Showing posts with label Fake News. Show all posts

10 Reasons Why Sen. Rand Paul Is Right About The COVID Lab Leak Theory

The Dangers of Fake Science in Vaccine Testing: A Critical Examination

In the battle against infectious diseases, vaccines stand as one of humanity's greatest achievements. They have saved countless lives and eradicated or brought under control devastating illnesses. However, amid the triumphs of science, there lurks a shadowy counterpart – fake science. The proliferation of misinformation, pseudoscience, and fraudulent research not only undermines public trust but also poses significant risks, particularly in the crucial realm of vaccine testing.

Why Do Liberals Support Censorship?

Nanoscientist & Harvard Professor Charles Lieber Charged Federally For Ties To China

I miss Covid. Booster just sounds better. I am introducing a daily COVID shot.

Google says our site is "Unreliable and has harmful claims and must fix". This is an example of big tech censorship that has gone wrong. Google is never specific about what it feels is harmful. It makes broad generalizations about their claims with no specifics.

17,000 Physicians and Medical Scientists Address Crimes Against Humanity

The time is now. As most readers of this substack are now well aware, this is not just about COVID. The Constitution hangs in the balance. Please help us to get these messages spread far and wide. The 17,000 Physicians and Medical Scientists in our organization, who are not financially conflicted and remain committed to the Hippocratic Oath, are doing our part. Now we ask that you help us to help you. We need your help.

Jordan Trishton Walker - Pfizer Director of R&D - Strategy Operations & mRNA Scientific Planning

Pfizer Exposed For Exploring "Mutating" COVID-19 Virus For New Vaccines Via 'Directed Evolution'

Mainstream media will cause the fall of our democracy.

We must fight it. #CancelMainstreamMedia
— Elon Musk (Parody) (@ElonMuskAOC) June 10, 2023

A healthy democracy requires an informed and engaged citizenry, diverse media sources, responsible journalism, and critical thinking skills.

Sign Petition FDA Needs To Investigate Pfizer's Clinical Trial Fraud Allegations

Should the FDA investigate Pfizer's clinical trial fraud allegations? Or look the other way?

Raps Songs About Getting Vaccinated - Hilarious

Follow https://twitter.com/alexstein99

With such little time left, can’t we all just get along!?!? pic.twitter.com/Qz3d1Og5vx
— Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅 (@DanScavino) March 8, 2022

List of COVID Disinformation Spreaders That Need To Be Investigated

Steve Kirsch believe that all of these people are involved in “The proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions” and have collectively led to the tragic death of over 1M Americans.

John Durham is working on largest criminal conspiracy in US history

Devin Nunes Lee Smith Kash Patel on Truth Social.

Is This Who Is Behind The Joe Rogan Attack?

@patriottakes works with @MeidasTouch and I'd say it's a safe bet that given their expertise in social media management that the n-word video was created by Meidastouch. BUT WE ARE NOT DONE. MeidasTouch is a Super PAC. Well, what's a super PAC you ask?

A Super PAC is political advocacy group with a special twist: "super PACs may raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions, associations and individuals, then spend unlimited sums to overtly advocate for or against political candidates." (http://opensecrets.org).

Was Mass Vaccinating in the Public’s Interest or Pfizer’s?

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Reports $37B COVID Vaccine Sales in 2021

Pfizer reported global sales and alliance revenue from its abortion-tainted COVID vaccine brought in $36.78 billion in 2021, helping to more than double profits across its business operations compared with 2020.

In an earnings report issued Tuesday, the pharmaceutical giant also estimated that sales of its vaccine and anti-viral pill will top $54 billion in 2022, buoying shareholders’ hopes that profits at the company might soar for the second year in a row.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said the company plans to aggressively expand the use of messenger RNA beyond just COVID vaccines, pointing to potential treatments of muscle, the liver and nervous system, despite warnings from many researchers that the use of mRNA technology carries significant risks.

Despite record earnings, Pfizer shares fell 3% yesterday on Wall Street due to lower than expected 2022 sales forecasts for its anti-viral pill, Paxlovid, which it sells at $530 a course in the United States.

Anti-viral pills like ivermectin, which health chiefs have sought to ban or restrict, typically sell for a few dollars when available, with several scientists suggesting the much-maligned pills are more effective than those produced by Pfizer.

Pfizer said its overall sales in 2022 across the company’s product range could reach $102 billion.

“In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, we committed to use all of the resources and expertise we had at our disposal to help protect populations globally against this deadly virus, as well as to offer treatments to help avoid the worst outcomes when infections do occur,” Bourla said yesterday. “We put billions of dollars of capital on the line in pursuit of those goals, not knowing whether those investments would ever pay off.”

Reacting to the earnings on Twitter, some commentators remarked on how beneficial mass-vaccination programs had been to the company’s balance sheet.

Bourla also said yesterday that Pfizer’s vaccine for the Omicron variant would not be ready for distribution until March, casting further doubt on calls from health officials and mainstream media outlets to vaccinate people now with shots made for previous variants.

Was mass vaccinating in the public’s interest or Pfizer’s? https://t.co/ojPAhfiCNE
— Lisa Boothe (@LisaMarieBoothe) February 8, 2022

The CEO acknowledged that the eradication of COVID is unlikely to be achieved because of mutations and the virus’ global spread, with some scientists previously warning that new vaccines were contributing to the growth of variants.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer vice president and chief scientist for respiratory research, last week called on the media to apologize for their “lies” about vaccine safety as leaked data from the U.S. military indicated a 300% increase in miscarriages in 2021.

Yeadon, who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with the most senior research position in his field, was an author of a submitted petition to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in December 2020 that raised substantial concerns regarding a lack of sufficient testing of the experimental COVID-19 gene-based vaccines before their emergency use authorizations.

With regard to the possibility of the shots endangering the fertility of women, Yeadon and his colleague, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, wrote, “There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case, this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”

Such a possibility would need to be ruled out through standard experimentation before imposing such substances onto the entire population, according to the doctors.

“It’s important to note that none of these gene-based agents had completed what’s called ‘reproductive toxicology,’” Yeadon wrote in his recent statement. “Over a year later, this battery of tests in animals still has not been done. So there was and still is no data package supporting safety in pregnancy or prior to conception.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released data in December showing a total of 965,843 reports of adverse events after COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 10, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The data included a total of 20,244 reports of deaths and 155,506 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same period.

Doctor Angelique Coetzee Who Discovered Omicron Was Pressured Not To Reveal It's Mild

When asked if it's true, Coetzee replied: "I was told not to state publicly that it was a mild illness. I have been asked to refrain from making such statements and to say that it is a serious illness. I declined." (translated).

"What does that mean?" replied Welt.

"I am a clinician and based on the clinical picture there are no indications that we are dealing with a very serious disease. The course is mostly mild. I'm not saying you won't get sick if you're mild.

"The definition of mild Covid-19 disease is clear, and it is a WHO definition: patients can be treated at home and oxygen or hospitalization is not required," she said, adding: "A serious illness is one in which we see acute pulmonary respiratory infections: people need oxygen, maybe even artificial respiration. We saw that with Delta - but not with Omikron. So I said to people, "I can't say it like that because it's not what we're seeing.""

When asked why she was prevented from telling the truth, Coetzee said "They tried, but they didn't make it."

"What I said at one point – because I was just tired of it – was: In South Africa this is a mild illness, but in Europe it is a very serious one. That's what your politicians wanted to hear."

According to Coetzee, she wasn't pressured by South African authorities - and was instead criticized by scientists in the UK and Netherlands, who said "How can you explain that it's a mild disease? It's a serious illness. Look at the mutations."

My reports have thrown them off track. In a pandemic, you also have to look at what is happening at the grassroots level. The general practitioners who treat the sick every day must be asked what they experience, how the clinical picture presents itself. -Welt

When Omicron first emerged, Dr. Anthony Fauci played dumb right after praising South African doctors, saying: "The things that we don’t know right now are whether the people who do get infected have a severer form of the disease or whether it’s a light disease or somewhat the same as delta."

Ivermectin Adoption By Country Wordwide Map

Strictly regular use of ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19 leads to a 90% reduction in COVID-19 mortality rate, in a dose-response manner: definitive results of a prospective observational study of a strictly controlled 223,128 population from a city-wide program in Southern Brazil

Ivermectin is currently used for about 28% of the world’s population. Countries where COVID-19 mortality is close to zero may not have incentive to adopt treatments. When excluding these countries, ivermectin adoption is about 39%. We excluded countries where the cumulative mortality over the preceding month was less than 1 in 1 million.

Western authorities are presenting our choices as either catch covid eventually (because it is so infectious and now spreading everywhere) or take vaccines every three months (according to the latest guidelines), apparently for the indefinite future. They hide and vigorously “omit” the third alternative: the anti-viral path.

Covid, vaccines, or anti-viral. Which is doing better?

Let’s do a scorecard, of official covid deaths per million population [and current daily cases, total, not per capita] on 26 Dec 2021:

Countries that did not close their borders and went to vaccines as soon as possible:

USA – 2,509 [250k]

UK – 2,161 [120k]

Germany – 1,319 [40k]

France – 1,871 [100k]

Canada – 788 [20k]

Italy – 2,265 [50k]

Russia – 2,077 [25k]

Countries that did not close their borders and, after alarming infection, mostly adopted ivermectin:

India – 342 [8k]

Indonesia – 519 [< 1k]

Japan – 146 [< 1k]

Egypt – 205 [< 1k]

Peru – 6,016 (the country hit hardest, until they used ivermectin) [6k]

Columbia – 2,510 [ 3k]

Venezuela – 188 [< 1k]

Nigeria – 14 [4k]

South Africa – 1,502 [20k]

Countries that closed their borders but have recently opened up:

Australia – 84 [10k]

Western Australia – 0.5 [2 cases yesterday, 7 in last few months]

New Zealand – 10 [70]

Vietnam – 314 [16k]

Taiwan – 36 [14] (borders still closed)

Different policies, different health outcomes. Even a bureaucrat could work it out, eventually.

Meanwhile, Pfizer must be very pleased with themselves — producing the most widely used treatment in history!

Vaccines in the west are too big politically to fail — yet they are. There is only so much you can cover up with propaganda and voodoo statistics.

UPDATE: Ivermectin works as well as vaccines, but does not wane and is without the harmful side effects.

The Study:

Background: Previously, we demonstrated that ivermectin use as prophylaxis for COVID-19 was associated with reductions in COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates, and in the risk of dying from COVID-19, irrespective of regularity and accumulated use of ivermectin, in an observational, prospectively obtained data from a strictly controlled city-wide program in a city in Southern Brazil (Itajaí, SC, Brazil) of of medically-based, optional use of ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19.

In this study, our objective was to explore the data obtained from the program to evaluate whether the level of regularity of ivermectin use impacted in the reductions in these outcomes, aiming to determine if ivermectin showed a progressive dose-, regularity-response in terms of protection from COVID-19 and COVID-19 related outcomes.

Materials and methods: This is a prospective observational study of the program mention above, that used ivermectin at a dose of 0.2mg/kg/day for two consecutive days, every 15 days. We obtained and analyzed the data regarding the accumulated dose of ivermectin use, in addition to age and comorbidities, to analyze the patterns of reduction of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates, and risk of dying from COVID-19, according to the regularity and amount of ivermectin used in a 5-month period.

Following definitions of regularity, we considered as strictly regular subjects that used at least 180mg of ivermectin (180mg = 30 tablets), and as sporadic users subjects that used 60mg (= 10 tablets) or less during the 5-month period.

Comparisons between subjects that did not use ivermectin and these two levels of regularity of ivermectin use were performed. Analysis of the intermediate levels of ivermectin use are present in the supplement appendix of this study. To analyze hospitalization and mortality rates, we utilized the database of COVID-19 infections of all participants, from Itajaí and outside. To analyze COVID-19 infection rate and risk of dying from COVID-19 we utilized the Itajaí city database.

Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed, followed by multivariate adjusted analysis for residual differences (doubly adjusted analysis).

Results:

Of the 7,345 cases of COVID-19, 3,034 occurred in non-users, 1,627 in sporadic users, and 289 in strict users, while the remaining cases occurred in the intermediate levels of ivermectin use. Strict users were older (p < 0.0001) and non-significant higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

COVID-19 infection rate was 39% lower among strict users [4.03% infection rate; ( p < 0.0001] than in non-users (6.64% infection rate), and non-significant 11% reduction compared to sporadic users (4.54% infection rate) (n = 1,627 in each group; RR, 0.89; 95%CI 0.76 – 1.03; p = 0.11).

Hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in strict users, compared to non-users and to sporadic users, both before and after Propensity score matching ( p < 0.0001).

After Propensity score matching, hospitalization rate was 35% lower among sporadic users than non-users (RR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.44 – 0.70; p = 0.03).

In propensity score matched groups, multivariate-adjusted mortality rate was 90% lower in strict users compared to non-users (p = 0.003) and 79% lower than in sporadic users (p = 0.05), while sporadic users had a 37% reduction in mortality rate compared to non-users (p = 0.043).

Risk of dying from COVID-19 was 86% lower among strict users than non-users (p = 0.006) and marginally significant, 72% lower than sporadic users (p = 0.083), while sporadic users had a 51% reduction compared to non-users (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 10-times increase in mortality risk and 7-times increased risk of dying from COVID-19, compared to strictly regular use of ivermectin in a prospectively collected, strictly controlled population.

A progressive dose-response pattern was observed between level of ivermectin use and level of protection from COVID-19 related outcomes and consistent across different levels of ivermectin use.

The results of this study clearly demonstrate that prophylactic use of ivermectin must be initiated immediately for people in high risk categories in the United States and worldwide. This includes individuals with one or more co-morbidities and the middle aged/elderly. Our “design-to-fail” government funded clinical trials for early treatment and governmental obstructionism regarding life saving treatments to patients must end now.

The CDC chart below for all deaths since the start of the outbreak clearly shows a jump in cases after 50 years old.

However, as the data for deaths per million per age group is not disclosed, so the age for start of prophylaxis has yet to be determined.

As Omicron has less pathogenicity and slightly different disease profile this too could influence what age prophylaxis treatment should begin. But the data are in, prophylactic use of ivermectin saves lives.

A doctor's decision to inform the patient of the 'off-label' status of the prescription is not relevant to the physician's standard of care for an informed consent case.

The FDA has specifically stated that its procedures and requirements have no effect on the practice of medicine and that the FDA does not prohibit doctors from prescribing drugs in an 'off-label' manner.

The FDA's approval of a drug is immaterial to the effectiveness in the drug's 'off-label' use. In fact, prescribing medication in an 'off-label' manner can constitute the standard of care in many cases.

A doctor's duty is to practice medicine and treat his patient, not inform the patient of the FDA's non-medically related labeling. Therefore, doctors should not be branded with the additional duty of disclosing non-pertinent information, such as the FDA's medically irrelevant distinction, to their patients

*It is estimated that 21% of all prescription drugs are prescribed “off-label.”

For fun, I took the countries that reportedly use Ivermectin country-wide and compared them to the USA, Israel and Sweden. I chose a three month cut-off, although the results were extended further. I did this because I don’t know when some of the countries began ivermectin use.

Can you guess who now has the highest death rates per million? Yeh -

USA

Israel

Sweden

Notes: I included - India, because although not all regions use Ivermectin - although the most populated due. Likewise Africa - which many nations treat with ivermectin prophylactically and these world maps do not break down Africa by Nations (weirdly imperialistic). I did not include Bulgaria, as although they use ivermectin - their death rate numbers are skewed for other reasons not worth delving into.

There are a lot of confounding variables here. Such as natural immunity, vaccination rates of the elderly and those with co-morbidities, as well as seasonality of the virus, vitamin D3/zinc levels and age of population.

But it is still an interesting snap shot as to where much of the world is right now.

Millions of People Are Leaving Facebook For Alternatives

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg saw $29 billion wiped from his net worth when his company’s share price collapsed following its latest quarterly report.

DWAC is about to take a large share of these Facebook users leaving.

What is DWAC? A company that is fighting the fake news and social media censorship is launching a new social media network called Truthsocial.com

Shares of Meta dropped more than 25% in after-hours trading after the company announced lower-than-expected revenue figures, as well as a decline in Facebook users for the first time in its 18-year history.

The number of daily active Facebook users fell by 1 million to 1.929 billion, with the company blaming competition from rivals like TikTok and YouTube.

The poor performance saw the company’s stock market value fall by roughly $200 billion, leading to a drop in Zuckerberg’s fortune, which is mostly tied up in Meta stock. Zuckerberg is ranked as the world’s seventh richest person, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, with his net worth before the collapse estimated at $121 billion.

This Gov’t Is the Virus, Media Is How It Spreads, Behavior Is the Pandemic, Common Sense is the Cure

The Government is the virus

The Government is the virus, the media is how it spreads, people's behavior is how it spreads, and common sense is the cure.

10 Reasons Why Sen. Rand Paul Is Right About The COVID Lab Leak Theory

The Dangers of Fake Science in Vaccine Testing: A Critical Examination