Anyone Else Seeing An Uptick in Oncology Cancer Cases?

Suspended from Twitter for speaking the truth.  Oncology cases through the roof in 2021. 

I have 2 vaccinated friends who are have seen new tumors in the last month.  One confirmed breast cancer.  Another is still pending diagnosis.  

Massive Private Equity Companies Like Black Rock & Vanguard Control Our World

Watch 51 minutes into this video where Robert Malone discusses this massive investment capital that is driving destructive Government decision-making and big pharma corruption.  

Consolidation of capital is no longer constrained by a nation-state.  These massive private equity companies now control the World and all they care about is the return on investment.  They control all decisions in Government and the Federal Reserve.  They have war game tools to train politicians. 

Racing to $20 Trillion
BlackRock capital pie chart
BlackRock $4.3 Trillion
This was 2013 over 8 years ago!

Few people are as qualified to comment on the course of the COVID pandemic and the mass vaccination campaign as Dr. Malone. In this important interview, he shares his unique and deep insights on matters of critical national and international importance 

In an exclusive and explosive one-hour interview with Veronika Kyrylenko of The New American, pioneering mRNA scientist Dr. Robert Malone explains the intensely corrupt workings of the government regulatory bodies that have mismanaged the pandemic, discusses the problems with the vaccine program and delves into potentially explosive and game-changing revelations about the shady origins of the Covid-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China.

Who is Dr. Robert Malone? While working at the Salk Institute in 1988, Dr. Malone discovered important findings about in-vivo and in-vitro RNA transfection. He continued his work on the technology a year later at the biopharma start-up Vical where he conducted additional experiments. According to his bio, “The mRNA, constructs, reagents were developed at the Salk institute and Vical by Dr. Malone.” His research has also included important work on DNA vaccines. In addition to his fundamental work developing mRNA and DNA vaccine technology, Malone is also a medical doctor. According to his bio, Dr. Malone “received his medical training at Northwestern University (MD) and Harvard University (Clinical Research Post Graduate) medical school, and in Pathology at UC Davis."

Few people are as qualified to comment on the course of the COVID pandemic and the mass vaccination campaign as Dr. Malone. In this important interview, he shares his unique and deep insights on matters of critical national and international importance.

How Angry Moms Are Saving Our Democracy From Mass Hypnosis

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine, breaks down the "mass formation" phenomenon that makes it difficult to reason with those who have fallen victim to the globalist leader propaganda. Hear what he says is the hope we have before a total takeover.

As many of you know, I have spent time researching and speaking about mass psychosis theory. Most of what I have learned has come from Dr. Mattias Desmet, who realized that this form of mass hypnosis, of the madness of crowds, can account for the strange phenomenon of about 20-30% of the population in the western world becoming entranced with the Noble Lies and dominant narrative concerning the safety and effectiveness of the genetic vaccines, and both propagated and enforced by politicians, science bureaucrats, pharmaceutical companies and legacy media.

What one observes with the mass hypnosis is that a large fraction of the population is completely unable to process new scientific data and facts demonstrating that they have been misled about the effectiveness and adverse impacts of mandatory mask use, lockdowns, and genetic vaccines that cause people’s bodies to make large amounts of the biologically active coronavirus Spike protein.

These hypnotized by this process are unable to recognize the lies and misrepresentations they are being bombarded with on a daily basis, and actively attack anyone who has the temerity to share information with them which contradicts the propaganda that they have come to embrace. And for those whose families and social networks have been torn apart by this process, and who find that close relatives and friends have ghosted them because they question the officially endorsed “truth” and are actually following the scientific literature, this can be a source of deep anguish, sorrow, and psychological pain.

It is with those souls in mind that I included a discussion of the mass formation theory of Dr. Mattias Desmet during a recent talk I gave in Tampa, Florida to an audience of about 2,000.  As I looked out into the audience and spoke, I could see the relief on many faces, and even tears running from the eyes of stoic men.

Unknown to me, someone recorded the speech and appended the vocal track to a series of calming images of natural landscapes, producing a video that has gone viral throughout the world.  A link to the video, as well as some notes to clarify and supplement the talk, are appended below. Many have told me that they find it very healing.  I hope it may help you also.
A brief overview of Mass Formation, which was developed by Dr. Mattias Desmet. He is a psychologist and a statistician. He is at the University of Ghent in Belgium.  I think Dr. Mattias is onto something about what is happening and he calls this phenomenon:


So, when he says “mass” formation, you can think of this as equivalent to “crowd” formation. One can think of this as:


The conditions to set up mass formation psychosis include lack of social connectedness and sensemaking as well as large amounts of latent anxiety and passive aggression. When people are inundated with a narrative that presents a plausible "object of anxiety" and strategy for coping with it, then many individuals group together to battle the object with a collective singlemindedness. This allows people to stop focusing on their own problems, avoiding personal mental anguish. Instead, they focus all their thought and energy on this new object.

As mass formation progresses, the group becomes increasingly bonded and connected. Their field of attention is narrowed and they become unable to consider alternative points of view.  Leaders of the movement are revered, unable to do no wrong. 

Left unabated, a society under the spell of mass formation will support a totalitarian governance structure capable of otherwise unthinkable atrocities in order to maintain compliance. A note: mass formation is different from groupthink. There are easy ways to fix group think by just bringing in dissenting voices and making sure you give them platforms.  It isn’t so easy with mass formation.  Even when the narrative falls apart, cracks in the strategy clearly aren’t solving the issue, the hypnotized crowd can’t break free of the narrative.  This is what appears to be happening now with COVID-19.  The solution for those in control of the narrative is to produce bigger and bigger lies to prop up the solution.  Those being controlled by mass formation no longer are able to use reason to break free of the group narrative.

Of course, the obvious example of mass formation is Germany in the 1930s and 40s. How could the German people who were highly educated, very liberal in the classic sense; western thinking people… how could they go so crazy and do what they did to the Jews? How could this happen?
To a civilized people?  A leader of a mass formation movement will use the platform to continue to pump the group with new information to focus on.  In the case of COVID-19, I like to use the term “fear porn.”  Leaders, through mainstream media and government channels continuously feed the “beast” with more messaging that focuses and further hypnotize their adherents.

Studies suggest that mass formation follows a general distribution:

30% are brainwashed, hypnotized, indoctrinated by the group narrative

40% in the middle are persuadable and may follow if no worthy alternative is perceived

30% fight against the narrative.

Those that rebel and fight against the narrative, become the enemy of the brainwashed and a primary target of aggression.

One of the best ways to counter mass formation is for those against the narrative to continue to speak out against it, which serves to help break the hypnosis of some in the brainwashed group as well as persuade the persuadable middle to choose reason over mindlessness.

Dr. Desmet suggests that for something as big as COVID-19, the only way to break the mass formation psychosis is to give the crowd something bigger to focus on.  He believes that totalitarianism maybe that bigger issue.  Of course, after COVID-19, global totalitarianism may be the biggest issue of our time.  

Justice Will Be Served For These Deaths. Share This & Save Lives


Judy was one of the first scientists to speak out on this issue of mass vaccination and she took a lot of heat and still does.  She is fighting for justice and that is what the American people want most.  Everyone will get what they deserve.  

Some citizens proud to have taken part in the vaccination campgain

List of Young Athletes Who Died Suddenly of Cardiac Arrest. Why?

athletes sudden death

No official word on the cause of death for the 33-year-old former All-Pro who retired just 5 months ago.
Demaryius Thomas Dies Suddenly at Age 33? Why? Why? Why? Why?    
If you have been following soccer of futbol in Europe you will know there have been lots of similar deaths. 

Professional and amateur athletics worldwide are seeing an unprecedented spike in deaths of athletes. In fact, the number has climbed so high, Wikipedia has stopped reporting the number of soccer players who have died during play as of October 2021.

If you study the reasons for death amongst athletes, you will see a high occurrence of heart issues and attacks. This finding is consistent with the fact that scientists and doctors have been warning continuously that the mRNA jab is causing heart problems in healthy young boys and men; and that those conditions are 6 times as likely to cause hospitalization than COVID-19.

list athletes died suddenly

Here are more articles highlighting this topic 

"Fact Checking" Facebook Sued by John Stossel for Lies

Surprisingly little attention is being paid to a bombshell admission made by the attorneys representing the corporation formerly known as Facebook, Inc., which has now transitioned into Meta Platforms, Inc.

John Stossel going to have a field day on his social media with this one.

Twitter Poll Shows The Tide Is Turning on Fake News & Boosters

Pfizer Clinical Trail Data Won't Be Released Until 2096. What Are They Hiding?

As attorney Siri writes “this is “Not a typo.” They are demanding 75 years of data secrecy. Yes, the FDA is agreeing to share about 12,000 pages in the first couple of months but thereafter they would release, at a snail’s...

Outrageous Lack of Transparency—Pfizer Now Asks Court for 75 Years to Hide Details of COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Results.

TrialSite has tracked attorney Aaron Siri and his client’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case against Pfizer for full disclosure of clinical trials documentation. Siri shared in a previous post that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked a federal judge to delay the full disclosure of all relevant documentation till 2076—55 years from now! 

Siri, who is a partner with the law firm Siri Glimstad representing the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) countered to the court that Pfizer should disclose the entire batch of documentation within 108 days which just happens to be the amount of time it took for the Gold Standard regulatory agency to review and approve Pfizer’s vaccine. After the court-ordered both parties to submit updated briefs, now in what can only be considered an insult to injury, Pfizer “doubles down.” Meaning the pharmaceutical company now wants to hide the extent of all of the material information till 2096.

Here are some Tweets showing what they are hiding . . .

LAUSD To Lose Court Fight to Impose Vaccine Mandates

LAUSD School District Map

Children’s Health Defense California chapter employed attorney Nicole Pearson to challenge the LA school district’s ability to impose a vaccine mandate for kids.

The papers were filed last week for a preliminary injunction. At Nicole’s request, I was one of about 10 experts who filed an affidavit in support of CHD’s motion.

The hearing was today. The judge walked in with a 12-page proposed order denying CHD’s motion.

Nicole wasn’t going to let that happen. She made a brilliant argument that if the order were to be signed by the judge that every school district in California would be able to set the medical policy for all kids and the State would thus lose control. She also pointed out that schools shouldn’t be allowed to dictate medical policy for kids. If they can do it for vaccines, then they should be able to require birth control so kids don’t get pregnant and miss school, etc., etc.

The judge is now having second thoughts. He didn’t issue his order and is now going back to re-think his position. We are all optimistic he will strike down LAUSD’s ability to set medical policy for kids.

Congratulations Nicole! GREAT JOB.

Could Omicron Be The Cure For Covid? Natural Immunity?

Omicron is spreading quickly but producing no serious symptoms in those who are said to be "infected" with it. It appears that omicron, despite being widely hyped by the scientifically illiterate corporate media, may have finally reached "seasonal flu" status in terms of its relatively mild impact on human health.

And that means omicron might be the cure for covid. It could end this entire pandemic without the need for vaccines, masks, social distancing or lockdowns. By simply allowing omicron to sweep through the human population -- producing almost zero deaths -- the entire world could become immune to covid and we could end all the global madness, including Australia's totalitarian "covid concentration camps" that are making global headlines.

Yesterday I interviewed Steve Kirsch, a highly intelligent, data-driven analyst who has been making huge wave on Substack with his articles on covid vaccines (and their long-term effects on humanity). That full interview will be posted today on my channel at

In that interview, Kirsch dropped a bombshell. He explained that omicron so far appears to be very mild but highly infectious, following a rather typical path of viral host adaptation. As a result, he explained that if a person had to choose which variant to be infected with, they would vastly prefer omicron, since it has so far killed no one (to our knowledge at this point) and yet provokes the body into producing a powerful immune response that confers immunity against all covid variants (including Delta).

Kirsch was right on the money: Omicron is spreading quickly but producing no serious symptoms in those who are said to be “infected” with it. It appears that omicron, despite being widely hyped by the scientifically illiterate corporate media, may have finally reached “seasonal flu” status in terms of its relatively mild impact on human health.

And that means omicron might be the cure for covid. It could end this entire pandemic without the need for vaccines, masks, social distancing or lockdowns. By simply allowing omicron to sweep through the human population — producing almost zero deaths — the entire world could become immune to covid and we could end all the global madness, including Australia’s totalitarian “covid concentration camps” that are making global headlines.

Pfizer would miss out on billions in new variant vaccine revenues, of course, which is why Fauci and the entire criminal cabal of Big Pharma corona con artists will fight against natural immunity in every way possible.

If omicron is the cure, that would explain why governments are cutting off world travel to prevent it from spreading

Does this realization explain why governments of the world are suddenly banning flights from South Africa and cutting off travel? Maybe they don’t want omicron to spread and replace the “delta” variant because delta produces far higher fatalities that feed into the media’s pro-vaccine fear narrative.

If omicron takes over the world, the pandemic is essentially over and they can’t drive people into the depopulation vaccines. Compliance is based on fear, and without the deaths, the fear can’t be maintained.

This brings us to the realization that the vaccine IS the pandemic. When people are vaccinated and injected with spike protein bioweapons — or the mRNA instructions for their bodies to manufacture those spike protein nanoparticles — they often suffer adverse reactions or even death. These deaths are blamed on “covid” when the real culprit is often the vaccines themselves. Without the vaccines, this pandemic would flame out all by itself.

As the American Heart Association’s Circulation journal recently published, mRNA covid vaccines “dramatically increase endothelial inflammatory markers” and, “may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”

Furthermore, the recently released Pfizer postmarketing experience document — just released by the FDA under court order — reveals that both Pfizer and the FDA knew in early 2021 that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was killing people by the thousands, affecting three times more women than men. (See my coverage of this “smoking gun” document here.)

Natural immunity is the only permanent solution to covid, and vaccines simply can’t replace the human immune response

Ultimately, natural immunity is the only real solution to the covid plandemic. Vaccines are proving to be so disastrous that the EU is now recommending booster shots every 3 months… thereby proving that their vaccines stop working in about 3 months. The 3-month schedule will apparently continue indefinitely… or until you’re dead from the spike protein injections ripping your vascular system to shreds.

Covid vaccines don’t stop covid transmission, and they don’t prevent people from becoming infected with covid variants. Right now across the world, most of the people hospitalized with covid infections are vaccinated. Yet the only response from the tone deaf “science” community is to scream, “More vaccines!”

What we really need is more natural immunity, which means we need more exposure to a “mild” version of covid that kills almost no one.

Omicron now appears to be precisely that. It’s the globalists’ worst nightmare: Their bioweapon has adapted to become non-scary and easily beaten without vaccines. It means the Fauci fraud may be approaching its final chapter, and the scourge of covid vaccines and media lies may be coming to an end.

What the world’s leaders should actually be doing right now, in my view, is promoting vitamin D, zinc and other nutritional immune boosters, ending all mask mandates, lockdowns and vaccine mandates, and allowing omicron to invoke natural immunity across the populations of the world. Tear down the covid concentration camps and let the children finally have recess without masks.

We could all emerge from this with new, global immunity against covid. From there, we can begin the process of indicting and arresting all the covid criminals who took part in the covid “scamdemic” and put humanity through sheer hell over the last two years.

Get full details in today’s Situation Update podcast, which also covers mob looting, Italy’s “March of the Vaccine Dead,” and an update on laser cutting for hydroponic grow system.

natural immunity

Still Loaded With Antibodies 1 Year Later After Covid 19 Infection

Labcorp Antibodies Test Results Positive
Why Is Natural Immunity Still Being Ignored By The Corrupt Government & Corporate Media?

Blood test results from Labcorp show an unvaccinated family of four people still have antibodies 1 year later after infection.  Family of people with ages ranging from 12-48 still are loaded with antibodies.  

Can this family get a vaccine mandate exemption?

Here is the language used by the criminals running the CDC.  All eligible people should be vaccinated, including unvaccinated people who have previously been infected and have detectable antibodies.

Numerous immunologic studies (NO STUDIES LINKED?) have consistently shown that vaccination of individuals who were previously infected enhances their immune response, and growing epidemiologic evidence indicates that vaccination following infection further reduces the risk of subsequent infection, including in the setting of increased circulation of more infectious variants.

Risk of an MIS-like illness or the known risks of COVID-19 vaccination such as the rare risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination for people who meet the following criteria:

  1. Clinical recovery has been achieved, including return to normal cardiac function;
  2. It has been ≥90 days since their diagnosis of MIS-C;
  3. They are in an area of high or substantial community transmission of SARS-CoV-2, or otherwise have an increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 exposure and transmission; and
  4. Onset of MIS-C occurred before any COVID-19 vaccination.
People diagnosed with MIS-C or MIS-A after COVID-19 vaccination

In the rare instance of a person developing MIS-C, MIS-A, or a similar clinical illness after receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine, referral to a specialist in infectious diseases, rheumatology, or cardiology should be considered. Because MIS-C and MIS-A are conditions known to occur with SARS-CoV-2 infection, these individuals should be assessed for laboratory evidence of current or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Healthcare and public health professionals should also consider requesting a consultation from the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment COVIDvax project. In addition, all illnesses consistent with MIS-C or MIS-A occurring in persons who received any COVID-19 vaccine should be reported to VAERS.

FDA today: 42% of children 5-11 have natural immunity

42% of children 5-11 have natural immunity

Labcorp Antibodies Test Results Positive

Labcorp Antibodies Test Results Positive

Labcorp Antibodies Test Results Positive

Court Orders FDA To Comply With FOIA Docs Request


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released the first batch of documents related to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine after a federal judge ordered that they must comply with a massive Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that was filed by a government accountability group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.

The esteemed group of more than 30 professors and scientists asked the federal government to share any and all data that factored into the agency’s hasty decision to grant Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine an emergency use authorization (EUA) – which amounts to a trove of over 329,000 documents.

In a shameless effort to bury the information, the FDA challenged the FOIA request in court. After the agency was told that it must turn over the documents, Justice Department lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to allow them an unthinkable 55 years to process the request, saying that they would be able to release just 500 pages a month.

A motion that was also filed by the same group of doctors and scientists is currently pending in federal court that would force the FDA to expedite processing and releasing these documents.

Meanwhile, the FDA still has to comply with the original order to begin turning over documents. Lo and behold, the first release is a bombshell.

According to an official Pfizer document that is titled Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports, in just the first 90 days of the vaccine’s roll out under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were TENS OF THOUSANDS of reported adverse reactions, including OVER 1200 DEATHS.

The report only included adverse events to the vaccine that researchers considered “serious cases,” there were thousands more submissions that were left out of this data.

Any cases deemed “non-serious” would be processed within 90 days, but this report was released before 90 days of Pfizer’s vaccine being available had even passed.

“Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, the MAH has prioritised the processing of serious cases, in order to meet expedited regulatory reporting timelines and ensure these reports are available for signal detection and evaluation activity.

Non-serious cases are processed as soon as possible and no later than 90 days from receipt. Pfizer has also taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports.”

In all, the report states that there were a total of 42,086 case reports of individuals who had an adverse reaction to Pfizer’s vaccine worldwide, with the largest number (13,739) coming from the United States and from the UK (13,404).

According to the documents women (29,914) were over 3x more likely to experience a reaction than men (9182). A total of 1223 individuals had a fatal reaction to the experimental Pfizer vaccine.

How did the FDA not immediately pull the experimental jab out of circulation? Let alone grant multiple extensions of the EUA to Pfizer while working with the fraudulent Biden regime to push a needle into the arm of every single American.

The document also makes it clear that the data only includes “recorded adverse events,” which even the author admits is likely just a portion of the true number of adverse reactions that took place. 

Again, keep in mind, this is within the first 90 days of the Pfizer jab’s availability. 

From the Pfizer document:

“Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown.

Some of the factors that may influence whether an event is reported include: length of time since marketing, market share of the drug, publicity about a drug or an AE, seriousness of the reaction, regulatory actions, awareness by health professionals and consumers of adverse drug event reporting, and litigation.”

Pfizer’s “confidential” Covid-19 vaccine adverse reaction review ends with thousands of conditions that are of “special interest” and could possibly develop after taking their experimental jab. The single-space typed list continues for an astonishing 9 pages.

Yet somehow the paper concludes that the “review of available data” was good enough and demonstrated a “favorable benefit-risk balance” for the rushed vaccine.

What’s the benefit-risk balance on a virus that has a 99.9% recovery rate? The benefit – at least for Pfizer – is clear; It doesn’t matter how many otherwise healthy lives are lost – they are CASHING IN to the tune of $1,000 PER SECOND with a projected $36 BILLION in profit this year from the vaccine alone – it’s criminal. 

Smoking gun confidential Pfizer document exposes FDA criminal cover-up of VACCINE DEATHS… they knew the jab was killing people in early 2021… three times more WOMEN than MEN

The full document can be found here.

The FDA clearly agreed with Pfizer, extending the EUA despite the high number of deaths and serious reactions in the short amount of time Pfizer’s jab had been available.

What else are they hiding?

Omicron Variant Used To Cover Up Effects of Covid Vaccines

Government bureaucrats using the Omicron Variant to disguise the rapid increase in sudden and unexplained cardiac deaths in the vaccinated.

Recently the Botswana Government announced that a new variant of Covid had arisen from the Vaccinated. Read More.

One of the symptoms listed of the new Omicron Variant of Coronavirus; includes the following:

A number of heart-related complications may occur, including heart failure, arrhythmias, heart inflammation, and blood clots. 

This happens to be one of the primary negative effects of the COVID vaccines among men especially; which has led to a 5-fold increase in sudden and unexplained cardiac deaths in FIFA players in 2021. In fact, since December, 183 professional athletes and coaches have suddenly collapsed, 108 dead.

It looks like bureaucrats are already using the Omicron Variant to disguise the rapid increase in sudden and unexplained cardiac deaths in the vaccinated; just as they did with the Delta Variant.

Some athletes have begun to publicly question the mainstream narrative regarding these sudden cardiac events among the vaccinated.

Second US Omicron Case Is Vaccinated Adult Male Whose "Mild Symptoms" Have Fully Resolved

Not Just Players - Premier League Matches Disrupted By Fans Having 'Medical Emergencies' In The Stands

Fact Checking The Fact Checker Lies & Fake News

fact checker lies

Full article comments

One of the downsides of telling the truth in this environment is that it seems everyone and their brother wants to tear all your arguments to shreds.

I could spend full time just refuting all the hit pieces written about the content I’ve produced. Here’s my fact check of the fact-checkers as a repurposed graphic:

Rather than address every point of every fact check, here is a checklist for things that a thorough fact checker should be able to answer, but can’t or won’t.

Note that this is a quick list I put together in about 30 minutes. There are more, but you get the idea:

  1. What is my motivation for suddenly, at age 65, becoming a spreader of misinformation and conspiracy theories? And why did it only happen right after hearing about my friends who had died or been disabled by the COVID vaccines? Do you even know me or have we ever met?

  2. Dr. Toby Rogers compute 117 deaths per kid saved in ages 5 to 11? Do you agree with his analysis? 20,000 people read that article and couldn’t find a hole. So where did he go wrong and how can be sure you got it right and he got it wrong?

  3. If this is all done out of Kirsch's ego, then how is it that 30 other scientists, statisticians, and doctors all agree with him? Why did all of these people suddenly become conspiracy theorists? What’s their motivation for the fraud and deception?

  4. If the vaccines are safe, how come Alex Berenson also thinks the vaccines are unsafe? Is he also a crackpot? Isn’t it unfair just to attack Kirsch? Berenson and Kirsch hardly ever talk, yet came to the same conclusion. What about Del Bigtree? He found the same thing. In fact, Bigtree’s attorney calculated a VAERS URF of 50 well before Kirsch did. So why pick on Kirsch?

  5. If the fact checker uses a pseudonym, why can’t you tell us what your name is?  Are you going to tell us who funded you to do the hit piece?

  6. Will you debate us in a recorded zoom call where you can answer all our questions? We are eager to find out how we were fooled by all this data.

  7. If the vax is so safe, why are there so many death entries in VAERS this year?

  8. If you think there is simply “over-reporting” in VAERS this year what is your actual evidence of that? All the people we talked to are reporting more events because there are more events happening. In fact, most people report that there are at least 100X more events this year than previous years. So it seems like VAERS is actually under-reported this year, and not over-reported, don’t you think?

  9. There are 5,288 symptoms that haven’t been reported for ANY vaccine in the last 5 years that are being reported for the first time in these vaccines. Why?

  10. Why are there more adverse event reports this year than for every vaccine in the last 30 years combined?

  11. If the URF isn't 41, what is the true URF and did you calculate it using the CDC-approved methodology like we did? (see The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome).

  12. If we got it wrong, then tell us: How many people do you estimate have been killed by the COVID vaccines and how do you know?

  13. One of the ways we computed the number of deaths from the vaccine was using independent polling company. How was that gamed?

  14. Why are athletes dropping by a 60X rate after the vax rollout?

  15. How did Ernest Ramirez's son die?

  16. How do you explain the causes of death of the 14 cases the CDC examined? 5 of them died from cardiac arrest!

  17. How does he explain the results of Peter Schirmacher?

  18. Why did Taiwan report more deaths from the vaccine than from COVID?

  19. Why is the line slope going the wrong way in the Harvard study?

  20. How do you explain that the biodistribution showing accumulation in the ovaries correlate with the high numbers of VAERS symptoms for menstrual problems many with huge elevations compared to baseline (previous vaccines).

  21. Why are cardiologists reporting highly elevated # of cases of heart disease in kids after the vax rolled out?

  22. Why is the cardio testing lab at UCSF now filled with kids 7 to 10 only AFTER the vaccines rolled out for that age range?

  23. Why is a top California neurologist needing to report 2,000 VAERS events this year when in the last 11 years she's never need to report a single adverse event?

  24. How do we explain the families where 3 relatives, all previously healthy, die within days after the COVID shot?

  25. How do we explain Gavin Newsom being diagnosed with GBS within days after his booster? Isn’t it perfectly safe?

  26. How did 2 cricket players recently vaccinated drop on the field within 10 minutes of each other? Bad luck?

  27. Why does the CDC *REFUSE* to calculate and use the proper URF for VAERS when interpreting the safety data? Pfizer PROVED that VAERS is 5X underreported for myocarditis, and the CDC will not even acknowledge that? John Su is using a URF of 1. That is clearly false and misleading. Why are you not going after him? That is truly evil and corrupt. I’m not the bad guy here. This was in plain sight of the public (Pfizer slide with the Optum data (see my article about this).

  28. How come undertakers report a huge increase in business right after the vaccines rolled out?

  29. Why aren't the nursing homes disputing Abrien Aguirre's account that there were 10 times as many deaths from the vaccines than from COVID?

  30. How come the CDC hasn't ascribed even a single death from the vaccines in light of Schirmacher's study? That’s inexplicable isn’t it?

  31. Why are there so many vaccine injured people that Facebook had to remove groups of 250,000 and more (multiple times).

  32. Why aren't the vaccine injured getting any press?

  33. Why did YouTube censor Dr. Peter Doshi's testimony? UCSF Professor Aditi Bhargava spoke as well and was censored. Why? Are you speaking out about that?

  34. How come Jessica Rose’s myocarditis paper was pulled by the publisher? Are you making a stink about the corruption of science here? Or are you just trying to discredit me?

  35. What about Maddie de Garay? Why didn't the FDA, CDC, or Pfizer ever investigate? Why did Janet Woodcock assure me they would and then did nothing? Why didn't they report the truth and stop the trial on the permanent paralysis. Her result aligns PERFECTLY with the mechanism of action of the drug? How can they have eliminated the vax as the cause without ever talking to her? They are supposed to assume it is the vax until they can show otherwise.

  36. What about the 5X exclusions (vs placebo group) in the Pfizer trial? That can't be by chance can it?

  37. How come there were so few all-cause deaths in the Pfizer study? It was supposed to be a representative group! There should be been around 110 deaths in each group, right?

  38. How come Pfizer 6 months study shows more all cause deaths in the treatment group in than in the placebo group? Where is the PROOF that the vaccines are saving lives? Whoops!!!! No proof at all of a single life saved. As a fact checker, why aren’t you calling that out? Instead you are targetting me. Hmmmm.

  39. Why were there 4X as many cardiac arrests in the vax group vs. placebo in the Pfizer Phase 3 study (6 month)? Seems pretty high. It wasn’t just bad luck since we see all these athletes in plain sight dropping. So isn’t it more likely than not this is real?

  40. Aren’t you concerned that the trials going forward are too underpowered to resolve any of these questions?

  41. Wasn’t there gaming in the Pfizer Phase 3 trials on adverse event reporting where people found it difficult/impossible to report AEs.

  42. Despite the gaming of the AE reports, aren’t you alarmed at the statistically significant large increase in overall morbidity in all of the COVID vaccine trials (the paper US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good… by J. Bart Classen, MD).

  43. How come the NIH and WHO did absolutely nothing when the fluvoxamine Phase 3 trial was published in Lancet? They didn't even note it in the guidelines. Did you protest that? Why not? It’s December 2, 2021 and the fluvoxamine recommendation was Last Updated: April 23, 2021. The Lancet article was widely covered by all major media, but the NIH did nothing. How do you explain that? Why aren’t you spending your valuable time focusing on that?

  44. How come nobody can cite a SINGLE RCT that shows that masks work against COVID?

  45. How come Professor Jeffrey Morris changed the topic whenever we tried to show him that the symptoms in VAERS were dose dependent? (Note: dose dependency is one of the most impressive indicators of causality, but we use all Bradford-Hill criteria to assess causality).

  46. Dr. Steven A. Anderson of the FDA is supposed to be monitoring the VAERS data like a hawk. We have people highly qualified to who have spent months analyzing the VAERS data. Why does Dr. Anderson refuse to meet with us?

  47. How come the FDA and CDC outside committee members all turned down a $1M research grant just to talk to us for a few hours and answer questions? What are they afraid of?

  48. If the CDC and FDA members are independent, why did one of them admit in a private conversation that if they didn’t vote the way the FDA /CDC wanted they would be kicked off the committee like Martin Kulldorff.

  49. If the vaccines are so safe, then why did CDC insiders tip off a friend of mine in January not to get the vaccines?

  50. If the excess deaths in VAERS was not caused by the vaccine, then what is causing it and why isn’t the CDC investigating? These causes of death were not normal.

  51. While it is amusing for people to refer to the Mclachlan VAERS study and argue that all the deaths were normal, that’s simply not what the study said. Shall we go through all 250 cases one by one? The paper said “Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.” So it is interesting that some people can definitively state that the vaccine didn’t cause their death. Are these fact checkers willing to go through the cases one by one with Scott and our team and show us all how we got it wrong?

When you find a “fact check” that addresses those 51 questions, that would be great because I have another 130 questions just like those which I’d love to hear them explain as well.

Debunking Steve Kirsch’s latest claims about covid vaccine deaths

Here is the Medium article. Whoever wrote this “fact check” clearly spent a lot of time putting together his case. Basically, this nameless, faceless person claims that Crawford cherry picked data and that the excess death data doesn’t line up with a deadly vaccine. I just learned about this on Dec 1 at 11pm.

The author says my motivation is ego and fame. Wow. This shows you the quality of his work. Is the author willing to challenge my team in a recorded debate? I seriously doubt it. But I’ve got an open invitation to do just that! Let’s find the truth. We are not afraid of a challenge. Is he? If you are “The Gift of Fire,” then please respond in the comments.

He asks in his title: “What motivates a tech millionaire to fight against covid vaccines?” I’d have a lot more respect for him if was able to get that simple question right. But he can’t even get that one right. Everyone who knows me and works with me will tell you the answer: “Mr. Kirsch just wants to save lives.” I would argue if he can’t get something simple like that out, that we should have a lot less confidence in anything else he says.

So rather than spend our time debunking his debunk, I want to issue a challenge to our anonymous “do gooder.” We’ll address all of your points in your article, if you address all the points above all in a LIVE RECORDED zoom call where we can set the record straight.

How about it?

Healthfeedback fact check

Today, for example, someone sent me this link from the “experts” at that fact checked two statements that they claim that I made:

  1. "the ovaries get the highest concentration of [lipid nanoparticles from RNA vaccines]. This turns the ovaries into a very large manufacturing plant to turn out toxic spike protein"

  2. "FDA experts reveal the Covid-19 Vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every 1 life they save"

The short story is the first statement was taken completely out of context and was referring to a chart that was limited to showing the body parts where we did not expect to see any lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivered. The second was a quote from The Expose that I never claimed. It was their mistake, not mine.

If we address the “context problem” of the first one and they mistake by The Expose in the second one, we are left with:

  1. When we look at areas of the body where we didn’t expect to see the LNPs, the ovaries has the highest accumulation.

  2. The VAERS data shows that the vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every life that they might save. It’s not just me that says that. The Walach and Kostoff papers, published in peer reviewed medical journals, say the same thing.

The facts supporting both of these statements are pretty straightforward.

Lawsuit LA Unified School District Over Mandates

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is bringing against the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD).

Yes, this is the same school district that is educating you on the benefits of vaccination WITHOUT telling you ANYTHING about the risks. In short, they are the ones giving you a one-sided view of the argument.

Also contributing affidavits in opposition of their mandate are:

Dr. Ledbetter

Dr. Fleming

Dr. Barke

Brian Isley

Dr. Tracy Darling

Dr. Jessica Rose

Nurse Tawny B.

Nurse Lexi T.

Nurse Devin T. 

Nurse Jackie - TBD, 

Ryan Cole - TBD

Dr. Aaron Kheriarty (UCI) -TBD

I’ve read the declarations from LAUSD. Two were submitted.

David Baca said what the policy was (get vaccinated or don’t participate on campus) but didn’t opine on the cost-benefit analysis.

Smita Malhotra, MD says everyone must wear masks because it is consistent with what the CDC says to do. And that all their policies are consistent with CDC guidelines. Because the FDA has “determined that the vaccines benefits outweigh the risks,” it must be safe. In short, we are doing this because we follow their guidance without asking any questions. We don’t do any checks on the science. A credible risk-benefit analysis from these agencies is not required. Who needs that when you have their assurances?

So there you go. Blind trust. We can safely ignore what the science and evidence say. No need to look at the data at all!

We have the facts and evidence on our side. They have the infallibility of the FDA and CDC on their side.

What matters now is what the court decides.

We’ll find out when the decision pops out around December 8. Stay tuned.

Nicole C. Pearson [SBN 265350]

Jessica R.  Barsotti [SBN 209557]

Rita Barnett-Rose [SBN 195801]


3421 Via Oporto, Ste. 201

Newport Beach, CA 92663

Telephone: (424) 272-5526;; 




CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE-CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, on its own and on behalf of its members, and PROTECTION OF THE EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS OF KIDS (P.E.R.K.), a California 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of its members, 



LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a local educational agency and school district for the County of Los Angeles; MEGAN REILLY, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Los Angeles Unified School District; GEORGE MCKENNA, in his official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; MONICA GARCIA, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; SCOTT SCHMERELSON in his official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; NICK MELVOIN, in his official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; JACKIE GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; KELLY GONEZ, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; TANYA ORTIZ FRANKLIN, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; Respondents, 


Case No.:  21STCP03429


Date:                     December 8, 2021

Time:                    9:30 a.m.

Dept.:                    86

Complaint Filed:  October 13, 2021

Trial Date:            Not yet set


I, STEVEN T. KIRSCH, declare as follows:

1. I am an adult over 18 years of age and have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein this declaration, which are offered in support of the Reply in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction of Petitioners CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE – CA CHAPTER (“CHD”), and PROTECTION OF THE EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS OF KIDS (“PERK”) (hereinafter collectively “Petitioners”).  If called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify under oath to the facts stated herein.


2. I attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) from 1974 to 1980 and earned a SB/SM from MIT. The main computer science auditorium at MIT is named after me.

3. I am a retired high technology executive, but, prior to my retirement, founded seven (7) high technology companies, two with billion-dollar market caps. 

4. I am independently wealthy. I have no conflicts of interest. My sole motivation is to save lives. Making a positive difference in the lives of others gives me a sense of purpose and fulfills me. I have received many awards for my philanthropy over the past 20 years, the most notable being awarded the recipient of a “National Caring Award” from the Caring Institute in 2003. Senator Hilary Clinton presented me with the award in Washington DC in front of a very large audience. 

5. In March of 2020, I was working as Chief Executive Officer at a digital money startup company, M10, when COVID impacted our operations.

6. In April 2020, I decided to put my company on hold to do things that could save lives. I donated $1M to start the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund. I raised another $5M and we funded research into early treatments for COVID. 

7. The COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund funded fluvoxamine, an inexpensive, safe drug with virtually no side effects at the effective dose that can reduce the death rate from COVID by 12 times making it far more effective than any vaccine (e.g., the Pfizer vaccine only had only a 2X reduction in mortality in the clinical trials). (See 60 Minutes: Funding a Possible Early Treatment for COVID-19 in a 40-year-old Antidepressant, aired on March 7, 2021). 


8. On March 29, 2021, I completed my second dose of Moderna. At the time, I was convinced by government assurances that the vaccines were safe and effective. I had no reason at all to question the experts. I had always complied with advice from the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”).

9. In early May, 2021, I began hearing stories from my friends who related stories of either themselves or loved ones who died or became permanently disabled shortly after being vaccinated. All of these cases were statistically unlikely if the government assurances of safety were true. However, I knew my friends weren’t lying, so that left only two possibilities: 1) the government was lying or 2) I am a very unlucky person. I put my job on hold and devoted full time to uncovering which option was more likely.


10. By May 25, 2021, it was more than clear to me what was going on, so I wrote a 287-page document detailing what I had learned on TrialSiteNews entitled “Should you get vaccinated?” That article had over 1 million views and over 18,000 “likes.” That is pretty amazing for a 287-page article! My article laid out the evidence behind my assertion that these COVID vaccines were more deadly than any vaccine in human history and should be immediately halted. 

11. Specifically, I found that the vaccine doesn’t stay in your arm like most vaccines, but gets delivered everywhere in your body, including your brain, heart, lung, and reproductive organs. Secondly, the payload delivered by the vaccine causes cells to express a protein which is cytotoxic causes inflammation and blood clots, which leads to a wide range of neurological, cardiovascular, immunological, and reproductive symptoms. Ultimately, I found that COVID-19 vaccines kill more people than they save. 

12. I also verified with a local neurologist who told me that in her 11 year in her current practice, her office has never had to make a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) report. This year, they need to make 2,000 VAERS reports and they have 20,000 patients. This is exceptional. It is clear, irrefutable evidence that these vaccines are thousands of times more dangerous than any vaccine that has been used in the last 10 years.

13. After publication of my article, for the very first time in my life, I was labelled as a spreader of misinformation and people told me that they no longer would speak to me. When I asked if there was anything wrong with my logic, nobody could point out a flaw in what I wrote. They said I was an evil person for opposing the supposedly “safe and effective” vaccines.


14. The conclusions of my original article that the COVID-19 vaccines kill more people than they save were subsequently confirmed by two papers published in peer-reviewed medical journals: one “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?” by Ronald Kostoff et al.  and “The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations: Should We Rethink the Policy?” by Harald Walach et al. , both published in August 2021.

15. The conclusions of my original article that vaccines kill more people than they save were also subsequently confirmed by official government data: the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) stunning admission that in the clinical trials for Pfizer, more people died who got the vaccine than who got the placebo. Let me repeat that: The FDA admitted that vaccine killed more people than it saved. 

16. On page 23 of the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action submitted by Dr. Ramchandra Naik on May 18, 2021, it says “From Dose 1 through the March 13, 2021 data cutoff date, there were a total of 38 deaths, 21 in the COMIRNATY group and 17 in the placebo group.”  Since there were just two COVID deaths in the placebo group and 1 COVID death in the vaccine group, a net total of 1 death from COVID was saved by the vaccine. However, when all causes of death were considered, there were 4 net deaths (21-17). If there is 1 life saved, this means than 5 people died (since 1-5 = -4). In short, 5 people

lost their lives, one person was saved, resulting in a net loss of 4 people. Another way to look at this is that 5 times as many people lost their lives from all-cause mortality due to the vaccine as compared to the number who were saved from dying from COVID. 

17. The bottom line is that Pfizer’s own clinical trial showed no evidence whatsoever that the vaccine was saving lives overall. In fact, it showed the reverse: the vaccine kills around 5 people (who die from the vaccine) for every 1 person saved from COVID. 

18. The Pfizer trial also showed that for every 22,000 fully-vaccinated people, we would save a total of approximately 1 life from COVID. This means with 220M vaccinated people, we’d save only 10,000 lives from death from COVID, but this would be at a cost of at least 50,000 lives resulting in a net loss of 40,0000 lives after 220M full vaccinations. 

19. In short, the vaccines are nonsensical. They do appear to save people from dying from COVID, however, at the cost of killing them from cardiac, neurologic, or immunologic causes caused by the vaccine itself. In short, the cure is worse than the disease. 

20. The CDC is focusing the public’s attention exclusively on lives saved “from Covid” and completely ignoring the people killed and disabled from the vaccines.

21. Because the numbers in the Pfizer clinical trial were small and not statistically significant, they needed to be validated using larger sample sizes – real-world data – so I sought out assistance from researchers from all over the world and assembled 8 different methods and different data sources. Through this research we identified at least 150,000 excess deaths in the US were caused by the vaccine. 

22. The results showed that we killed a minimum of 150,000 from the vaccine itself, but we saved 10,000 people from dying from COVID. This is an even worse tradeoff than the 5 to 1 calculated from the Pfizer clinical trial data. This is a 15 to 1 ratio. The detailed calculations and methodology are laid out in my article, “Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America.”  These are only estimates, but these are conservative estimates, since I used the lowest death estimate of the 8 methods I used (the highest death estimates were over 300,000 people).

23. Just because the vaccine is deadly overall, it still might have a positive risk-benefit for certain age groups. However, because there was no risk-benefit analysis by age performed by the CDC (and still isn’t), I did the calculations myself, being very conservative in my calculations (e.g., assume the vaccine saves 100% of all COVID deaths). What I determined is that, even if the vaccine was 100% effective, is has a negative benefit for every age group and the younger you are, the worse it was. 

24. For example, for very old people, we would kill approximately 2 people from all-cause mortality causes to save 1 person from dying from COVID. For 20-year-olds, the number was more than 6 people killed by the vaccine for every 1 person saved. At the time I did the calculation, data for younger people wasn’t available (since they hadn’t been vaccinated yet), but the trend was extremely clear: the younger you are, the more nonsensical vaccination was. 

25. The detailed calculations are set out in my article, Vaccine risk benefit by age, and the table by age is on page 11 :

Computing the final V:C ratio 

So here is our final result in one table that shows that the vaccines don’t make sense for any age group. The V:C ratio should be .1 or lower to make sense. 

Age range V C V:C 

20-30 67 11 6.09 

30-40 120 31 3.87 

40-50 209 76 2.75 

50-60 436 185 2.36 

60-70 1029 450 2.29 

70-80 2133 1133 1.88 

80+ 6266 3458 20.81

26. Although my work has not been peer-reviewed or published in a medical journal, the results are consistent with two papers published in peer-reviewed medical journals showing the same results: the vaccines kill more people than they save, they don’t make sense for any age group, and the younger you are, the more pronounced the harm (Kostoff and Walach papers previously mentioned).


27. I have over 100,000 followers on social media (Twitter, Gab, and Substack) and my analyses have attracted worldwide attention. Despite this, to date, there is not an alternative estimate that I am aware of that is more credible than what I have developed. If there was, I would have adopted it. I am more interested in truthful information being spread than being right. I am happy to be proven wrong. 

28. I also publicly offered a $1M reward to any researcher who could find an error in one of the 8 methods I used to determine the 150,000 deaths caused by the vaccine that would significantly change the results. No one has come forward showing an error. 


29. The most important conclusion from my work establishing that over 150,000 people have been killed by the COVID-19 vaccines means that the COVID-19 vaccines are more deadly than any vaccine in human history. 

30. The normal “stopping condition” of a vaccine is around 50 deaths. For example, in 1976, we stopped the H1N1 vaccine after just 35 deaths (see swine.flu.1976/index.html). These vaccines should have been stopped for all ages in January 2021. However, the FDA has not set a stopping condition for the vaccines. 

31. I am friends with FDA acting commissioner Janet Woodcock and she refused to answer the stopping condition question. 

32. I don’t know of anyone who knows what the stopping condition for the COVID-19 vaccines is. This is unheard of for a clinical trial. A clinical trial without a stopping condition would never be approved by the institutional review board (IRB). Before the COVID vaccines, this was unheard of.  

33. The second most important conclusion from my work establishing that over 150,000 people have been killed by the COVID-19 vaccines is that, because the vaccine kills more people than it saves for every age group, it is nonsensical to vaccinate kids because you are much more likely to kill the child than to save his life. 

34. A careful risk-benefit analysis for children 5 to 11 was done by Dr. Toby Rogers who found that we will kill an estimated 117 kids from the vaccine for every child we save from a COVID death. (See “What is the Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNTV) to prevent a single COVID-19 fatality in kids 5 to 11 based on the Pfizer EUA application?” published October 31, 2021.  I have read his analysis and are not aware of any flaws. He used the best data from all sources for all of the values. (Ibid.) I believe it would be hard for anyone to dispute it. Over 20,000 people have viewed his analysis and there has been only praise in the comments that were posted. That is the ultimate peer review.


35. Early treatments are extremely effective against COVID. Nobody has to lose their life from COVID if they are treated early. Uttar Pradesh in India uses early treatments, not vaccination. Their COVID death rate is now nearly zero. Uttar Pradesh’s population is 204 million, which is just 1/3 smaller than the United States’ population of 329M. Here is the most current data from Johns Hopkins University : 

36. There are people inside the CDC that know all of this is happening, but they are told that if they speak out, they will be fired. I know this because I have spoken to a trusted source who explained to me that that is how he knew to avoid taking the COVID vaccines in January.

37. I have made multiple offers to the CDC and FDA to discuss my findings, but they refuse to have a meeting to discuss any of the results from the team of 29 experts that I collaborate with. 

38. I attempted to get the attention of the members of the outside committees of the FDA and CDC by offering any of these members $1M just to have a recorded, on-the-record discussion of my results for a few hours. If I was wrong, they could correct our errors – this would significantly reduce vaccine hesitancy – no member was interested in my offer.



39. No one in the world can produce any evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines reduce all-cause mortality (death) or morbidity (disability). In fact, all the evidence I am aware of shows the reverse. 

40. In US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity,” published August 25, 2021, the peer-reviewed medical article points out the statistically significant rise in all-cause morbidity for all vaccines. 

41. The CDC examined the cause(s) of death of 14 children who died shortly after vaccination and were reported in the VAERS.  In all cases, the causes of death were consistent with the causes of death elevated by the COVID vaccine, including pulmonary embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, suicide, and cardiac arrest. The causes of deaths of these children were not consistent with “natural causes” of death. Despite this, the CDC stated the cause of death with absolutely no commentary whatsoever regarding possible vaccine injury, and changed the topic. (Ibid.)

42. We would typically expect only 1.6 deaths in that age group to be reported in VAERS and we got 14, confirming my 12 “excess deaths” conclusion. The 1.6 was derived using VAERS queries over the period from 2015 to 2019 looking at deaths in that age range.

43. The VAERS database is approximately 41 times under-reported according to the CDC’s own methodology,  so the 12 excess deaths actually represent 492 child deaths that were excess and caused by the vaccine. 

44. The vaccines also are linked to prion diseases, a family of rare progressive neurodegenerative disorders that affect both humans and animals, that are distinguished by long incubation periods, neuronal loss, and a failure to induce inflammatory response.  Once prion disease starts in the brain, it is not treatable and always leads to death. 100% of the time. No exceptions.  

45. Finally, these vaccines are based on the original “wild type” virus. It is unknown how effective these vaccines will be against the new Omicron or any other variant, especially in kids where we do not even have data regarding vaccine efficacy from the original vaccines. 

46. Based upon my analysis, research, and understanding of the data described in greater detail herein, above, mandating a vaccine for kids for an unknown risk that kills 117 kids within 6 weeks of vaccination, and/or causes brain damages in order to save 1 COVID life is nonsensical, unethical, and immoral. If these vaccine mandates are not halted immediately, kids will unnecessarily lose their lives. That is irreparable harm.

47. Since we couldn’t cost-benefit justify vaccination with the current variants, it will be even harder to conduct with respect to the newest variants, which appear to be very different from the original wild-type variant. Furthermore, Omicron is rapidly spreading and yet very mild, making vaccination even more unnecessary. 


48. There are clear, significant dangers and a dubious benefit to vaccines, generally but especially now due to Omicron, and especially of children. COVID-19 vaccination clearly is killing people, and administering a vaccine designed for the “wild type” variant against what will soon be a pandemic of Omicron without clear scientific proof in double blind randomized trials of a positive all-cause mortality benefit is unethical. It is experimenting on our kids. 

49. The failure to disclose the risks of adverse events (including death) violates California Health and Safety Codes, Federal laws against human experimentation and relating to emergency use authorizations, and the Nuremberg Code, among other things. 

50. The mandated vaccination of our children is reprehensible and should be halted immediately.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on this 1st day of December, 2021. 



Popular Posts (Last 7 Days)


5G Activist ADE Advertising Air Quality Airlines Alchohol Alex Berenson Allergic Angry Moms Antibody Antitrust Apple Apps Arizona Aspirin Astra Zeneca Australia Bankruptcy Banks Banned Bars BBB Beaches Bell's Palsy Ben Shapiro Biden Big Pharma Big Tech Bill Gates BioNTech BitChute Black Rock Blackmail Blood Clots Booster Brave Brownstone Institute Bryan Ardis Business California Canada Cancer Candace Owens Cares Act CDC Censorship Chart ChatGPT Chicago Children China Class Action Clinical Trials Closures CNN Comirnaty Conspiracy Contact Tracing Corruption Cough COVAX Cover Up Crimes Against Humanity Cult Cuomo Dan Bongino DARPA Data David Martin Deaths DeSantis Diabetes Died Suddenly Disinformation Doctor Reiner Doctors DOJ Dominion Dr Michael Yeadon Dr Reiner Dr Shiva Dr Zelenko Drugs Durability DWAC ECDC Education Election Elon Musk Email Enforcement Europe Exemptions Extortion Facebook Fact Checkers Fake Laws Fake News Fake Tests Fake Vaccine False Positive Famotidine Fauci FBI FDA Fear Mongering Federal Reserve Feds Fines Florida Flu Flu Shots Fluvoxamine Fox France Fraud Free Speech Freedom FTC Gain of Function Research Gavin Newsom Geert Vanden Bossche Genome George Soros Germany Glenn Beck Globalism Google Government Guillain-Barré Halloween Harvard Health Health Department Healthcare Heart Herd Immunity Hero HHS Hospitals How To Humor Hydroxychloroquine Hypocrisy Immune System India Inflamation Injured Insurance Investment IRS Israel Italy Ivermectin J&J Japan Jeff Bezos Jim Jordan Jobs Joe Rogan Judy Mikovits LA County Larry Elder Lawsuits Leadership Let Them Breathe Lies Loans Local Laws Lockdown Long Covid Los Angeles Mandates Map Masks Mass Hypnosis Media Medicaid Melatonin Mental Health Michigan Microsoft Minnesota Moderna Money Montana mRNA Mutation Myocarditis Nanoscience Nashville Natural Immunity NBA New Jersey New Media New York New Zealand Nextstrain NFL NIH Nursing Homes NY NY Post Ohio Omicron Omricon Opinion Opposing View Oppression Outdoors Parks Passport Patents PCR Pennsylvania Pericarditis Peter McCullough Pfizer Phishing Physicians Declaration Placebo Plandemic Pneumonia Police Politics Poll Pollution PPP Prevention Pro Choice Project Veritas Protest Racism Rand Paul Real Estate Refuse Regeneron Relief Checks Remdesirvir Restaurants Restraining Order Robert Kennedy Robert Malone Ron Johnson Rudy Giuliani Rumble Russia Safegraph SBA Scams Schools Science Scott Gottlieb Senate Seniors Side Effects Sinus Social Distancing South Korea Spain Sports Stadiums Stakeholder Capitalism Stay at Home Sterilization Steve Kirsch Study Substance Abuse Surveillance Sweden Swine Flu Symptoms T Cells Taxes Teachers Technology Teslaphoresis Testing Texas Tips Tom Cotton Tony Bobulinski Transmission Treatment Tribunals Trojan Horse Trump TruthSocial Tucker Carlson Twitter Tyranny UK Unemployment United Nations Unity Project Vaccine VAERS Video Vietnam Vitamin D War Warren Buffett Washington WEF Whistleblower WHO Wisconsin Women Workers Comp Wuhan Zinc