Anyone Else Seeing An Uptick in Oncology Cancer Cases?

Suspended from Twitter for speaking the truth.  Oncology cases through the roof in 2021. 

I have 2 vaccinated friends who are have seen new tumors in the last month.  One confirmed breast cancer.  Another is still pending diagnosis.  

Massive Private Equity Companies Like Black Rock & Vanguard Control Our World

Watch 51 minutes into this video where Robert Malone discusses this massive investment capital that is driving destructive Government decision-making and big pharma corruption.  

Consolidation of capital is no longer constrained by a nation-state.  These massive private equity companies now control the World and all they care about is the return on investment.  They control all decisions in Government and the Federal Reserve.  They have war game tools to train politicians. 

Racing to $20 Trillion
BlackRock capital pie chart
BlackRock $4.3 Trillion
This was 2013 over 8 years ago!

Few people are as qualified to comment on the course of the COVID pandemic and the mass vaccination campaign as Dr. Malone. In this important interview, he shares his unique and deep insights on matters of critical national and international importance 

In an exclusive and explosive one-hour interview with Veronika Kyrylenko of The New American, pioneering mRNA scientist Dr. Robert Malone explains the intensely corrupt workings of the government regulatory bodies that have mismanaged the pandemic, discusses the problems with the vaccine program and delves into potentially explosive and game-changing revelations about the shady origins of the Covid-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China.

Who is Dr. Robert Malone? While working at the Salk Institute in 1988, Dr. Malone discovered important findings about in-vivo and in-vitro RNA transfection. He continued his work on the technology a year later at the biopharma start-up Vical where he conducted additional experiments. According to his bio, “The mRNA, constructs, reagents were developed at the Salk institute and Vical by Dr. Malone.” His research has also included important work on DNA vaccines. In addition to his fundamental work developing mRNA and DNA vaccine technology, Malone is also a medical doctor. According to his bio, Dr. Malone “received his medical training at Northwestern University (MD) and Harvard University (Clinical Research Post Graduate) medical school, and in Pathology at UC Davis."

Few people are as qualified to comment on the course of the COVID pandemic and the mass vaccination campaign as Dr. Malone. In this important interview, he shares his unique and deep insights on matters of critical national and international importance.

How Angry Moms Are Saving Our Democracy From Mass Hypnosis

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine, breaks down the "mass formation" phenomenon that makes it difficult to reason with those who have fallen victim to the globalist leader propaganda. Hear what he says is the hope we have before a total takeover.

As many of you know, I have spent time researching and speaking about mass psychosis theory. Most of what I have learned has come from Dr. Mattias Desmet, who realized that this form of mass hypnosis, of the madness of crowds, can account for the strange phenomenon of about 20-30% of the population in the western world becoming entranced with the Noble Lies and dominant narrative concerning the safety and effectiveness of the genetic vaccines, and both propagated and enforced by politicians, science bureaucrats, pharmaceutical companies and legacy media.

What one observes with the mass hypnosis is that a large fraction of the population is completely unable to process new scientific data and facts demonstrating that they have been misled about the effectiveness and adverse impacts of mandatory mask use, lockdowns, and genetic vaccines that cause people’s bodies to make large amounts of the biologically active coronavirus Spike protein.

These hypnotized by this process are unable to recognize the lies and misrepresentations they are being bombarded with on a daily basis, and actively attack anyone who has the temerity to share information with them which contradicts the propaganda that they have come to embrace. And for those whose families and social networks have been torn apart by this process, and who find that close relatives and friends have ghosted them because they question the officially endorsed “truth” and are actually following the scientific literature, this can be a source of deep anguish, sorrow, and psychological pain.

It is with those souls in mind that I included a discussion of the mass formation theory of Dr. Mattias Desmet during a recent talk I gave in Tampa, Florida to an audience of about 2,000.  As I looked out into the audience and spoke, I could see the relief on many faces, and even tears running from the eyes of stoic men.

Unknown to me, someone recorded the speech and appended the vocal track to a series of calming images of natural landscapes, producing a video that has gone viral throughout the world.  A link to the video, as well as some notes to clarify and supplement the talk, are appended below. Many have told me that they find it very healing.  I hope it may help you also.
A brief overview of Mass Formation, which was developed by Dr. Mattias Desmet. He is a psychologist and a statistician. He is at the University of Ghent in Belgium.  I think Dr. Mattias is onto something about what is happening and he calls this phenomenon:


So, when he says “mass” formation, you can think of this as equivalent to “crowd” formation. One can think of this as:


The conditions to set up mass formation psychosis include lack of social connectedness and sensemaking as well as large amounts of latent anxiety and passive aggression. When people are inundated with a narrative that presents a plausible "object of anxiety" and strategy for coping with it, then many individuals group together to battle the object with a collective singlemindedness. This allows people to stop focusing on their own problems, avoiding personal mental anguish. Instead, they focus all their thought and energy on this new object.

As mass formation progresses, the group becomes increasingly bonded and connected. Their field of attention is narrowed and they become unable to consider alternative points of view.  Leaders of the movement are revered, unable to do no wrong. 

Left unabated, a society under the spell of mass formation will support a totalitarian governance structure capable of otherwise unthinkable atrocities in order to maintain compliance. A note: mass formation is different from groupthink. There are easy ways to fix group think by just bringing in dissenting voices and making sure you give them platforms.  It isn’t so easy with mass formation.  Even when the narrative falls apart, cracks in the strategy clearly aren’t solving the issue, the hypnotized crowd can’t break free of the narrative.  This is what appears to be happening now with COVID-19.  The solution for those in control of the narrative is to produce bigger and bigger lies to prop up the solution.  Those being controlled by mass formation no longer are able to use reason to break free of the group narrative.

Of course, the obvious example of mass formation is Germany in the 1930s and 40s. How could the German people who were highly educated, very liberal in the classic sense; western thinking people… how could they go so crazy and do what they did to the Jews? How could this happen?
To a civilized people?  A leader of a mass formation movement will use the platform to continue to pump the group with new information to focus on.  In the case of COVID-19, I like to use the term “fear porn.”  Leaders, through mainstream media and government channels continuously feed the “beast” with more messaging that focuses and further hypnotize their adherents.

Studies suggest that mass formation follows a general distribution:

30% are brainwashed, hypnotized, indoctrinated by the group narrative

40% in the middle are persuadable and may follow if no worthy alternative is perceived

30% fight against the narrative.

Those that rebel and fight against the narrative, become the enemy of the brainwashed and a primary target of aggression.

One of the best ways to counter mass formation is for those against the narrative to continue to speak out against it, which serves to help break the hypnosis of some in the brainwashed group as well as persuade the persuadable middle to choose reason over mindlessness.

Dr. Desmet suggests that for something as big as COVID-19, the only way to break the mass formation psychosis is to give the crowd something bigger to focus on.  He believes that totalitarianism maybe that bigger issue.  Of course, after COVID-19, global totalitarianism may be the biggest issue of our time.  

Justice Will Be Served For These Deaths. Share This & Save Lives


Judy was one of the first scientists to speak out on this issue of mass vaccination and she took a lot of heat and still does.  She is fighting for justice and that is what the American people want most.  Everyone will get what they deserve.  

Some citizens proud to have taken part in the vaccination campgain

List of Young Athletes Who Died Suddenly of Cardiac Arrest. Why?

athletes sudden death

No official word on the cause of death for the 33-year-old former All-Pro who retired just 5 months ago.
Demaryius Thomas Dies Suddenly at Age 33? Why? Why? Why? Why?    
If you have been following soccer of futbol in Europe you will know there have been lots of similar deaths. 

Professional and amateur athletics worldwide are seeing an unprecedented spike in deaths of athletes. In fact, the number has climbed so high, Wikipedia has stopped reporting the number of soccer players who have died during play as of October 2021.

If you study the reasons for death amongst athletes, you will see a high occurrence of heart issues and attacks. This finding is consistent with the fact that scientists and doctors have been warning continuously that the mRNA jab is causing heart problems in healthy young boys and men; and that those conditions are 6 times as likely to cause hospitalization than COVID-19.

list athletes died suddenly

Here are more articles highlighting this topic 

"Fact Checking" Facebook Sued by John Stossel for Lies

Surprisingly little attention is being paid to a bombshell admission made by the attorneys representing the corporation formerly known as Facebook, Inc., which has now transitioned into Meta Platforms, Inc.

John Stossel going to have a field day on his social media with this one.

He's a great journalist. An actual journalist with a conservative lean but always open to getting the truth and actual facts.  JohnStossel.comGive him a look, really good stuff that fits very well with most people's political leanings here. Specifically reasonable people who appreciate the facts and the truth.

In a court filing responding to a lawsuit filed by John Stossel claiming that he was defamed by a “fact check” Facebook used to label a video by him as “misleading,” Meta’s attorneys assert that the “fact check” was an “opinion,” not an actual check of facts and declaration of facts. Under libel law, opinions are protected from liability for libel.

Anthony Watts of Wattsupwiththat explains:

Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation. The quote in Facebook’s complaint is,

Meta’s attorneys come from the white-shoe law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dore, with over a thousand attorneys and more than a billion dollars a year in revenue. They obviously checked out the implications of the matter for Section 230 issues, the legal protection Facebook/Meta have from liability for what is posted on their site. But at a minimum, this is a public relations disaster, revealing that their “fact checks” are not factual at all and should be labeled as “our opinion" or some such language avoiding the word “fact.”

As an amateur, it seems to me that if Facebook inserts its opinions into posts or blocks them because of its opinion, then that does make it a publisher with legal responsibility for what appears on its website.

Technically speaking Facebook farms out its “fact-checking” to outside organizations, usually left-wing groups. In the case of Stossel’s video that was defamed, the outside website called “Climate Feedback,” which is also named a defendant in the lawsuit.

Watts summarizes well the PR implications:

Such “fact checks” are now shown to be simply an agenda to suppress free speech and the open discussion of science by disguising liberal media activism as something supposedly factual, noble, neutral, trustworthy, and based on science.

In light of Facebook’s admission, it’s time for the Washington Post to offer a correction to this piece by Ethan Porter and Thomas J. Wood, published less than a month ago, titled “Fact checks actually work, even on Facebook. But not enough people see them.”

So-called "fact-checking" is a fraud used to cover up the censorship of opinions that differ from those of the powerful Silicon Valley oligarchy.  And now we have proof attested to in a court filing by one of the richest companies in the world, represented by some of the most elite lawyers in the world.

New York Times vs Sullivan must be overturned so defamation is actionable in civil court like it was previous to that decision. We also need to look into criminalizing political fraud. "How do you decide what's true?" Juries do it all the time or there wouldn't be laws against perjury or economic fraud or lying to government agents.

Facebook, Twitter, etc is suitable only for Mass Formation adherents, not free thinkers. Unfortunately, they function as powerful propaganda machines capable of swaying elections and public policy opinion. The weak-minded are extremely susceptible to suggestion. Social media is fully aware of this, and takes advantage of it. 

FB started out as a data mining operation people volunteered for and has turned into a control tool of communism.

Zuckerburg absolutely had many "irons in the fire" of the stolen election.

Democrats are known for changing the meaning of common words.  Man/Woman no longer means what science says it means.  So, they changed the meaning of science.  Now, "Science" is their religion of anti-science completely devoid of logic and the scientific method.  Why not change the meaning of fact too.  News has become opinion, so it only makes sense that facts should be opinion too.  ...or, "my truth" as they like to say. 

The courts will not solve this. Congress will not solve this. Jackbooted thugs are in power at every level of the governments and corporations.  History and facts are decided upon by those in power who can dictate their "truth" to the masses.  

If you want to read a truly egregious bit of "Fact Checking", try this: Fact check: Nurse who fainted after COVID-19 vaccine did not die Spoiler - nobody has proved she is still alive and I personally don't think she is. 

See our other articles on phony Fact Checking

Twitter Poll Shows The Tide Is Turning on Fake News & Boosters

Pfizer Clinical Trail Data Won't Be Released Until 2096. What Are They Hiding?

As attorney Siri writes “this is “Not a typo.” They are demanding 75 years of data secrecy. Yes, the FDA is agreeing to share about 12,000 pages in the first couple of months but thereafter they would release, at a snail’s...

Outrageous Lack of Transparency—Pfizer Now Asks Court for 75 Years to Hide Details of COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Results.

TrialSite has tracked attorney Aaron Siri and his client’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case against Pfizer for full disclosure of clinical trials documentation. Siri shared in a previous post that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked a federal judge to delay the full disclosure of all relevant documentation till 2076—55 years from now! 

Siri, who is a partner with the law firm Siri Glimstad representing the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) countered to the court that Pfizer should disclose the entire batch of documentation within 108 days which just happens to be the amount of time it took for the Gold Standard regulatory agency to review and approve Pfizer’s vaccine. After the court-ordered both parties to submit updated briefs, now in what can only be considered an insult to injury, Pfizer “doubles down.” Meaning the pharmaceutical company now wants to hide the extent of all of the material information till 2096.

Here are some Tweets showing what they are hiding . . .

LAUSD To Lose Court Fight to Impose Vaccine Mandates

LAUSD School District Map

Children’s Health Defense California chapter employed attorney Nicole Pearson to challenge the LA school district’s ability to impose a vaccine mandate for kids.

The papers were filed last week for a preliminary injunction. At Nicole’s request, I was one of about 10 experts who filed an affidavit in support of CHD’s motion.

The hearing was today. The judge walked in with a 12-page proposed order denying CHD’s motion.

Nicole wasn’t going to let that happen. She made a brilliant argument that if the order were to be signed by the judge that every school district in California would be able to set the medical policy for all kids and the State would thus lose control. She also pointed out that schools shouldn’t be allowed to dictate medical policy for kids. If they can do it for vaccines, then they should be able to require birth control so kids don’t get pregnant and miss school, etc., etc.

The judge is now having second thoughts. He didn’t issue his order and is now going back to re-think his position. We are all optimistic he will strike down LAUSD’s ability to set medical policy for kids.

Congratulations Nicole! GREAT JOB.

Could Omicron Be The Cure For Covid? Natural Immunity?

Omicron is spreading quickly but producing no serious symptoms in those who are said to be "infected" with it. It appears that omicron, despite being widely hyped by the scientifically illiterate corporate media, may have finally reached "seasonal flu" status in terms of its relatively mild impact on human health.

And that means omicron might be the cure for covid. It could end this entire pandemic without the need for vaccines, masks, social distancing or lockdowns. By simply allowing omicron to sweep through the human population -- producing almost zero deaths -- the entire world could become immune to covid and we could end all the global madness, including Australia's totalitarian "covid concentration camps" that are making global headlines.

Yesterday I interviewed Steve Kirsch, a highly intelligent, data-driven analyst who has been making huge wave on Substack with his articles on covid vaccines (and their long-term effects on humanity). That full interview will be posted today on my channel at

In that interview, Kirsch dropped a bombshell. He explained that omicron so far appears to be very mild but highly infectious, following a rather typical path of viral host adaptation. As a result, he explained that if a person had to choose which variant to be infected with, they would vastly prefer omicron, since it has so far killed no one (to our knowledge at this point) and yet provokes the body into producing a powerful immune response that confers immunity against all covid variants (including Delta).

Kirsch was right on the money: Omicron is spreading quickly but producing no serious symptoms in those who are said to be “infected” with it. It appears that omicron, despite being widely hyped by the scientifically illiterate corporate media, may have finally reached “seasonal flu” status in terms of its relatively mild impact on human health.

And that means omicron might be the cure for covid. It could end this entire pandemic without the need for vaccines, masks, social distancing or lockdowns. By simply allowing omicron to sweep through the human population — producing almost zero deaths — the entire world could become immune to covid and we could end all the global madness, including Australia’s totalitarian “covid concentration camps” that are making global headlines.

Pfizer would miss out on billions in new variant vaccine revenues, of course, which is why Fauci and the entire criminal cabal of Big Pharma corona con artists will fight against natural immunity in every way possible.

If omicron is the cure, that would explain why governments are cutting off world travel to prevent it from spreading

Does this realization explain why governments of the world are suddenly banning flights from South Africa and cutting off travel? Maybe they don’t want omicron to spread and replace the “delta” variant because delta produces far higher fatalities that feed into the media’s pro-vaccine fear narrative.

If omicron takes over the world, the pandemic is essentially over and they can’t drive people into the depopulation vaccines. Compliance is based on fear, and without the deaths, the fear can’t be maintained.

This brings us to the realization that the vaccine IS the pandemic. When people are vaccinated and injected with spike protein bioweapons — or the mRNA instructions for their bodies to manufacture those spike protein nanoparticles — they often suffer adverse reactions or even death. These deaths are blamed on “covid” when the real culprit is often the vaccines themselves. Without the vaccines, this pandemic would flame out all by itself.

As the American Heart Association’s Circulation journal recently published, mRNA covid vaccines “dramatically increase endothelial inflammatory markers” and, “may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”

Furthermore, the recently released Pfizer postmarketing experience document — just released by the FDA under court order — reveals that both Pfizer and the FDA knew in early 2021 that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was killing people by the thousands, affecting three times more women than men. (See my coverage of this “smoking gun” document here.)

Natural immunity is the only permanent solution to covid, and vaccines simply can’t replace the human immune response

Ultimately, natural immunity is the only real solution to the covid plandemic. Vaccines are proving to be so disastrous that the EU is now recommending booster shots every 3 months… thereby proving that their vaccines stop working in about 3 months. The 3-month schedule will apparently continue indefinitely… or until you’re dead from the spike protein injections ripping your vascular system to shreds.

Covid vaccines don’t stop covid transmission, and they don’t prevent people from becoming infected with covid variants. Right now across the world, most of the people hospitalized with covid infections are vaccinated. Yet the only response from the tone deaf “science” community is to scream, “More vaccines!”

What we really need is more natural immunity, which means we need more exposure to a “mild” version of covid that kills almost no one.

Omicron now appears to be precisely that. It’s the globalists’ worst nightmare: Their bioweapon has adapted to become non-scary and easily beaten without vaccines. It means the Fauci fraud may be approaching its final chapter, and the scourge of covid vaccines and media lies may be coming to an end.

What the world’s leaders should actually be doing right now, in my view, is promoting vitamin D, zinc and other nutritional immune boosters, ending all mask mandates, lockdowns and vaccine mandates, and allowing omicron to invoke natural immunity across the populations of the world. Tear down the covid concentration camps and let the children finally have recess without masks.

We could all emerge from this with new, global immunity against covid. From there, we can begin the process of indicting and arresting all the covid criminals who took part in the covid “scamdemic” and put humanity through sheer hell over the last two years.

Get full details in today’s Situation Update podcast, which also covers mob looting, Italy’s “March of the Vaccine Dead,” and an update on laser cutting for hydroponic grow system.

natural immunity

Still Loaded With Antibodies 1 Year Later After Covid 19 Infection

Labcorp Antibodies Test Results Positive
Why Is Natural Immunity Still Being Ignored By The Corrupt Government & Corporate Media?

Blood test results from Labcorp show an unvaccinated family of four people still have antibodies 1 year later after infection.  Family of people with ages ranging from 12-48 still are loaded with antibodies.  

Can this family get a vaccine mandate exemption?

Here is the language used by the criminals running the CDC.  All eligible people should be vaccinated, including unvaccinated people who have previously been infected and have detectable antibodies.

Numerous immunologic studies (NO STUDIES LINKED?) have consistently shown that vaccination of individuals who were previously infected enhances their immune response, and growing epidemiologic evidence indicates that vaccination following infection further reduces the risk of subsequent infection, including in the setting of increased circulation of more infectious variants.

Risk of an MIS-like illness or the known risks of COVID-19 vaccination such as the rare risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination for people who meet the following criteria:

  1. Clinical recovery has been achieved, including return to normal cardiac function;
  2. It has been ≥90 days since their diagnosis of MIS-C;
  3. They are in an area of high or substantial community transmission of SARS-CoV-2, or otherwise have an increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 exposure and transmission; and
  4. Onset of MIS-C occurred before any COVID-19 vaccination.
People diagnosed with MIS-C or MIS-A after COVID-19 vaccination

In the rare instance of a person developing MIS-C, MIS-A, or a similar clinical illness after receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine, referral to a specialist in infectious diseases, rheumatology, or cardiology should be considered. Because MIS-C and MIS-A are conditions known to occur with SARS-CoV-2 infection, these individuals should be assessed for laboratory evidence of current or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Healthcare and public health professionals should also consider requesting a consultation from the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment COVIDvax project. In addition, all illnesses consistent with MIS-C or MIS-A occurring in persons who received any COVID-19 vaccine should be reported to VAERS.

FDA today: 42% of children 5-11 have natural immunity

42% of children 5-11 have natural immunity

Labcorp Antibodies Test Results Positive

Labcorp Antibodies Test Results Positive

Labcorp Antibodies Test Results Positive

Court Orders FDA To Comply With FOIA Docs Request


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released the first batch of documents related to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine after a federal judge ordered that they must comply with a massive Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that was filed by a government accountability group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.

The esteemed group of more than 30 professors and scientists asked the federal government to share any and all data that factored into the agency’s hasty decision to grant Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine an emergency use authorization (EUA) – which amounts to a trove of over 329,000 documents.

In a shameless effort to bury the information, the FDA challenged the FOIA request in court. After the agency was told that it must turn over the documents, Justice Department lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to allow them an unthinkable 55 years to process the request, saying that they would be able to release just 500 pages a month.

A motion that was also filed by the same group of doctors and scientists is currently pending in federal court that would force the FDA to expedite processing and releasing these documents.

Meanwhile, the FDA still has to comply with the original order to begin turning over documents. Lo and behold, the first release is a bombshell.

According to an official Pfizer document that is titled Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports, in just the first 90 days of the vaccine’s roll out under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were TENS OF THOUSANDS of reported adverse reactions, including OVER 1200 DEATHS.

The report only included adverse events to the vaccine that researchers considered “serious cases,” there were thousands more submissions that were left out of this data.

Any cases deemed “non-serious” would be processed within 90 days, but this report was released before 90 days of Pfizer’s vaccine being available had even passed.

“Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, the MAH has prioritised the processing of serious cases, in order to meet expedited regulatory reporting timelines and ensure these reports are available for signal detection and evaluation activity.

Non-serious cases are processed as soon as possible and no later than 90 days from receipt. Pfizer has also taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports.”

In all, the report states that there were a total of 42,086 case reports of individuals who had an adverse reaction to Pfizer’s vaccine worldwide, with the largest number (13,739) coming from the United States and from the UK (13,404).

According to the documents women (29,914) were over 3x more likely to experience a reaction than men (9182). A total of 1223 individuals had a fatal reaction to the experimental Pfizer vaccine.

How did the FDA not immediately pull the experimental jab out of circulation? Let alone grant multiple extensions of the EUA to Pfizer while working with the fraudulent Biden regime to push a needle into the arm of every single American.

The document also makes it clear that the data only includes “recorded adverse events,” which even the author admits is likely just a portion of the true number of adverse reactions that took place. 

Again, keep in mind, this is within the first 90 days of the Pfizer jab’s availability. 

From the Pfizer document:

“Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown.

Some of the factors that may influence whether an event is reported include: length of time since marketing, market share of the drug, publicity about a drug or an AE, seriousness of the reaction, regulatory actions, awareness by health professionals and consumers of adverse drug event reporting, and litigation.”

Pfizer’s “confidential” Covid-19 vaccine adverse reaction review ends with thousands of conditions that are of “special interest” and could possibly develop after taking their experimental jab. The single-space typed list continues for an astonishing 9 pages.

Yet somehow the paper concludes that the “review of available data” was good enough and demonstrated a “favorable benefit-risk balance” for the rushed vaccine.

What’s the benefit-risk balance on a virus that has a 99.9% recovery rate? The benefit – at least for Pfizer – is clear; It doesn’t matter how many otherwise healthy lives are lost – they are CASHING IN to the tune of $1,000 PER SECOND with a projected $36 BILLION in profit this year from the vaccine alone – it’s criminal. 

Smoking gun confidential Pfizer document exposes FDA criminal cover-up of VACCINE DEATHS… they knew the jab was killing people in early 2021… three times more WOMEN than MEN

The full document can be found here.

The FDA clearly agreed with Pfizer, extending the EUA despite the high number of deaths and serious reactions in the short amount of time Pfizer’s jab had been available.

What else are they hiding?

Omicron Variant Used To Cover Up Effects of Covid Vaccines

Government bureaucrats using the Omicron Variant to disguise the rapid increase in sudden and unexplained cardiac deaths in the vaccinated.

Recently the Botswana Government announced that a new variant of Covid had arisen from the Vaccinated. Read More.

One of the symptoms listed of the new Omicron Variant of Coronavirus; includes the following:

A number of heart-related complications may occur, including heart failure, arrhythmias, heart inflammation, and blood clots. 

This happens to be one of the primary negative effects of the COVID vaccines among men especially; which has led to a 5-fold increase in sudden and unexplained cardiac deaths in FIFA players in 2021. In fact, since December, 183 professional athletes and coaches have suddenly collapsed, 108 dead.

It looks like bureaucrats are already using the Omicron Variant to disguise the rapid increase in sudden and unexplained cardiac deaths in the vaccinated; just as they did with the Delta Variant.

Some athletes have begun to publicly question the mainstream narrative regarding these sudden cardiac events among the vaccinated.

Second US Omicron Case Is Vaccinated Adult Male Whose "Mild Symptoms" Have Fully Resolved

Not Just Players - Premier League Matches Disrupted By Fans Having 'Medical Emergencies' In The Stands

Fact Checking The Fact Checker Lies & Fake News

fact checker lies

Full article comments

One of the downsides of telling the truth in this environment is that it seems everyone and their brother wants to tear all your arguments to shreds.

I could spend full time just refuting all the hit pieces written about the content I’ve produced. Here’s my fact check of the fact-checkers as a repurposed graphic:

Rather than address every point of every fact check, here is a checklist for things that a thorough fact checker should be able to answer, but can’t or won’t.

Note that this is a quick list I put together in about 30 minutes. There are more, but you get the idea:

  1. What is my motivation for suddenly, at age 65, becoming a spreader of misinformation and conspiracy theories? And why did it only happen right after hearing about my friends who had died or been disabled by the COVID vaccines? Do you even know me or have we ever met?

  2. Dr. Toby Rogers compute 117 deaths per kid saved in ages 5 to 11? Do you agree with his analysis? 20,000 people read that article and couldn’t find a hole. So where did he go wrong and how can be sure you got it right and he got it wrong?

  3. If this is all done out of Kirsch's ego, then how is it that 30 other scientists, statisticians, and doctors all agree with him? Why did all of these people suddenly become conspiracy theorists? What’s their motivation for the fraud and deception?

  4. If the vaccines are safe, how come Alex Berenson also thinks the vaccines are unsafe? Is he also a crackpot? Isn’t it unfair just to attack Kirsch? Berenson and Kirsch hardly ever talk, yet came to the same conclusion. What about Del Bigtree? He found the same thing. In fact, Bigtree’s attorney calculated a VAERS URF of 50 well before Kirsch did. So why pick on Kirsch?

  5. If the fact checker uses a pseudonym, why can’t you tell us what your name is?  Are you going to tell us who funded you to do the hit piece?

  6. Will you debate us in a recorded zoom call where you can answer all our questions? We are eager to find out how we were fooled by all this data.

  7. If the vax is so safe, why are there so many death entries in VAERS this year?

  8. If you think there is simply “over-reporting” in VAERS this year what is your actual evidence of that? All the people we talked to are reporting more events because there are more events happening. In fact, most people report that there are at least 100X more events this year than previous years. So it seems like VAERS is actually under-reported this year, and not over-reported, don’t you think?

  9. There are 5,288 symptoms that haven’t been reported for ANY vaccine in the last 5 years that are being reported for the first time in these vaccines. Why?

  10. Why are there more adverse event reports this year than for every vaccine in the last 30 years combined?

  11. If the URF isn't 41, what is the true URF and did you calculate it using the CDC-approved methodology like we did? (see The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome).

  12. If we got it wrong, then tell us: How many people do you estimate have been killed by the COVID vaccines and how do you know?

  13. One of the ways we computed the number of deaths from the vaccine was using independent polling company. How was that gamed?

  14. Why are athletes dropping by a 60X rate after the vax rollout?

  15. How did Ernest Ramirez's son die?

  16. How do you explain the causes of death of the 14 cases the CDC examined? 5 of them died from cardiac arrest!

  17. How does he explain the results of Peter Schirmacher?

  18. Why did Taiwan report more deaths from the vaccine than from COVID?

  19. Why is the line slope going the wrong way in the Harvard study?

  20. How do you explain that the biodistribution showing accumulation in the ovaries correlate with the high numbers of VAERS symptoms for menstrual problems many with huge elevations compared to baseline (previous vaccines).

  21. Why are cardiologists reporting highly elevated # of cases of heart disease in kids after the vax rolled out?

  22. Why is the cardio testing lab at UCSF now filled with kids 7 to 10 only AFTER the vaccines rolled out for that age range?

  23. Why is a top California neurologist needing to report 2,000 VAERS events this year when in the last 11 years she's never need to report a single adverse event?

  24. How do we explain the families where 3 relatives, all previously healthy, die within days after the COVID shot?

  25. How do we explain Gavin Newsom being diagnosed with GBS within days after his booster? Isn’t it perfectly safe?

  26. How did 2 cricket players recently vaccinated drop on the field within 10 minutes of each other? Bad luck?

  27. Why does the CDC *REFUSE* to calculate and use the proper URF for VAERS when interpreting the safety data? Pfizer PROVED that VAERS is 5X underreported for myocarditis, and the CDC will not even acknowledge that? John Su is using a URF of 1. That is clearly false and misleading. Why are you not going after him? That is truly evil and corrupt. I’m not the bad guy here. This was in plain sight of the public (Pfizer slide with the Optum data (see my article about this).

  28. How come undertakers report a huge increase in business right after the vaccines rolled out?

  29. Why aren't the nursing homes disputing Abrien Aguirre's account that there were 10 times as many deaths from the vaccines than from COVID?

  30. How come the CDC hasn't ascribed even a single death from the vaccines in light of Schirmacher's study? That’s inexplicable isn’t it?

  31. Why are there so many vaccine injured people that Facebook had to remove groups of 250,000 and more (multiple times).

  32. Why aren't the vaccine injured getting any press?

  33. Why did YouTube censor Dr. Peter Doshi's testimony? UCSF Professor Aditi Bhargava spoke as well and was censored. Why? Are you speaking out about that?

  34. How come Jessica Rose’s myocarditis paper was pulled by the publisher? Are you making a stink about the corruption of science here? Or are you just trying to discredit me?

  35. What about Maddie de Garay? Why didn't the FDA, CDC, or Pfizer ever investigate? Why did Janet Woodcock assure me they would and then did nothing? Why didn't they report the truth and stop the trial on the permanent paralysis. Her result aligns PERFECTLY with the mechanism of action of the drug? How can they have eliminated the vax as the cause without ever talking to her? They are supposed to assume it is the vax until they can show otherwise.

  36. What about the 5X exclusions (vs placebo group) in the Pfizer trial? That can't be by chance can it?

  37. How come there were so few all-cause deaths in the Pfizer study? It was supposed to be a representative group! There should be been around 110 deaths in each group, right?

  38. How come Pfizer 6 months study shows more all cause deaths in the treatment group in than in the placebo group? Where is the PROOF that the vaccines are saving lives? Whoops!!!! No proof at all of a single life saved. As a fact checker, why aren’t you calling that out? Instead you are targetting me. Hmmmm.

  39. Why were there 4X as many cardiac arrests in the vax group vs. placebo in the Pfizer Phase 3 study (6 month)? Seems pretty high. It wasn’t just bad luck since we see all these athletes in plain sight dropping. So isn’t it more likely than not this is real?

  40. Aren’t you concerned that the trials going forward are too underpowered to resolve any of these questions?

  41. Wasn’t there gaming in the Pfizer Phase 3 trials on adverse event reporting where people found it difficult/impossible to report AEs.

  42. Despite the gaming of the AE reports, aren’t you alarmed at the statistically significant large increase in overall morbidity in all of the COVID vaccine trials (the paper US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good… by J. Bart Classen, MD).

  43. How come the NIH and WHO did absolutely nothing when the fluvoxamine Phase 3 trial was published in Lancet? They didn't even note it in the guidelines. Did you protest that? Why not? It’s December 2, 2021 and the fluvoxamine recommendation was Last Updated: April 23, 2021. The Lancet article was widely covered by all major media, but the NIH did nothing. How do you explain that? Why aren’t you spending your valuable time focusing on that?

  44. How come nobody can cite a SINGLE RCT that shows that masks work against COVID?

  45. How come Professor Jeffrey Morris changed the topic whenever we tried to show him that the symptoms in VAERS were dose dependent? (Note: dose dependency is one of the most impressive indicators of causality, but we use all Bradford-Hill criteria to assess causality).

  46. Dr. Steven A. Anderson of the FDA is supposed to be monitoring the VAERS data like a hawk. We have people highly qualified to who have spent months analyzing the VAERS data. Why does Dr. Anderson refuse to meet with us?

  47. How come the FDA and CDC outside committee members all turned down a $1M research grant just to talk to us for a few hours and answer questions? What are they afraid of?

  48. If the CDC and FDA members are independent, why did one of them admit in a private conversation that if they didn’t vote the way the FDA /CDC wanted they would be kicked off the committee like Martin Kulldorff.

  49. If the vaccines are so safe, then why did CDC insiders tip off a friend of mine in January not to get the vaccines?

  50. If the excess deaths in VAERS was not caused by the vaccine, then what is causing it and why isn’t the CDC investigating? These causes of death were not normal.

  51. While it is amusing for people to refer to the Mclachlan VAERS study and argue that all the deaths were normal, that’s simply not what the study said. Shall we go through all 250 cases one by one? The paper said “Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.” So it is interesting that some people can definitively state that the vaccine didn’t cause their death. Are these fact checkers willing to go through the cases one by one with Scott and our team and show us all how we got it wrong?

When you find a “fact check” that addresses those 51 questions, that would be great because I have another 130 questions just like those which I’d love to hear them explain as well.

Debunking Steve Kirsch’s latest claims about covid vaccine deaths

Here is the Medium article. Whoever wrote this “fact check” clearly spent a lot of time putting together his case. Basically, this nameless, faceless person claims that Crawford cherry picked data and that the excess death data doesn’t line up with a deadly vaccine. I just learned about this on Dec 1 at 11pm.

The author says my motivation is ego and fame. Wow. This shows you the quality of his work. Is the author willing to challenge my team in a recorded debate? I seriously doubt it. But I’ve got an open invitation to do just that! Let’s find the truth. We are not afraid of a challenge. Is he? If you are “The Gift of Fire,” then please respond in the comments.

He asks in his title: “What motivates a tech millionaire to fight against covid vaccines?” I’d have a lot more respect for him if was able to get that simple question right. But he can’t even get that one right. Everyone who knows me and works with me will tell you the answer: “Mr. Kirsch just wants to save lives.” I would argue if he can’t get something simple like that out, that we should have a lot less confidence in anything else he says.

So rather than spend our time debunking his debunk, I want to issue a challenge to our anonymous “do gooder.” We’ll address all of your points in your article, if you address all the points above all in a LIVE RECORDED zoom call where we can set the record straight.

How about it?

Healthfeedback fact check

Today, for example, someone sent me this link from the “experts” at that fact checked two statements that they claim that I made:

  1. "the ovaries get the highest concentration of [lipid nanoparticles from RNA vaccines]. This turns the ovaries into a very large manufacturing plant to turn out toxic spike protein"

  2. "FDA experts reveal the Covid-19 Vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every 1 life they save"

The short story is the first statement was taken completely out of context and was referring to a chart that was limited to showing the body parts where we did not expect to see any lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivered. The second was a quote from The Expose that I never claimed. It was their mistake, not mine.

If we address the “context problem” of the first one and they mistake by The Expose in the second one, we are left with:

  1. When we look at areas of the body where we didn’t expect to see the LNPs, the ovaries has the highest accumulation.

  2. The VAERS data shows that the vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every life that they might save. It’s not just me that says that. The Walach and Kostoff papers, published in peer reviewed medical journals, say the same thing.

The facts supporting both of these statements are pretty straightforward.

Popular Posts (Last 7 Days)