Showing posts with label Fraud. Show all posts

Are Health Insurance Companies Purposely Trying to Cancel Insurance for Grandfathered Plans by Failing to Charge Automatic Payments?

In recent years, concerns have surfaced about whether health insurance companies are intentionally making it difficult for people to keep their grandfathered plans. Specifically, some policyholders have reported that their automatic payments are not being processed, which could lead to the cancellation of their coverage. This article delves into these concerns and explores whether insurance companies might be purposely creating obstacles for people with older, grandfathered insurance plans.

What Are Grandfathered Health Insurance Plans?

Without skipping a beat, Musk turned his attention to what few billionaires would dare talk about—election fraud and voter IDs.

Without one single stutter, Musk declared, “The purpose of no voter ID is obviously to conduct fraud in elections.”

“The same people that demanded… pic.twitter.com/mGFXbOSXd7
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) October 8, 2024

The conversation around voter ID laws in elections is one that sparks heated debates, especially in the context of securing the democratic process versus ensuring accessible voting. In a recent statement, Elon Musk drew a parallel between two controversial issues: the requirement of vaccine IDs during the COVID-19 pandemic and the opposition to voter ID laws in elections. Musk highlighted the inconsistency of demanding vaccine proof for certain activities while simultaneously opposing voter identification, arguing that the lack of voter ID makes it “literally impossible” to prevent or detect large-scale fraud.

The Argument for Voter ID Laws

Musk’s comments reflect a common concern among proponents of voter ID laws, who argue that requiring identification at the polls is a necessary measure to ensure the integrity of elections. Their position is straightforward: just as IDs are required for various daily activities—such as boarding a plane, buying alcohol, or obtaining a driver’s license—voter identification should be a minimum requirement for participating in an election. The claim is that without voter IDs, elections become vulnerable to fraud, with the potential for individuals to vote under false identities or cast multiple ballots.

Supporters also believe that voter ID laws can increase public trust in the electoral system. In a climate where allegations of election fraud can undermine confidence in democratic institutions, implementing voter ID laws may serve as a safeguard to restore faith in election outcomes.

The Counter-Argument: Voter Suppression and Accessibility

On the other side of the debate, opponents of voter ID laws argue that such requirements disproportionately affect certain groups of people, particularly minorities, low-income individuals, and the elderly. Critics contend that millions of Americans lack the necessary documentation or face significant barriers in obtaining an ID. For these individuals, adding an ID requirement could disenfranchise them from exercising their right to vote, effectively suppressing their voices in the democratic process.

Furthermore, critics argue that voter fraud is extremely rare and that there is no substantial evidence to suggest that widespread fraud has occurred in past U.S. elections. The concern among those who oppose voter ID laws is that these policies are less about preventing fraud and more about creating obstacles for specific voter demographics, potentially skewing election outcomes in favor of certain political parties.

The Controversy of "No Voter ID Means Fraud"

Elon Musk’s assertion that “the purpose of no voter ID is obviously to conduct fraud” encapsulates the fear that without stricter identification measures, it is impossible to maintain the integrity of elections. However, this statement is contentious. While some believe that the absence of voter ID laws invites fraud, there is no consensus on this issue. Numerous studies and investigations have found minimal instances of voter impersonation, casting doubt on the necessity of voter ID laws as a fraud prevention measure.

Nevertheless, the debate persists, with advocates on both sides pointing to different studies, legal precedents, and political ideologies to support their arguments. For many, the core question is whether the risks of disenfranchising voters outweigh the potential for fraud prevention—or whether the two concerns can be balanced in a fair and effective way.

Conclusion

The debate over voter ID laws is not new, but it has taken on renewed urgency in light of recent political events and public figures like Elon Musk weighing in. At the heart of the issue is the tension between ensuring election security and protecting voter access. While proponents of voter ID laws see them as a necessary safeguard against fraud, opponents view them as a barrier that could disenfranchise millions of eligible voters.

Ultimately, the challenge lies in finding a solution that addresses concerns about election integrity while ensuring that every eligible voter can participate in the democratic process. As discussions on voter ID laws continue to evolve, it remains critical to consider both the risks and benefits of such policies in shaping the future of voting rights.

DOJ Announces Arrest of $5.9 Billion Covid Relief Botnet Scheme

In a significant breakthrough in the fight against cybercrime, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced the arrest of 35-year-old YunHe Wang, a Chinese national allegedly responsible for orchestrating a global malware network. This network, known as "911 S5," was purportedly used to steal $5.9 billion in Covid relief funds and was tied to other criminal activities, including child exploitation and bomb threats.

Data From the Election Lab at MIT

What Is PPP Loan Fraud?

17,000 Physicians and Medical Scientists Address Crimes Against Humanity

The time is now. As most readers of this substack are now well aware, this is not just about COVID. The Constitution hangs in the balance. Please help us to get these messages spread far and wide. The 17,000 Physicians and Medical Scientists in our organization, who are not financially conflicted and remain committed to the Hippocratic Oath, are doing our part. Now we ask that you help us to help you. We need your help.

Sign Petition FDA Needs To Investigate Pfizer's Clinical Trial Fraud Allegations

Should the FDA investigate Pfizer's clinical trial fraud allegations? Or look the other way?

Wall Street Is Finally Paying Attention to the ‘Trust the Science’ Fraud

Blackrock’s Edward Dowd reveals how Big Pharma is going to become the next potential financial crisis.

As Pfizer try to ‘pump their stock’ Hedge Fund guru Dowd, takes us inside what he calls the third great fraud in his lifetime, in this new bombshell interview with Dr Naomi Wolf.

Will CDC's Rochelle Walensky be found guilty of fraud? She is testifying before a grand jury.

If you found this video informative I would suggested watching this video of Edward Dowd. Pfizer, FDA Hid Failed Clinical Trials Data, Says BlackRock Advisor

ICYMI: Oregon Sen. Kim Thatcher, Dennis Linthicum and Dr Ealy have filed Grand Jury Petition in 9th Circuit Court against CDC, Rochelle Walensky et al.

Suit alleges Covid data fraud, conspiracy, malfeasance, misappropriation of taxpayer $ and more. 👇🏻https://t.co/ChWNYC1fyt
— rosecity_outrage (@rosecityoutrage) March 27, 2022

Pfizer, FDA Hid Failed Clinical Trials Data, Says BlackRock Advisor

Article copied from Childrenshealthdefense.com.

In an interview with Naomi Wolf, former BlackRock investment advisor Edward Dowd explained why Wall Street lost faith in Pfizer and Moderna stocks when Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration tried to hide clinical trial data.

In an interview with Naomi Wolf, of the Daily Clout, investment advisor Edward Dowd discussed why investors are dumping COVID-19 vaccine makers’ stocks.

Dowd, a former managing director with BlackRock from 2002 to 2012, grew BlackRock’s growth strategy from $2 billion-$14 billion over 10 years.

Wolf introduced Dowd:

“He’s the extraordinarily kind of courageous, well-informed whistleblower who has come forward to explain to audiences why in his view, Pfizer has committed a fraud.”

Dowd described how his initial caution about taking the experimental COVID vaccine led him to research data related to Pfizer’s clinical trials.

Dowd told Wolf:

“I learned from a friend in the biotech industry that Pfizer had failed its all-cause mortality endpoint in the initial trial … All-cause mortality is the gold standard in any drug trial at the FDA. When you fail that endpoint, the drug is not approved.”

When Big Pharma and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were unwilling to release vaccine safety data, Dowd grew even more skeptical about the vaccines, he said, and was compelled to speak out privately and publicly about what he believed was a major deception:

“I got more loud about fraud when the FDA decided to hide the clinical data for 75 years. I’m an investor, so let me just say how I think about the world. I don’t wait for people to tell me what just happened. My job was to come up with an analysis, mosaic and investment thesis, and then over time I’d be proven right.

“So I don’t wait for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal or The Washington Post to tell me anything. Because by the time that happens, the opportunity to make money is lost. So I started screaming fraud as soon as I saw that — because it’s unprecedented to hide data from the public.”

It was a report from the CEO of a major life insurance company that confirmed Dowd’s doubts:

“If this vaccine was as deadly and injurious as we thought, we’d see the insurance companies and the funeral home results. These are databases that aren’t being hidden from us by the government. So, unfortunately, in early January, a signal was launched by One America.

“The CEO didn’t really know what he was saying or the implications of it — because he didn’t think it was the vaccine, but he got on a Chamber of Commerce call in Indiana, and he said that in the second half of 2021, he was seeing a 40% increase in all-cause mortality — non-COVID. And to put some meat on those bones, a 10% increase he said would be a three-standard deviation [increase], which in math in my world is a big deal.”

Dowd described the impact on the financial world and on his current work:

“Wall Street is listening to me now because they’re nervous and a lot of them are jabbed as well. And if you look at the stocks of Moderna and Pfizer, Moderna is down 70% and Pfizer is down 20 plus percent.

“So my goal has been to raise consciousness across the country and the globe, by pointing out that even though the mainstream media is not going to save us — and it doesn’t seem like the politicians or the regulators are, because they’re in on it — we have to spread the word.”

Wolf asked Dowd about the repercussions of his public position:

“One of the things you’ve said, unequivocally, not mincing words — this is fraud. So if you are not right, that’s actionable, I believe, and Pfizer and Moderna could come at you with a libel suit or a slander suit. But I believe that has not happened yet. Will you speak to that?”

Dowd replied:

“I don’t have a medical license to take away. I don’t have a bar license to take away. I’m an investor. And throughout the history of Wall Street, investors have what we call a thesis. So I present this as a thesis — I’m a hundred percent convinced it’s fraud. I’ve laid out my case and it’s starting to appear, it’s coming to light that it is, but I can say this is freedom of speech. They can sue me if they want. I don’t suspect they will.”

Dowd said he’s been waiting for a “hit piece on me,” but there haven’t been any yet. He said because what he’s presenting is an investment thesis, he’s protected under free speech laws.

“Here’s the problem, Dowd said. “The proof of the fraud is showing up in real-life results. And that is becoming undeniable and impossible to hide.”

Read these related articles:

FDA officials resigned.

FDA Advisory Panel Votes 16-2 For No Booster Shots.

Dr. Steve Kirsch Bombshell Testimony at FDA Vaccine Hearing

Naomi Wolf, former BlackRock investment advisor Edward Dowd

(via Emerald Robinson) >> It’s official: the new vaccines are killing people. That’s what the data shows. 👇👇https://t.co/EzEiIf8KUi
— Giomerica (on GETTR @Giomerica) ✝️🇺🇸🍊🚛 (@ScottGiorgini) March 18, 2022

It’s always comforting when governments hide death data from the public. That is what I call a tell & prima facie evidence of fraud.

For those still in the matrix be sure to double up your mask, get your 4th booster & go march this weekend to virtue signal your support for 🇺🇦!
— Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle (@DowdEdward) March 18, 2022

John Durham is working on largest criminal conspiracy in US history

Devin Nunes Lee Smith Kash Patel on Truth Social.

Over 5 million questionable ballots in the 2020 Election have been identified to date in three states – Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. These ballots were counted and prevented a President Trump win in each of these states and nationally.

A recent report by Daniel Horowitz at The Blaze on the Department of Defense manipulating epidemiological data after the initial data for 2021 revealed a MASSIVE increase, by 988%, in doctor visits by US military members in 2021.

Database artifact, smoking gun, or something in between?

What happened in 2021? Could it be the mandatory COVID vaccines? A recent report by Daniel Horowitz at The Blaze on the Department of Defense manipulating epidemiological data after the initial data for 2021 revealed a MASSIVE increase, by 988%, in doctor visits by US military members in 2021.

The initial data was presented during Sen. Ron Johnson’s five-hour hearing on a “COVID-19: Second Opinion” by Ohio attorney Thomas Renz, who has been representing clients suing the vaccine mandates.

In response to the report, the US military claimed the five previous years were plagued by a giant clitch.

According to the Department of Defense, the actual number of doctor visits and ambulatory care in the military is at least TEN TIMES higher than was being reported since 2016!

There is undoubtedly a public health and national security crisis in the military, and the Pentagon’s reaction only seems to be concerned with exonerating the vaccine, not fixing its own alleged problem.

It’s now certain that the military’s health surveillance system — DMED — showed a massive increase in sickness and injury diagnoses in 2021 over previous years, particularly in the neurological, cardiovascular, oncological, and reproductive health categories. The military, in a very terse and cryptic statement to PolitiFact last week, admitted as much, but claimed without any further explanation that the data in the system accessed by several military doctors working with attorney Thomas Renz was only a “fraction” of the true numbers that existed. In the words of the Pentagon spokesman, it was a “glitch in the database.” Where those true numbers existed, why they weren’t in the system for five years, what exactly was in the system, and why the 2021 numbers were accurate according to the DOD account remain a mystery.

However, one by one, the military public health officials have been adding back random numbers to the 2016 through 2020 codes. I’m told by Renz and two of the whistleblowers that throughout the past week, they have queried the same data again, and in most of the ICD categories, they have found that the numbers from 2016 through 2020 were “increased” exponentially to look as though 2021 was not an abnormal year. This has been done without any transparency, any press release, any statement of narrative, and sloppily in a way that makes the already unbelievable narrative simply impossible to believe.

In addition to believing that every epidemiological report for five years was somehow completely tainted with false data — including during the first year of the pandemic itself — we would have to believe that the minute they discovered this from Renz, they suddenly discovered the exact numbers. A five-year mistake fixed overnight!

Was Mass Vaccinating in the Public’s Interest or Pfizer’s?

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Reports $37B COVID Vaccine Sales in 2021

Pfizer reported global sales and alliance revenue from its abortion-tainted COVID vaccine brought in $36.78 billion in 2021, helping to more than double profits across its business operations compared with 2020.

In an earnings report issued Tuesday, the pharmaceutical giant also estimated that sales of its vaccine and anti-viral pill will top $54 billion in 2022, buoying shareholders’ hopes that profits at the company might soar for the second year in a row.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said the company plans to aggressively expand the use of messenger RNA beyond just COVID vaccines, pointing to potential treatments of muscle, the liver and nervous system, despite warnings from many researchers that the use of mRNA technology carries significant risks.

Despite record earnings, Pfizer shares fell 3% yesterday on Wall Street due to lower than expected 2022 sales forecasts for its anti-viral pill, Paxlovid, which it sells at $530 a course in the United States.

Anti-viral pills like ivermectin, which health chiefs have sought to ban or restrict, typically sell for a few dollars when available, with several scientists suggesting the much-maligned pills are more effective than those produced by Pfizer.

Pfizer said its overall sales in 2022 across the company’s product range could reach $102 billion.

“In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, we committed to use all of the resources and expertise we had at our disposal to help protect populations globally against this deadly virus, as well as to offer treatments to help avoid the worst outcomes when infections do occur,” Bourla said yesterday. “We put billions of dollars of capital on the line in pursuit of those goals, not knowing whether those investments would ever pay off.”

Reacting to the earnings on Twitter, some commentators remarked on how beneficial mass-vaccination programs had been to the company’s balance sheet.

Bourla also said yesterday that Pfizer’s vaccine for the Omicron variant would not be ready for distribution until March, casting further doubt on calls from health officials and mainstream media outlets to vaccinate people now with shots made for previous variants.

Was mass vaccinating in the public’s interest or Pfizer’s? https://t.co/ojPAhfiCNE
— Lisa Boothe (@LisaMarieBoothe) February 8, 2022

The CEO acknowledged that the eradication of COVID is unlikely to be achieved because of mutations and the virus’ global spread, with some scientists previously warning that new vaccines were contributing to the growth of variants.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer vice president and chief scientist for respiratory research, last week called on the media to apologize for their “lies” about vaccine safety as leaked data from the U.S. military indicated a 300% increase in miscarriages in 2021.

Yeadon, who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with the most senior research position in his field, was an author of a submitted petition to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in December 2020 that raised substantial concerns regarding a lack of sufficient testing of the experimental COVID-19 gene-based vaccines before their emergency use authorizations.

With regard to the possibility of the shots endangering the fertility of women, Yeadon and his colleague, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, wrote, “There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case, this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”

Such a possibility would need to be ruled out through standard experimentation before imposing such substances onto the entire population, according to the doctors.

“It’s important to note that none of these gene-based agents had completed what’s called ‘reproductive toxicology,’” Yeadon wrote in his recent statement. “Over a year later, this battery of tests in animals still has not been done. So there was and still is no data package supporting safety in pregnancy or prior to conception.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released data in December showing a total of 965,843 reports of adverse events after COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 10, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The data included a total of 20,244 reports of deaths and 155,506 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same period.

Doctor Angelique Coetzee Who Discovered Omicron Was Pressured Not To Reveal It's Mild

When asked if it's true, Coetzee replied: "I was told not to state publicly that it was a mild illness. I have been asked to refrain from making such statements and to say that it is a serious illness. I declined." (translated).

"What does that mean?" replied Welt.

"I am a clinician and based on the clinical picture there are no indications that we are dealing with a very serious disease. The course is mostly mild. I'm not saying you won't get sick if you're mild.

"The definition of mild Covid-19 disease is clear, and it is a WHO definition: patients can be treated at home and oxygen or hospitalization is not required," she said, adding: "A serious illness is one in which we see acute pulmonary respiratory infections: people need oxygen, maybe even artificial respiration. We saw that with Delta - but not with Omikron. So I said to people, "I can't say it like that because it's not what we're seeing.""

When asked why she was prevented from telling the truth, Coetzee said "They tried, but they didn't make it."

"What I said at one point – because I was just tired of it – was: In South Africa this is a mild illness, but in Europe it is a very serious one. That's what your politicians wanted to hear."

According to Coetzee, she wasn't pressured by South African authorities - and was instead criticized by scientists in the UK and Netherlands, who said "How can you explain that it's a mild disease? It's a serious illness. Look at the mutations."

My reports have thrown them off track. In a pandemic, you also have to look at what is happening at the grassroots level. The general practitioners who treat the sick every day must be asked what they experience, how the clinical picture presents itself. -Welt

When Omicron first emerged, Dr. Anthony Fauci played dumb right after praising South African doctors, saying: "The things that we don’t know right now are whether the people who do get infected have a severer form of the disease or whether it’s a light disease or somewhat the same as delta."

Judge Orders FDA To Show Pfizer Data Hidden From Public

I am pleased to report a federal judge rejected the FDA's request to produce the Pfizer Covid vaccine data at 500 pages per month and instead ordered a rate of 55,000 pages per month! Everyone should read the Judge's excellent 3-page decision available at https://t.co/ziqCs9fA9J
— Aaron Siri (@AaronSiriSG) January 6, 2022

On behalf of a client, my firm requested that the FDA produce all the data submitted by Pfizer to license its Covid-19 vaccine. The FDA asked the Court for permission to only be required to produce at a rate of 500 pages per month, which would have taken over 75 years to produce all the documents.

I am pleased to report that a federal judge soundly rejected the FDA’s request and ordered the FDA to produce all the data at a clip of 55,000 pages per month!

This is a great win for transparency and removes one of the strangleholds federal “health” authorities have had on the data needed for independent scientists to offer solutions and address serious issues with the current vaccine program – issues which include waning immunity, variants evading vaccine immunity, and, as the CDC has confirmed, that the vaccines do not prevent transmission.

1. The FDA shall produce the “more than 12,000 pages” articulated in its own proposal, see ECF No. 29 at 24, on or before January 31, 2022.

2. The FDA shall produce the remaining documents at a rate of 55,000 pages every 30 days, with the first production being due on or before March 1, 2022, until production is complete.

3. To the extent the FDA asserts any privilege, exemption, or exclusion as to any responsive record or portion thereof, FDA shall, concurrent with each production required by this Order, produce a redacted version of the record, redacting only those portions as to which privilege, exemption, or exclusion is asserted.

4. The Parties shall submit a Joint Status Report detailing the progress of the rolling production by April 1, 2022, and every 90 days thereafter.[6]

SO ORDERED on this 6th day of January, 2022.

Robert Malone on the Joe Rogan Experience Podcast

Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of the nine original mRNA vaccine patents, which were originally filed in 1989 (including both the idea of mRNA vaccines and the original proof of principle experiments) and RNA transfection. Dr. Malone, has close to 100 peer-reviewed publications which have been cited over 12,000 times. Since January 2020, Dr. Malone has been leading a large team focused on clinical research design, drug development, computer modeling and mechanisms of action of repurposed drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. Dr. Malone is the Medical Director of The Unity Project, a group of 300 organizations across the US standing against mandated COVID vaccines for children. He is also the President of the Global Covid Summit, an organization of over 16,000 doctors and scientists committed to speaking truth to power about COVID pandemic research and treatment.

CDC Admits Destroying Rights of Naturally Immune Without Any Proof They Transmit Virus

After formal demand, the CDC concedes it does not have proof of a single instance of a naturally immune individual spreading the virus.

Aaron Siri's Substack

You would assume that if the CDC was going to crush the civil and individual rights of those with natural immunity by having them expelled from school, fired from their jobs, separated from the military, and worse, the CDC would have proof of at least one instance of an unvaccinated, naturally immune individual transmitting the COVID-19 virus to another individual. If you thought this, you would be wrong.

My firm, on behalf of ICAN, asked the CDC for precisely this proof (see below). ICAN wanted to see proof of any instance in which someone who previously had COVID-19 became reinfected with and transmitted the virus to someone else. The CDC’s incredible response is that it does not have a single document reflecting that this has ever occurred. Not one. (See letter above.)

In contrast, there are endless documents reflecting cases of vaccinated individuals becoming infected with and transmitting the virus to others. Such as this study. And this study. And this study. And this study. It goes on and on…

But it gets worse. The CDC’s excuse for not having a shred of evidence of the naturally immune transmitting the virus is that “this information is not collected.” What?! No proof! But yet the CDC is actively crushing the rights of millions of naturally immune individuals in this country if they do not get the vaccine on the assumption they can transmit the virus. But despite clear proof the vaccinated spread the virus, the CDC lifts restrictions on the vaccinated?! That is dystopian.

The facts about natural immunity are simple. Every single peer reviewed study has found that the naturally immune have far greater than 99% protection from having COVID-19, and this immunity does not wane. In contrast, the COVID-19 vaccine provides, at best, 95% protection and this immunity wanes rapidly. I am no mathematician, but a constant 99% seems preferable to a 95% that quickly drops. And, while the vaccinated readily transmit the virus, not so for the naturally immune.

The lesson yet again is not that health authorities should never make mistakes. They will. It happens. The lesson is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Everyone, the naturally immune or otherwise, who wants to get vaccinated and boosted should be free to do so. But nobody should be coerced by the government to partake in any medical procedure.

Lawyers smell blood in the water.

CDC Admits It Has No Record of an Unvaccinated Person Spreading Covid After Recovering From Covid

The CDC admitted it has no record of an unvaccinated person spreading Covid after recovering from Covid in response to an attorney’s FOIA request.

A New York attorney filed a FOIA request in September asking for “documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who (1) never received a Covid-19 vaccine; (2) was infected with Covid-19 once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS CoV-2 to another person when reinfected.”

The CDC responded: “A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request.

The CDC Emergency Operation Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected.”

In response to attorney’s FOIA request, US CDC admits that it has no record of an unvaccinated person spreading COVID after recovering from COVID.

Lawyers smelling blood in the water. pic.twitter.com/ajdOuiIyjj

— Michael P Senger (@MichaelPSenger) November 12, 2021

A study examining T cell responses in Covid-19 convalescent individuals published earlier this year revealed natural immunity provides better protection against the China virus than vaccination.

Dr. Fauci, great news! T cell immunity after natural infection shown to include variants. Do we still need to wear multiple masks after we’ve recovered or been vaccinated?https://t.co/sSsE66wJbs

— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) March 31, 2021

Natural immunity doesn’t make Big Pharma any money which is why the Biden Regime and the CDC never talk about it.

“After formal demand, CDC concedes it does not have proof of a single instance of a naturally immune individual spreading the virus”

CDC Admits Crushing Rights of Naturally Immune Without Proof They Transmit the Virus - by Aaron Siri - Injecting Freedom https://t.co/O8nWAH8xHH
— Jess (@JessClarke007) November 11, 2021

FBI and So. District of NY Raid Project Veritas Journalists’ Homes

FBI and Southern District of NY Raid Project Veritas Journalists’ Homes.

It's alleged that someone stole Joe Biden's Daughters Diary (according to this article). If it is legitimate there are some serious allegations of sexual assault in the diary.

The FBI raided two addresses in New York on Thursday linked to Project Veritas, as part of a probe into the alleged theft of President Biden's daughter's diary, according to the New York Times, which curiously knew about the raid an hour after it happened, according to Veritas founder James O'Keefe.

Search warrants were executed at a Midtown Manhattan apartment of longtime Veritas employee Spencer Meads.

While Veritas did not publish excerpts of the diary, another conservative outlet ran dozens of handwritten pages from it on October 24, 2020 in the final days of the US presidential election. The website claimed that they received the documents from a whistleblower at another organization that would not publish the information.

According to the report, Project Veritas said it knew the whereabouts of the actual diary and had a recording of Ashley Biden admitting it was hers.

"Late last year, we were approached by tipsters claiming they had a copy of Ashley Biden’s diary," said O'Keefe," adding "the tipsters indicated that they were negotiating with a different media outlet for the payment of monies for the diary."

"At the end of the day, we made the ethical decision that because, in part, we could not determine if the diary was real, if the diary, in fact, belonged to Ashley Biden, or if the contents of the diary occurred, we could not publish the diary and any part thereof."

O'Keefe said that they turned the diary over to law enforcement after Ashley Biden's attorney refused to accept or authenticate it.

The PV founder added in a statement: "We do not know how The New York Times was aware of the execution of a search warrant at our reporter’s home, or the subject matter of the search warrant, as a Grand Jury investigation is secret."

The Times claims that the DOJ has been investigating the matter since October 2020, after a representative from the Biden family reported that several of Ashley Biden's personal items were stolen in a burglary.

Watch all of the videos that Project Veritas has exposed on the fraud.

NJ Election Worker: ‘I’ll let you [Non-Citizen/Non-Registered Voter] fill out a ballot.'

7 Insane Facts About How U.S. Elections Are ‘Rigged’

1. The DNC Controlled All Poll Watchers for 40 Years

Don't Trust The Vaccine Hypocrisy of Biden & Democrats

Compilation of public statements by Democratic leaders. It's science ... not politics!