressive. Look at India's state of Uttar Pradesh this time last year compared to this year. This is one of the ONLY instances I have seen that looks like this...a solid decrease. Look at Vermont, the most vaxxed state in US. Delta in both. Vax in VT, Ivermectin in UT.... pic.twitter.com/Ev3253Kq4k

— Kim Iversen (@KimIversenShow) September 17, 2021

Kim Iversen Unpacks Israel's Alarming Vaccination Data

Political Commentator Kim Iversen Unpacks ‘Alarming and Shocking’ COVID Data From Israel.

Political talk show host Kim Iversen, who has been closely following COVID vaccine data in multiple countries, walks viewers through the data from Israel suggesting the vaccines are failing.

Political talk show host Kim Iversen, on a segment of the Kim Iversen Show Wednesday, called the latest COVID data coming out of Israel “alarming and shocking.”

Iversen reminded viewers that Israel was nearly fully vaccinated by February, after striking a deal with Pfizer to make its citizens “essentially … a giant study group.”

“They have very high vaccination rates in the country,” Iversen said. “Kids are still not vaccinated. There are some super ultra-Orthodox holdouts, but otherwise everybody in Israel banded together and they took the Pfizer vaccine — two doses.”

But by summer, Iversen said, Israel health officials determined the vaccine had worn off. “They saw skyrocketing numbers of cases, even after they’d hit this so-called herd immunity threshold of 70%.”

At first, Iversen said, it looked as though the vaccines might at least be protecting against more severe symptoms, because for the most part, only the unvaccinated were having to be hospitalized.

“But then as time went on … the hospitals started to fill up with fully vaccinated people,” Iversen said, “and they saw more and more cases among the fully vaccinated, and more and more of them becoming very severe to the point where the majority of their cases in the hospitals and in the ICU and those dying were fully vaccinated people.”

Iversen has been tracking data in multiple countries besides Israel, including Iceland, Chile, Seychelles, Uruguay and others.

“I have a whole list of countries that I’ve been monitoring on this,” she said. “And it was really clear early on that the vaccine was not stopping the spread, but it did seem to keep people out of the hospital for a period of time.”

But then Israel found the vaccine was wearing off — so they told everybody they would need a third, booster shot, “in order to participate in society,” Iversen said.

That seemed to work for awhile — but now cases are rising again.

“I don’t know what to make of that, “Iversen said. “And I’m not going to speculate. I’m just going to share the data and I’m going to keep watching that data. And we’re going to see what happens. I mean, at this point, that’s all we can do. All we can do is see what happens now.”

Sweden Bans Travel From Heavily Vaccinated Isreal

 

Isreal vs Sweden Daily Case Rate

Isreal vs Sweden ICU Admissions

Sweden bans travelers from Israel.  Israel's population has been reported it is over 80% vaccinated even though this chart says 60%.  Vaccinated mutations are obviously becoming the problem because of the selectivity of the protein in the vaccines.  They are leaking and driving mutations. You won't read about this in the US because the vaccines have become politicized and our Government bureaucrats are too embarrassed that they might be wrong.  Vaccines should be used only for the high risk and let natural immunity play out.  

Read the article Are Vaccines Perpetuating the Pandemic?

JUST IN - Sweden bans travelers from Israel, one of the most vaccinated countries in the world, into the country from September 6 due to the record-breaking rise in #COVID19 cases. pic.twitter.com/XO2dhrYy8S

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) September 2, 2021

Data Charts Showing Delta Wave May Have Peaked?

In recent weeks, we have seen a barrage of evidence that the delta-variant-driven summer COVID "wave" (amplified, as it was, by increased testing)  has finally peaked. First, the CDC pointed to regional data from the south and the northeast to show that the COVID wave had peaked in the original "hotspots". Then we shared research from BofA analyst Hans Mikkelsen, who showed that the delta of the delta wave had finally dropped into negative territory. And of course, the whole time, Dr. Scott Gottlieb has been sharing projections showing the wave was set to peak in late August or early September.

But now, as the latest CDC data show, it's not just cases, but also hospitalizations, that are showing signs of a peak. The latest daily data show hospitalizations declining for the first time since June.

According to the Epoch Times, hospital admissions for COVID-19 patients in the United States are declining for the first time since late June, suggesting the latest surge has peaked. The seven-day average of new daily hospitalizations with confirmed COVID-19 dropped by 2.4% from a week earlier to about 12,280 - the first such drop since around June 27, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. It comes as fewer hospitalizations are being reported in Florida, Texas, and other Southern states, the agency said.

And it's not just hospitalizations and cases that are showing signs of peaking. The CDC's COVID-19 tracker shows that the seven-day average for both deaths and cases appears to be leveling out. Previous surges of cases, including in the spring of 2020, in late July to early August 2020, and January 2021, all leveled out and dropped, fitting a similar pattern.

During prior surges, the COVID-19 death rate appeared to be higher, according to the CDC’s data. For example, on Jan. 13 of this year, which saw the most COVID-19 deaths per day, the number of daily deaths was about 4,169, with about 240K daily cases. Amid the current surge, on Aug. 31 the CDC reported the number of daily deaths (seven-day average) to be about 985, with about 150K daily cases.

Even though recent studies have shown that vaccines are far from perfect, roughly 74.4% of all US adults have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. And natural immunity might be even more extensive than previously believed. A new study published in Nature last week revealed that about one-third of all Americans, or more than 100MM people, had likely been infected with COVID-19 by the end of 2020. Officially, about 19.6MM cases of the virus were confirmed across the country.

A blockbuster study from Israel recently showed that natural immunity confers better protection against the delta variant than vaccine-induced immunity.

After all this, our biggest question is: why does the mainstream press only report on hospitals kinda-sorta nearing capacity in their ICUs, and the endless parade of cities and states imposing mask mandates and vaccine mandates, or bans on mask and vaccine mandates. Maybe it's time to cover some 'good news' related to COVID for a change?

Data source

U.S. State COVID-19 Vaccines Rates By Age

I am very skeptical that these numbers are real.  Our last post on August, 11 showed 61.9% for California.  This is a jump of almost 16%+ 25,000,000 in 3 weeks. Not buying the data.

LocationAge < 18Age 18-64Age 65+

Alabama

10.9%

53.9%

89.4%

Alabama. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 10.9%. Ages 18 to 64: 53.9%. Age 65 and up: 89.4%

Alaska

15.4%

61.9%

93.7%

Alaska. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 15.4%. Ages 18 to 64: 61.9%. Age 65 and up: 93.7%

Arizona

16.6%

64.4%

95.0%

Arizona. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 16.6%. Ages 18 to 64: 64.4%. Age 65 and up: 95%

Arkansas

15.1%

59.0%

88.1%

Arkansas. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 15.1%. Ages 18 to 64: 59%. Age 65 and up: 88.1%

California

22.1%

78.8%

99.9%

California. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 22.1%. Ages 18 to 64: 78.8%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Colorado

20.8%

73.5%

97.9%

Colorado. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 20.8%. Ages 18 to 64: 73.5%. Age 65 and up: 97.9%

Connecticut

25.9%

81.4%

99.9%

Connecticut. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 25.9%. Ages 18 to 64: 81.4%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Delaware

18.6%

69.8%

99.9%

Delaware. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 18.6%. Ages 18 to 64: 69.8%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Florida

17.7%

69.7%

99.9%

Florida. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 17.7%. Ages 18 to 64: 69.7%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Georgia

13.3%

58.2%

91.7%

Georgia. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 13.3%. Ages 18 to 64: 58.2%. Age 65 and up: 91.7%

Hawaii

23.1%

81.5%

99.9%

Hawaii. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 23.1%. Ages 18 to 64: 81.5%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Idaho

0.4%

53.7%

92.2%

Idaho. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 0.4%. Ages 18 to 64: 53.7%. Age 65 and up: 92.2%

Illinois

21.6%

73.4%

98.5%

Illinois. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 21.6%. Ages 18 to 64: 73.4%. Age 65 and up: 98.5%

Indiana

12.5%

55.4%

90.5%

Indiana. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 12.5%. Ages 18 to 64: 55.4%. Age 65 and up: 90.5%

Iowa

14.7%

61.9%

95.4%

Iowa. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 14.7%. Ages 18 to 64: 61.9%. Age 65 and up: 95.4%

Kansas

15.3%

63.1%

99.9%

Kansas. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 15.3%. Ages 18 to 64: 63.1%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Kentucky

14.5%

63.2%

95.3%

Kentucky. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 14.5%. Ages 18 to 64: 63.2%. Age 65 and up: 95.3%

Louisiana

11.2%

54.0%

90.4%

Louisiana. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 11.2%. Ages 18 to 64: 54%. Age 65 and up: 90.4%

Maine

21.4%

77.4%

99.9%

Maine. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 21.4%. Ages 18 to 64: 77.4%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Maryland

22.7%

77.0%

99.9%

Maryland. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 22.7%. Ages 18 to 64: 77%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Massachusetts

26.9%

83.9%

99.9%

Massachusetts. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 26.9%. Ages 18 to 64: 83.9%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Michigan

14.2%

60.0%

92.3%

Michigan. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 14.2%. Ages 18 to 64: 60%. Age 65 and up: 92.3%

Minnesota

18.8%

69.8%

99.9%

Minnesota. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 18.8%. Ages 18 to 64: 69.8%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Mississippi

10.8%

49.8%

86.7%

Mississippi. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 10.8%. Ages 18 to 64: 49.8%. Age 65 and up: 86.7%

Missouri

13.6%

57.7%

89.4%

Missouri. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 13.6%. Ages 18 to 64: 57.7%. Age 65 and up: 89.4%

Montana

12.9%

55.8%

92.2%

Montana. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 12.9%. Ages 18 to 64: 55.8%. Age 65 and up: 92.2%

Nebraska

16.1%

65.7%

96.2%

Nebraska. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 16.1%. Ages 18 to 64: 65.7%. Age 65 and up: 96.2%

Nevada

16.3%

68.1%

93.3%

Nevada. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 16.3%. Ages 18 to 64: 68.1%. Age 65 and up: 93.3%

New Hampshire

20.7%

72.0%

99.9%

New Hampshire. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 20.7%. Ages 18 to 64: 72%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

New Jersey

21.7%

80.1%

97.4%

New Jersey. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 21.7%. Ages 18 to 64: 80.1%. Age 65 and up: 97.4%

New Mexico

22.7%

78.9%

99.9%

New Mexico. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 22.7%. Ages 18 to 64: 78.9%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

New York

19.4%

76.0%

93.7%

New York. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 19.4%. Ages 18 to 64: 76%. Age 65 and up: 93.7%

North Carolina

15.8%

62.3%

93.7%

North Carolina. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 15.8%. Ages 18 to 64: 62.3%. Age 65 and up: 93.7%

North Dakota

10.6%

52.7%

90.4%

North Dakota. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 10.6%. Ages 18 to 64: 52.7%. Age 65 and up: 90.4%

Ohio

12.9%

56.8%

90.8%

Ohio. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 12.9%. Ages 18 to 64: 56.8%. Age 65 and up: 90.8%

Oklahoma

13.1%

59.8%

93.5%

Oklahoma. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 13.1%. Ages 18 to 64: 59.8%. Age 65 and up: 93.5%

Oregon

20.1%

72.0%

96.6%

Oregon. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 20.1%. Ages 18 to 64: 72%. Age 65 and up: 96.6%

Pennsylvania

19.2%

74.3%

99.9%

Pennsylvania. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 19.2%. Ages 18 to 64: 74.3%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Rhode Island

23.7%

78.1%

99.9%

Rhode Island. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 23.7%. Ages 18 to 64: 78.1%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

South Carolina

12.8%

55.3%

95.9%

South Carolina. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 12.8%. Ages 18 to 64: 55.3%. Age 65 and up: 95.9%

South Dakota

14.5%

62.7%

99.9%

South Dakota. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 14.5%. Ages 18 to 64: 62.7%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Tennessee

11.3%

54.7%

88.9%

Tennessee. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 11.3%. Ages 18 to 64: 54.7%. Age 65 and up: 88.9%

Texas

18.3%

68.5%

94.2%

Texas. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 18.3%. Ages 18 to 64: 68.5%. Age 65 and up: 94.2%

Utah

17.3%

70.8%

99.9%

Utah. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 17.3%. Ages 18 to 64: 70.8%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Vermont

26.7%

81.1%

99.9%

Vermont. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 26.7%. Ages 18 to 64: 81.1%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Virginia

22.1%

73.5%

98.4%

Virginia. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 22.1%. Ages 18 to 64: 73.5%. Age 65 and up: 98.4%

Washington

20.9%

79.3%

99.9%

Washington. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 20.9%. Ages 18 to 64: 79.3%. Age 65 and up: 99.9%

Washington, D.C.

16.8%

77.6%

94.1%

Washington, D.C.. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 16.8%. Ages 18 to 64: 77.6%. Age 65 and up: 94.1%

West Virginia

11.3%

46.8%

82.0%

West Virginia. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 11.3%. Ages 18 to 64: 46.8%. Age 65 and up: 82%

Wisconsin

16.1%

63.7%

98.7%

Wisconsin. At least 1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Under age 18: 16.1%. Ages 18 to 64: 63.7%. Age 65 and up: 98.7%

Wyoming

9.6%

47.7%

88.1%

Data source