Showing posts with label Schools. Show all posts

10 Things We Learned from the Overreaction to the Coronavirus Pandemic?

The coronavirus pandemic was a global crisis that prompted significant responses from governments, health organizations, and individuals. However, as the dust settles, it’s crucial to examine what we learned from the instances of overreaction during this period. Understanding these lessons can help us prepare better for future emergencies and strike a balance between caution and overreach.

Robert Malone Article Newsletter

HereIsTheEvidence.com

188 issues and counting!

Due to the irregular nature of the COVID-19 responses, this is a crowdsourcing tool for organizing the economic ramifications, scientific inconsistencies, and legal issues. Our desire is to see a rational and principled approach to COVID-19 where the rights of citizens and commerce are protected.

This is for aggregating publicly available items of evidence that would be admissible in courts, not general news stories.

Submitted items may be edited or deleted to ensure the quality of content. 188 issues and counting!

Virginia Democrats Pass Mask Freedom Bill

Virginia Senate approves amendment to bill allowing parental choice over masks

The Democrat-controlled Senate chamber voted 29 to 9 in favor of the amendment Tuesday, creating the option for parents to opt-out from school mask mandates, without giving an excuse and regardless of rules adopted by local school boards.

“In an overwhelming bipartisan show of support, the Senate of Virginia took a significant step today for parents and children. I applaud Senator Petersen’s amendment to give parents the right to decide whether their children should wear masks in schools,” said Gov. Glenn Youngkin, praising in a Tuesday press statement the “overwhelming” adoption of Petersen’s amendment to SB739.

“In the last week, we have seen Democrat-led states like Oregon, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Delaware move away from universal mask mandates in schools. I am pleased that there is bipartisan support for doing the same in Virginia. This shows that when we work across the aisle, we put Virginians first. I look forward to signing this bill when it comes to my desk,” he continued.

Governor Youngkin Praises Overwhelming Adoption of Senator Chap Petersen’s Amendment to SB739

Victory for parents and children statewide

Governor Glenn Youngkin today released the following statement on State Senator Chap Petersen’s Amendment to Senator Siobhan Dunnavant’s SB739, adopted 29-9, creating a parental opt-out from local school mask mandates:

“In an overwhelming bipartisan show of support, the Senate of Virginia took a significant step today for parents and children. I applaud Senator Petersen’s amendment to give parents the right to decide whether their children should wear masks in schools. In the last week, we have seen Democrat-led states like Oregon, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Delaware move away from universal mask mandates in schools. I am pleased that there is bipartisan support for doing the same in Virginia. This shows that when we work across the aisle, we put Virginians first. I look forward to signing this bill when it comes to my desk,” said Governor Glenn Youngkin.

A Magic Moment in Time To Remember When You Cast Your Next Vote

Never forgive politicians for stupidity. Change is near!

Children’s Health Defense California chapter employed attorney Nicole Pearson to challenge the LA school district’s ability to impose a vaccine mandate for kids.

The papers were filed last week for a preliminary injunction. At Nicole’s request, I was one of about 10 experts who filed an affidavit in support of CHD’s motion.

The hearing was today. The judge walked in with a 12-page proposed order denying CHD’s motion.

Nicole wasn’t going to let that happen. She made a brilliant argument that if the order were to be signed by the judge that every school district in California would be able to set the medical policy for all kids and the State would thus lose control. She also pointed out that schools shouldn’t be allowed to dictate medical policy for kids. If they can do it for vaccines, then they should be able to require birth control so kids don’t get pregnant and miss school, etc., etc.

The judge is now having second thoughts. He didn’t issue his order and is now going back to re-think his position. We are all optimistic he will strike down LAUSD’s ability to set medical policy for kids.

Congratulations Nicole! GREAT JOB.

Lawsuit LA Unified School District Over Mandates

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is bringing against the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD).

Yes, this is the same school district that is educating you on the benefits of vaccination WITHOUT telling you ANYTHING about the risks. In short, they are the ones giving you a one-sided view of the argument.

Also contributing affidavits in opposition of their mandate are:

Dr. Ledbetter

Dr. Fleming

Dr. Barke

Brian Isley

Dr. Tracy Darling

Dr. Jessica Rose

Nurse Tawny B.

Nurse Lexi T.

Nurse Devin T.

Nurse Jackie - TBD,

Ryan Cole - TBD

Dr. Aaron Kheriarty (UCI) -TBD

I’ve read the declarations from LAUSD. Two were submitted.

David Baca said what the policy was (get vaccinated or don’t participate on campus) but didn’t opine on the cost-benefit analysis.

Smita Malhotra, MD says everyone must wear masks because it is consistent with what the CDC says to do. And that all their policies are consistent with CDC guidelines. Because the FDA has “determined that the vaccines benefits outweigh the risks,” it must be safe. In short, we are doing this because we follow their guidance without asking any questions. We don’t do any checks on the science. A credible risk-benefit analysis from these agencies is not required. Who needs that when you have their assurances?

So there you go. Blind trust. We can safely ignore what the science and evidence say. No need to look at the data at all!

We have the facts and evidence on our side. They have the infallibility of the FDA and CDC on their side.

What matters now is what the court decides.

We’ll find out when the decision pops out around December 8. Stay tuned.

Nicole C. Pearson [SBN 265350]

Jessica R. Barsotti [SBN 209557]

Rita Barnett-Rose [SBN 195801]

LAW OFFICES OF NICOLE C. PEARSON

3421 Via Oporto, Ste. 201

Newport Beach, CA 92663

Telephone: (424) 272-5526

Nicole@FLTJllp.com; Jessica@FLTJllp.com;

Rita@FLTJllp.com

Attorneys for Petitioners CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, and PROTECTION OF THE EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS OF KIDS (P.E.R.K.)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE-CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, on its own and on behalf of its members, and PROTECTION OF THE EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS OF KIDS (P.E.R.K.), a California 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of its members,

Petitioners,

vs.

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a local educational agency and school district for the County of Los Angeles; MEGAN REILLY, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Los Angeles Unified School District; GEORGE MCKENNA, in his official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; MONICA GARCIA, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; SCOTT SCHMERELSON in his official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; NICK MELVOIN, in his official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; JACKIE GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; KELLY GONEZ, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; TANYA ORTIZ FRANKLIN, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; Respondents,

Respondents.

Case No.: 21STCP03429

DECLARATION OF STEVEN T. KIRSCH IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Date: December 8, 2021

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Dept.: 86

Complaint Filed: October 13, 2021

Trial Date: Not yet set

DECLARATION OF STEVEN T. KIRSCH

I, STEVEN T. KIRSCH, declare as follows:

1. I am an adult over 18 years of age and have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein this declaration, which are offered in support of the Reply in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction of Petitioners CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE – CA CHAPTER (“CHD”), and PROTECTION OF THE EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS OF KIDS (“PERK”) (hereinafter collectively “Petitioners”). If called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify under oath to the facts stated herein.

BACKGROUND

2. I attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) from 1974 to 1980 and earned a SB/SM from MIT. The main computer science auditorium at MIT is named after me.

3. I am a retired high technology executive, but, prior to my retirement, founded seven (7) high technology companies, two with billion-dollar market caps.

4. I am independently wealthy. I have no conflicts of interest. My sole motivation is to save lives. Making a positive difference in the lives of others gives me a sense of purpose and fulfills me. I have received many awards for my philanthropy over the past 20 years, the most notable being awarded the recipient of a “National Caring Award” from the Caring Institute in 2003. Senator Hilary Clinton presented me with the award in Washington DC in front of a very large audience.

5. In March of 2020, I was working as Chief Executive Officer at a digital money startup company, M10, when COVID impacted our operations.

6. In April 2020, I decided to put my company on hold to do things that could save lives. I donated $1M to start the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund. I raised another $5M and we funded research into early treatments for COVID.

7. The COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund funded fluvoxamine, an inexpensive, safe drug with virtually no side effects at the effective dose that can reduce the death rate from COVID by 12 times making it far more effective than any vaccine (e.g., the Pfizer vaccine only had only a 2X reduction in mortality in the clinical trials). (See 60 Minutes: Funding a Possible Early Treatment for COVID-19 in a 40-year-old Antidepressant, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fluvoxamine-antidepressant-drug-covid-treatment-60-minutes-2021-03-07/ aired on March 7, 2021).

PERSONAL VACCINATION

8. On March 29, 2021, I completed my second dose of Moderna. At the time, I was convinced by government assurances that the vaccines were safe and effective. I had no reason at all to question the experts. I had always complied with advice from the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”).

9. In early May, 2021, I began hearing stories from my friends who related stories of either themselves or loved ones who died or became permanently disabled shortly after being vaccinated. All of these cases were statistically unlikely if the government assurances of safety were true. However, I knew my friends weren’t lying, so that left only two possibilities: 1) the government was lying or 2) I am a very unlucky person. I put my job on hold and devoted full time to uncovering which option was more likely.

RESARCH FINDINGS

10. By May 25, 2021, it was more than clear to me what was going on, so I wrote a 287-page document detailing what I had learned on TrialSiteNews entitled “Should you get vaccinated?” That article had over 1 million views and over 18,000 “likes.” That is pretty amazing for a 287-page article! My article laid out the evidence behind my assertion that these COVID vaccines were more deadly than any vaccine in human history and should be immediately halted.

11. Specifically, I found that the vaccine doesn’t stay in your arm like most vaccines, but gets delivered everywhere in your body, including your brain, heart, lung, and reproductive organs. Secondly, the payload delivered by the vaccine causes cells to express a protein which is cytotoxic causes inflammation and blood clots, which leads to a wide range of neurological, cardiovascular, immunological, and reproductive symptoms. Ultimately, I found that COVID-19 vaccines kill more people than they save.

12. I also verified with a local neurologist who told me that in her 11 year in her current practice, her office has never had to make a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) report. This year, they need to make 2,000 VAERS reports and they have 20,000 patients. This is exceptional. It is clear, irrefutable evidence that these vaccines are thousands of times more dangerous than any vaccine that has been used in the last 10 years.

13. After publication of my article, for the very first time in my life, I was labelled as a spreader of misinformation and people told me that they no longer would speak to me. When I asked if there was anything wrong with my logic, nobody could point out a flaw in what I wrote. They said I was an evil person for opposing the supposedly “safe and effective” vaccines.

CORROBORATION OF FINDINGS

14. The conclusions of my original article that the COVID-19 vaccines kill more people than they save were subsequently confirmed by two papers published in peer-reviewed medical journals: one “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?” by Ronald Kostoff et al. and “The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations: Should We Rethink the Policy?” by Harald Walach et al. , both published in August 2021.

15. The conclusions of my original article that vaccines kill more people than they save were also subsequently confirmed by official government data: the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) stunning admission that in the clinical trials for Pfizer, more people died who got the vaccine than who got the placebo. Let me repeat that: The FDA admitted that vaccine killed more people than it saved.

16. On page 23 of the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action submitted by Dr. Ramchandra Naik on May 18, 2021, it says “From Dose 1 through the March 13, 2021 data cutoff date, there were a total of 38 deaths, 21 in the COMIRNATY group and 17 in the placebo group.” Since there were just two COVID deaths in the placebo group and 1 COVID death in the vaccine group, a net total of 1 death from COVID was saved by the vaccine. However, when all causes of death were considered, there were 4 net deaths (21-17). If there is 1 life saved, this means than 5 people died (since 1-5 = -4). In short, 5 people

lost their lives, one person was saved, resulting in a net loss of 4 people. Another way to look at this is that 5 times as many people lost their lives from all-cause mortality due to the vaccine as compared to the number who were saved from dying from COVID.

17. The bottom line is that Pfizer’s own clinical trial showed no evidence whatsoever that the vaccine was saving lives overall. In fact, it showed the reverse: the vaccine kills around 5 people (who die from the vaccine) for every 1 person saved from COVID.

18. The Pfizer trial also showed that for every 22,000 fully-vaccinated people, we would save a total of approximately 1 life from COVID. This means with 220M vaccinated people, we’d save only 10,000 lives from death from COVID, but this would be at a cost of at least 50,000 lives resulting in a net loss of 40,0000 lives after 220M full vaccinations.

19. In short, the vaccines are nonsensical. They do appear to save people from dying from COVID, however, at the cost of killing them from cardiac, neurologic, or immunologic causes caused by the vaccine itself. In short, the cure is worse than the disease.

20. The CDC is focusing the public’s attention exclusively on lives saved “from Covid” and completely ignoring the people killed and disabled from the vaccines.

21. Because the numbers in the Pfizer clinical trial were small and not statistically significant, they needed to be validated using larger sample sizes – real-world data – so I sought out assistance from researchers from all over the world and assembled 8 different methods and different data sources. Through this research we identified at least 150,000 excess deaths in the US were caused by the vaccine.

22. The results showed that we killed a minimum of 150,000 from the vaccine itself, but we saved 10,000 people from dying from COVID. This is an even worse tradeoff than the 5 to 1 calculated from the Pfizer clinical trial data. This is a 15 to 1 ratio. The detailed calculations and methodology are laid out in my article, “Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America.” These are only estimates, but these are conservative estimates, since I used the lowest death estimate of the 8 methods I used (the highest death estimates were over 300,000 people).

23. Just because the vaccine is deadly overall, it still might have a positive risk-benefit for certain age groups. However, because there was no risk-benefit analysis by age performed by the CDC (and still isn’t), I did the calculations myself, being very conservative in my calculations (e.g., assume the vaccine saves 100% of all COVID deaths). What I determined is that, even if the vaccine was 100% effective, is has a negative benefit for every age group and the younger you are, the worse it was.

24. For example, for very old people, we would kill approximately 2 people from all-cause mortality causes to save 1 person from dying from COVID. For 20-year-olds, the number was more than 6 people killed by the vaccine for every 1 person saved. At the time I did the calculation, data for younger people wasn’t available (since they hadn’t been vaccinated yet), but the trend was extremely clear: the younger you are, the more nonsensical vaccination was.

25. The detailed calculations are set out in my article, Vaccine risk benefit by age, and the table by age is on page 11 :

Computing the final V:C ratio

So here is our final result in one table that shows that the vaccines don’t make sense for any age group. The V:C ratio should be .1 or lower to make sense.

Age range V C V:C

20-30 67 11 6.09

30-40 120 31 3.87

40-50 209 76 2.75

50-60 436 185 2.36

60-70 1029 450 2.29

70-80 2133 1133 1.88

80+ 6266 3458 20.81

26. Although my work has not been peer-reviewed or published in a medical journal, the results are consistent with two papers published in peer-reviewed medical journals showing the same results: the vaccines kill more people than they save, they don’t make sense for any age group, and the younger you are, the more pronounced the harm (Kostoff and Walach papers previously mentioned).

DISPROVING THE RESULTS

27. I have over 100,000 followers on social media (Twitter, Gab, and Substack) and my analyses have attracted worldwide attention. Despite this, to date, there is not an alternative estimate that I am aware of that is more credible than what I have developed. If there was, I would have adopted it. I am more interested in truthful information being spread than being right. I am happy to be proven wrong.

28. I also publicly offered a $1M reward to any researcher who could find an error in one of the 8 methods I used to determine the 150,000 deaths caused by the vaccine that would significantly change the results. No one has come forward showing an error.

IMPACT OF FINDINGS

29. The most important conclusion from my work establishing that over 150,000 people have been killed by the COVID-19 vaccines means that the COVID-19 vaccines are more deadly than any vaccine in human history.

30. The normal “stopping condition” of a vaccine is around 50 deaths. For example, in 1976, we stopped the H1N1 vaccine after just 35 deaths (see https://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/30/ swine.flu.1976/index.html). These vaccines should have been stopped for all ages in January 2021. However, the FDA has not set a stopping condition for the vaccines.

31. I am friends with FDA acting commissioner Janet Woodcock and she refused to answer the stopping condition question.

32. I don’t know of anyone who knows what the stopping condition for the COVID-19 vaccines is. This is unheard of for a clinical trial. A clinical trial without a stopping condition would never be approved by the institutional review board (IRB). Before the COVID vaccines, this was unheard of.

33. The second most important conclusion from my work establishing that over 150,000 people have been killed by the COVID-19 vaccines is that, because the vaccine kills more people than it saves for every age group, it is nonsensical to vaccinate kids because you are much more likely to kill the child than to save his life.

34. A careful risk-benefit analysis for children 5 to 11 was done by Dr. Toby Rogers who found that we will kill an estimated 117 kids from the vaccine for every child we save from a COVID death. (See “What is the Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNTV) to prevent a single COVID-19 fatality in kids 5 to 11 based on the Pfizer EUA application?” published October 31, 2021. I have read his analysis and are not aware of any flaws. He used the best data from all sources for all of the values. (Ibid.) I believe it would be hard for anyone to dispute it. Over 20,000 people have viewed his analysis and there has been only praise in the comments that were posted. That is the ultimate peer review.

REFUSAL OF MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITIES TO ACCEPT RESULTS

35. Early treatments are extremely effective against COVID. Nobody has to lose their life from COVID if they are treated early. Uttar Pradesh in India uses early treatments, not vaccination. Their COVID death rate is now nearly zero. Uttar Pradesh’s population is 204 million, which is just 1/3 smaller than the United States’ population of 329M. Here is the most current data from Johns Hopkins University :

36. There are people inside the CDC that know all of this is happening, but they are told that if they speak out, they will be fired. I know this because I have spoken to a trusted source who explained to me that that is how he knew to avoid taking the COVID vaccines in January.

37. I have made multiple offers to the CDC and FDA to discuss my findings, but they refuse to have a meeting to discuss any of the results from the team of 29 experts that I collaborate with.

38. I attempted to get the attention of the members of the outside committees of the FDA and CDC by offering any of these members $1M just to have a recorded, on-the-record discussion of my results for a few hours. If I was wrong, they could correct our errors – this would significantly reduce vaccine hesitancy – no member was interested in my offer.

THE VACCINES DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD: RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSI WEIGHS

AGAINST VACCINATING CHILDREN

39. No one in the world can produce any evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines reduce all-cause mortality (death) or morbidity (disability). In fact, all the evidence I am aware of shows the reverse.

40. In US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity,” published August 25, 2021, the peer-reviewed medical article points out the statistically significant rise in all-cause morbidity for all vaccines.

41. The CDC examined the cause(s) of death of 14 children who died shortly after vaccination and were reported in the VAERS. In all cases, the causes of death were consistent with the causes of death elevated by the COVID vaccine, including pulmonary embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, suicide, and cardiac arrest. The causes of deaths of these children were not consistent with “natural causes” of death. Despite this, the CDC stated the cause of death with absolutely no commentary whatsoever regarding possible vaccine injury, and changed the topic. (Ibid.)

42. We would typically expect only 1.6 deaths in that age group to be reported in VAERS and we got 14, confirming my 12 “excess deaths” conclusion. The 1.6 was derived using VAERS queries over the period from 2015 to 2019 looking at deaths in that age range.

43. The VAERS database is approximately 41 times under-reported according to the CDC’s own methodology, so the 12 excess deaths actually represent 492 child deaths that were excess and caused by the vaccine.

44. The vaccines also are linked to prion diseases, a family of rare progressive neurodegenerative disorders that affect both humans and animals, that are distinguished by long incubation periods, neuronal loss, and a failure to induce inflammatory response. Once prion disease starts in the brain, it is not treatable and always leads to death. 100% of the time. No exceptions.

45. Finally, these vaccines are based on the original “wild type” virus. It is unknown how effective these vaccines will be against the new Omicron or any other variant, especially in kids where we do not even have data regarding vaccine efficacy from the original vaccines.

46. Based upon my analysis, research, and understanding of the data described in greater detail herein, above, mandating a vaccine for kids for an unknown risk that kills 117 kids within 6 weeks of vaccination, and/or causes brain damages in order to save 1 COVID life is nonsensical, unethical, and immoral. If these vaccine mandates are not halted immediately, kids will unnecessarily lose their lives. That is irreparable harm.

47. Since we couldn’t cost-benefit justify vaccination with the current variants, it will be even harder to conduct with respect to the newest variants, which appear to be very different from the original wild-type variant. Furthermore, Omicron is rapidly spreading and yet very mild, making vaccination even more unnecessary.

CONCLUSION

48. There are clear, significant dangers and a dubious benefit to vaccines, generally but especially now due to Omicron, and especially of children. COVID-19 vaccination clearly is killing people, and administering a vaccine designed for the “wild type” variant against what will soon be a pandemic of Omicron without clear scientific proof in double blind randomized trials of a positive all-cause mortality benefit is unethical. It is experimenting on our kids.

49. The failure to disclose the risks of adverse events (including death) violates California Health and Safety Codes, Federal laws against human experimentation and relating to emergency use authorizations, and the Nuremberg Code, among other things.

50. The mandated vaccination of our children is reprehensible and should be halted immediately.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on this 1st day of December, 2021.

______________________________

STEVEN T. KIRSCH

What Happens When Biden's Vax Mandates Fail? Lawyers Win Big $

We predict that the failure of the Biden vax mandates will eventually lead to huge legal liability for companies and academic institutions- illegal termination, vaccine damages, etc. This will also be a major financial windfall for independent lawyers.

Why independent lawyers, you ask? Because the large firms are all getting bought out by Pharma contracting for legal work and triggering "conflict of interest" clauses that block them from taking these cases.

What does this have to do with Biden's mandates? Because if they fail in the courts, then the legal top cover for the academic institutions, hospitals, and businesses vanish. The government and Pharma are indemnified. So then the organizations become the bagholders for liability.

This thesis applies more generally to most public policies: the larger public and private institutions are left holding the bag. The upcoming financial crisis will again confirm that.

Most large law firms can't take our cases now because they feared their other clients would leave. The one we hired is an independent spitfire and I’m glad we found him.

It is kind of like when high profile people speak to many divorce lawyers before an impending divorce to reduce their spouse from attaining certain councils.

I predict that the failure of the Biden vax mandates will eventually lead to huge legal liability for companies and academic institutions- illegal termination, vaccine damages, etc. This will also be a major financial windfall for independent lawyers.
— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) November 13, 2021

"It Raises Serious Constitutional Concerns" - Appeals Court Re-Affirms Stay On Biden Vaccine Mandate

One wouldn't know it by scanning the front pages of say WaPo, NYT or Bloomberg where it wasn't even mentioned, but late on Friday a bad week, month, and year for the scrambling Biden administration - which in addition to the recent disaster in Virginia where a public referendum on "wokeness" saw the public overwhelmingly vote down the Democrats' attempt to subvert social norms, is also facing the worst inflationary inferno since Nixon ended the gold standard - after a U.S. appeals court upheld its decision to put on hold Joe Biden's unconstitutional order for companies with 100 workers or more to demand COVID-19 vaccines, rejecting a challenge by his administration.

A three-member panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans affirmed its ruling despite the Biden administration's position that halting implementation of the vaccine mandate could lead to dozens or even hundreds of deaths. No Nov 6, the Fifth Circuit granted a temporary stay on enforcement of the federal mandate, one day after the rule was announced. In its reaffirmation Friday, the court said the mandate "exposes [petitioners] to severe financial risk" and "threatens to decimate their workforces (and business prospects)."

"The mandate is staggeringly overbroad," the opinion said adding that the vaccine mandate "raises serious constitutional concerns" and "likely exceeds the federal government’s authority."

"The mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers)," Circuit Court Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote for the panel.

5th Circuit affirms OSHA stay applies nationwide. @POTUS can’t mandate vaccines on private companies. #lagov #lalege
— AG Jeff Landry (@AGJeffLandry) November 13, 2021

In its ruling, the Fifth Circuit judges agreed with opponents of vaccine mandates, which have become a deeply controversial topic in the United States (as if the country needed any more of those) - supporters say they are a must to put an end to the nearly two-year coronavirus pandemic, while opponents argue they violate the Constitution and curb individual liberty.

"The public interest is also served by maintaining our constitutional structure and maintaining the liberty of individuals to make intensely personal decisions according to their own convictions - even, or perhaps particularly, when those decisions frustrate government officials," Engelhardt wrote.

At Biden’s orders, the OSHA issued a rule earlier this month requiring U.S. employers with 100 or more workers to ensure their workers are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or undergoing weekly tests for the virus by Jan 4. Businesses that don’t comply face thousands of dollars in fines.

The rule prompted a slate of legal challenges from at least 27 states as well as business and religious groups who argue the mandate is unconstitutional. Biden and other federal officials argue the mandate is necessary to end the COVID-19 pandemic and fully reopen the economy.

White House officials had no immediate comment on the ruling, which was hailed as a victory by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Texas joined other U.S. states, as well as private employers and religious organizations, in legal challenges to the order.

"Citing Texas's "compelling argument[s]," the 5th Circuit has delayed OSHA's unconstitutional and illegal private-business vaccine mandate. WE WON! Litigation will continue, but this is a massive victory for Texas and for FREEDOM from Biden's tyranny and lawlessness," Paxton wrote.

🚨Citing Texas’s “compelling argument[s],” 5th Circuit has stayed OSHA’s unconstitutional & illegal private-business vaccine mandate. WE WON! Litigation will continue, but this is a massive victory for Texas & FREEDOM from Biden’s tyranny & lawlessness.https://t.co/w7MKyXs73L
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) November 13, 2021

Only 7 Countries in Western World Require Kids Masks in Schools

which countries require no masks for kids in school

The U.S. is one of the few countries still recommending masks in schools as most nations let kids attend classes without face coverings.

Although states are allowed to set their own rules, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests universal indoor masking for all students above age two regardless of vaccination status.

In fact, 68.2 percent of the 500 of the largest school districts in America still require masks, according to data analytics firm Burbio.

However, at least 14 countries, including the UK, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Australia, don’t require kids to wear face coverings

Aside from the U.S., DailyMail.com could only identify six other Western countries where masking is broadly required or recommended in schools: Canada, France, Italy, Portugal, Romania and Spain.

In Canada, America’s closest neighbor, provinces get to set their own rules just like states do in the U.S., with most instituting mask mandates.

Of the 10 provinces, two require masks for all K-12 students, one requires for grades 1-12, two require for grades 4-12 and three require masking across all students.

The remaining two provinces, Quebec and Newfoundland & Labrador, only don’t require masks if case rates in the surrounding areas are low.

In France, mandatory face masks had been lifted by the requirement is being reimposed for all elementary school students as of November 15 due to rising case rates.

Meanwhile, in Italy, Portugal, Spain and Romania, millions of children started of the school year wearing masks.

Recent studies have found that children are just as likely as adults to test positive for Covid, but about half are asymptomatic compared to 10 percent of over-18s.

The risk of being hospitalized and death is much smaller with less than 0.1 percent of kids falling severely ill or dying of Covid.

And because of this low risk, most Western nations have opted to ditch the masks and have kids return to ‘normalcy’ in classrooms.

In the UK, for example, millions of children returned to schools in early September with face coverings not required.

And while masks are a politically divisive issue in the U.S., members of both the Conservative and Labour Parties in the UK have stated that wearing masks prevent children from being able to communicate and socialize.

In Norway, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health advises against school-aged children wearing masks. Pictured: Third grade pupils at Nordstrand Steinerskole school in Oslo, Norway, April 2020

A recent DailyMail.com analysis found that kids in the U.S. are being hospitalized at a rate up to four times higher than kids in the UK.

In Scandinavian countries – Denmark, Norway and Sweden – almost all COVID-19 restrictions have been lifted, including mask mandates.

In fact, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health advises against school-aged children wearing masks.

In Irelands, kids under age 13 are not required to wear masks and in Iceland and the Netherlands, middle and high school students are only required to do so when not seated in classrooms.

So why are Europeans less likely to mandate masks in schools? There are a few reasons.

Firstly, many European populations are more vaccinated than several U.S. states.

For example, West Virginia and Idaho have yet to vaccinate 50 percent of their populations compared to more than 70 percent in all Nordic countries, according to data from the U.S. CDC and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.

Secondly, trust in authority figures is higher in the European Union than in the U.S.

‘Because of this, parents and the policymakers representing them may feel less need to protect children from each other with masks,’ writes Anthony La Mesa in Medium.

Another reason could be that more testing occurs in Europe than in the U.S.

Currently the UK’s Department of Education requires all secondary school students, between ages 11 and 18, be tested at home twice a week using tests.

Additionally, Norway is mass testing students to phase out quarantining students amid Covid outbreaks.

Because there is no regular testing at many U.S. schools, kids are being sent to classrooms instead of being kept at home because tests aren’t detecting these cases.

This can lead to these children being hospitalized themselves or infecting other children who end up hospitalized.

No Vax Resources: (Job Boards, Exemption Letters, Legal)

Disclaimer: we have no experience with these companies - pls do your homework.

To better guide your search for information on all things related to Covid-19, a list of resources has been compiled below for each of the following categories: Medical, Legal, Forms & Letters, Jobs, Alternative Resources, and Critical Information on the Bigger Agenda. I will be adding additional resources, and possibly categories, as time goes on – so be sure to bookmark this page.

Medical Resources

Doctor Consultations, Medications & Protocols

Physician List & Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment – AAPS
How Do I Get COVID-19 Medication? – America’s Frontline Doctors
Reducing Risk of COVID-19 Infection and Severity – C19 Protocols
How to Get Ivermectin – FLCCC
Doctor Consults in All 50 States – My Free Doctor
Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center, Ohio
The Zelenko Protocol – Dr. Zelenko MD
Protocols for post mRNA shot – Dr. Joe Nieusma

Medical Information

Information on Covid-19 Treatments, Medicines, and Mandates – AAPS
Informative Videos by America’s Frontline Doctors
Exclusive Ongoing Updates: Covid-19 Vaccine Concerns – Sharyl Attkisson
COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization Fact Sheets – CDC
Medical Ethics, Patient Safety and Human Rights in Response to Covid-19 – Doctors for Covid Ethics
Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities – FDA
Information on Ivermectin and Covid-19 – FLCCC
Information on Covid-19 Tests and Vaccines – ICAN
A Doctor and a Voice of Reason About Vaccines and Current Events – Dr. Tenpenny
Informative Videos and News on Covid-19 and Vaccines by The Highwire

Medical Research Databases

Peer Reviewed Published Articles Science Library – Children’s Health Defense
Preliminary Reports Not Yet Peer Reviewed – MedRxiv
Biomedical Literature Library – PubMed
WHO Global Database of Reported Potential Side Effects – VigiAccess

Adverse Event Reporting Databases

Report a Covid-19 Vaccine Injury – ICAN
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System – VAERS – CDC
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System – VAERS – HHS
The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System – VAERS – MedAlerts
“Red Boxes” Summary Page of VAERS data
COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Reactions Reports – UK
COVID-19 Yellow Card Reporting Site – UK

Legal Resources

Legal Advice

Get Legal Help Related to Covid-19 Mandates and Vaccines – America’s Frontline Doctors
Fighting Mandatory Vaccines – COVID Legal USA
Legal Help for Religious Exemptions from Vaccinations – Liberty Counsel
How to Get a Religious Exemption for Employer or College – The Healthy American
Law Firms and List of Lawyers by State – Fight The Mandates
Know Your Rights – Thomas More Society

Legal Actions

Covid-19 Related Lawsuits and Legal Matters Archives – AAPS
Be A Part of a Broader Suit Related to Covid-19 Vaccines – America’s Frontline Doctors
Email Congress Members Regarding a Vaccine Bill of Rights – America’s Frontline Doctors
Medical Freedom Related Lawsuits – Children’s Health Defense
Education, Advocacy and Legal Challenges to Unjust Mandates – Health Freedom Defense Fund
Legal Actions Taken Regarding Covid-19 – ICAN
Covid-19 Vaccine Legal Resources and Research – Liberty Counsel
Medical Freedom Fight – Renz Law

As of September 9, 2021, these states are fighting against mandates of the Covid jab and / or vaccine ID passports.

Legal Information

How to Obtain Religious Exemption – America’s Frontline Doctors
Legal Resources – Children’s Health Defense
Resources About Legal Rights and Information on Cases – Children’s Health Defense
Mandates Toolbox – Children’s Health Defense
The PREP Act and COVID-19: Limiting Liability for Medical Countermeasures – Congressional Research Service
The FDA Bait-and-Switch on Pfizer Covid-19 Jab – Corey’s Digs
Authorization for Medical Products for Use in Emergencies – Cornell Law School
Covered Vaccines – HRSA
What laws exist to protect employees and adults from vaccine mandates? – National Vaccine Information Center
Employee Rights – The Healthy American
Get Your State Laws – The Healthy American

Forms & Letters

Employees

Exemption Forms, Letters and Information for Employees – Children’s Health Defense
Form for Employees Whose Employers Are Requiring Covid-19 Injections – Corey’s Digs
Supporting Documentation for Vaccine Exemption – Gab
Legal Memo on COVID Vaccination Mandates – Liberty Counsel
Employer Letter Example Religious Exemption – No Vax Mandate

Financial Planning

Family Financial Disclosure Form for COVID-19 Injections – Solari Report

Firefighters

AFLDS Firefighter Form – America’s Frontline Doctors

Hospital Workers

Exemption form Hospital Vaccine Mandate – AAPS

Military

Vaccine Exemption Sample Letter for Military – Gab

Notices for Covid-19 Test Mandates

Notice for Employers, Universities and Other Institutions Mandating Covid-19 Tests – Children’s Health Defense
Notice for Employers Regarding Covid-19 Testing – Health Freedom Defense

Notices for Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates

Notice of Liability to Schools Regarding Vaccine Mandates – America’s Frontline Doctors
Notice for Employers, Universities and Other Institutions Mandating Covid-19 Vaccines – Children’s Health Defense

Notices for Vaccine Administrators

Notice of Potential Liability to Vaccinator – America’s Frontline Doctors

Other Forms

Other Forms Related to the Covid-19 Vaccine – America’s Frontline Doctors

Parents

Notice of Parental Authority Requirement of Disclosure & Safety of Medical Treatments – Solari Report

Religious Exemption Letters and Documentation

Religious Exemption for Covid-19 Vaccine Documents – Gab
Religious Exemption Supporting Documentation – Gab
How to Get a Religious Exemption for Employer or College – The Healthy American

Students

Letter to Academic Institutions Regarding Vaccine Mandates – America’s Frontline Doctors
Open Letter from Physicians to Universities Regarding Vaccine Mandates – AAPS
Exemption Forms, Letters and Information for Students – Children’s Health Defense
Exemption Forms, Letters and Information for K-12 Students – Children’s Health Defense
Form for Students Attending Colleges or Universities Requiring Covid-19 Injections – Corey’s Digs
Religious Exemption Template For College Students – Gab
Sample Forms for Notices to Schools – Take Action Canada

United Airlines Employees

United Airlines Employee Form – America’s Frontline Doctors

Vaccine ID Card

The FBI doesn’t want you to use these Vax ID Card templates – Montana Daily Gazette

Natural Immunity Studies

List of 80+ List of Studies Showing Natural Immunity ‘Equal’ or ‘Superior’ to Jab

Job Boards

No Vax Mandate Job Board – Gab
No Vax Jobs USA – No Vax Jobs USA
No Vax Mandate Job Listings – No Vax Mandate
Employers & Employees Who Value Freedom – Red Balloon
Do Not Require Vax – Freedom Job Network
No Vax Mandate Job Listings – Jobs Not Jabs

NEW Category: Alternative Resources

This category will host links to resources that assist with our freedom of movement and activity, that do not restrict us with mandates.

• Private charter air travel – Freedom Travel Alliance
• Shopping and supplies that may be difficult to find locally, and don’t require a mask – Solutions by Corey’s Digs

Critical Information on the Bigger Agenda

Corey’s Digs 5-Part Covid Report

COVID-19 Pt. 1: Hospitalizations – Reality Check
COVID-19 Pt. 2: New “PIC” and The Hidden Data
COVID-19 Pt. 3: Nursing Homes and Long Term Care Facility Deaths “With” OR “From” Covid Facts
COVID-19 Pt. 4: The “Test” That Changed The world is Deeply Flawed
COVID-19 Pt. 5: Psychologists, Scientists and The CIA Tell Us Fear is The Real Killer

Corey’s Digs 4-Part Digital Identity Report

The Global Landscape on Vaccine ID Passports Part 1
The Global Landscape on Vaccine ID Passports Part 2: How Your Digital Identity is Moving to the Blockchain for Full Control Over Humans
The Global Landscape on Vaccine ID Passports Part 3: The Key Implementers of Your Digital Identity onto The Blockchain
The Global Landscape on Vaccine ID Passports Part 4: BLOCKCHAINED

Corey’s Digs report ‘CDC Bases Covid Jab Death Toll % on Doses – Not People, as Death Toll Topples all Other “Vaccines” for 3 Decades‘

Other Resources for Critical Information