Showing posts with label Steve Kirsch. Show all posts

Steve Kirsch's Slide Deck - "What the data tells us"

A 52-slide deck presented at the FLCCC conference in Florida on Oct 15, 2022 summarizing some of the most important statistics for the vaccines on safety and efficacy. It got a standing ovation.

Sign Petition FDA Needs To Investigate Pfizer's Clinical Trial Fraud Allegations

Should the FDA investigate Pfizer's clinical trial fraud allegations? Or look the other way?

Could Omicron Be The Cure For Covid? Natural Immunity?

Omicron is spreading quickly but producing no serious symptoms in those who are said to be "infected" with it. It appears that omicron, despite being widely hyped by the scientifically illiterate corporate media, may have finally reached "seasonal flu" status in terms of its relatively mild impact on human health.

And that means omicron might be the cure for covid. It could end this entire pandemic without the need for vaccines, masks, social distancing or lockdowns. By simply allowing omicron to sweep through the human population -- producing almost zero deaths -- the entire world could become immune to covid and we could end all the global madness, including Australia's totalitarian "covid concentration camps" that are making global headlines.

Yesterday I interviewed Steve Kirsch, a highly intelligent, data-driven analyst who has been making huge wave on Substack with his articles on covid vaccines (and their long-term effects on humanity). That full interview will be posted today on my channel at Brighteon.com.

In that interview, Kirsch dropped a bombshell. He explained that omicron so far appears to be very mild but highly infectious, following a rather typical path of viral host adaptation. As a result, he explained that if a person had to choose which variant to be infected with, they would vastly prefer omicron, since it has so far killed no one (to our knowledge at this point) and yet provokes the body into producing a powerful immune response that confers immunity against all covid variants (including Delta).

Kirsch was right on the money: Omicron is spreading quickly but producing no serious symptoms in those who are said to be “infected” with it. It appears that omicron, despite being widely hyped by the scientifically illiterate corporate media, may have finally reached “seasonal flu” status in terms of its relatively mild impact on human health.

And that means omicron might be the cure for covid. It could end this entire pandemic without the need for vaccines, masks, social distancing or lockdowns. By simply allowing omicron to sweep through the human population — producing almost zero deaths — the entire world could become immune to covid and we could end all the global madness, including Australia’s totalitarian “covid concentration camps” that are making global headlines.

Pfizer would miss out on billions in new variant vaccine revenues, of course, which is why Fauci and the entire criminal cabal of Big Pharma corona con artists will fight against natural immunity in every way possible.

If omicron is the cure, that would explain why governments are cutting off world travel to prevent it from spreading

Does this realization explain why governments of the world are suddenly banning flights from South Africa and cutting off travel? Maybe they don’t want omicron to spread and replace the “delta” variant because delta produces far higher fatalities that feed into the media’s pro-vaccine fear narrative.

If omicron takes over the world, the pandemic is essentially over and they can’t drive people into the depopulation vaccines. Compliance is based on fear, and without the deaths, the fear can’t be maintained.

This brings us to the realization that the vaccine IS the pandemic. When people are vaccinated and injected with spike protein bioweapons — or the mRNA instructions for their bodies to manufacture those spike protein nanoparticles — they often suffer adverse reactions or even death. These deaths are blamed on “covid” when the real culprit is often the vaccines themselves. Without the vaccines, this pandemic would flame out all by itself.

As the American Heart Association’s Circulation journal recently published, mRNA covid vaccines “dramatically increase endothelial inflammatory markers” and, “may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”

Furthermore, the recently released Pfizer postmarketing experience document — just released by the FDA under court order — reveals that both Pfizer and the FDA knew in early 2021 that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was killing people by the thousands, affecting three times more women than men. (See my coverage of this “smoking gun” document here.)

Natural immunity is the only permanent solution to covid, and vaccines simply can’t replace the human immune response

Ultimately, natural immunity is the only real solution to the covid plandemic. Vaccines are proving to be so disastrous that the EU is now recommending booster shots every 3 months… thereby proving that their vaccines stop working in about 3 months. The 3-month schedule will apparently continue indefinitely… or until you’re dead from the spike protein injections ripping your vascular system to shreds.

Covid vaccines don’t stop covid transmission, and they don’t prevent people from becoming infected with covid variants. Right now across the world, most of the people hospitalized with covid infections are vaccinated. Yet the only response from the tone deaf “science” community is to scream, “More vaccines!”

What we really need is more natural immunity, which means we need more exposure to a “mild” version of covid that kills almost no one.

Omicron now appears to be precisely that. It’s the globalists’ worst nightmare: Their bioweapon has adapted to become non-scary and easily beaten without vaccines. It means the Fauci fraud may be approaching its final chapter, and the scourge of covid vaccines and media lies may be coming to an end.

What the world’s leaders should actually be doing right now, in my view, is promoting vitamin D, zinc and other nutritional immune boosters, ending all mask mandates, lockdowns and vaccine mandates, and allowing omicron to invoke natural immunity across the populations of the world. Tear down the covid concentration camps and let the children finally have recess without masks.

We could all emerge from this with new, global immunity against covid. From there, we can begin the process of indicting and arresting all the covid criminals who took part in the covid “scamdemic” and put humanity through sheer hell over the last two years.

Get full details in today’s Situation Update podcast, which also covers mob looting, Italy’s “March of the Vaccine Dead,” and an update on laser cutting for hydroponic grow system.

Fact Checking The Fact Checker Lies & Fake News

Full article comments.

One of the downsides of telling the truth in this environment is that it seems everyone and their brother wants to tear all your arguments to shreds.

I could spend full time just refuting all the hit pieces written about the content I’ve produced. Here’s my fact check of the fact-checkers as a repurposed graphic:

Rather than address every point of every fact check, here is a checklist for things that a thorough fact checker should be able to answer, but can’t or won’t.

Note that this is a quick list I put together in about 30 minutes. There are more, but you get the idea:

What is my motivation for suddenly, at age 65, becoming a spreader of misinformation and conspiracy theories? And why did it only happen right after hearing about my friends who had died or been disabled by the COVID vaccines? Do you even know me or have we ever met?
Dr. Toby Rogers computed 117 deaths per kid saved in ages 5 to 11? Do you agree with his analysis? 20,000 people read that article and couldn’t find a hole. So where did he go wrong and how can be sure you got it right and he got it wrong?
If this is all done out of Kirsch's ego, then how is it that 30 other scientists, statisticians, and doctors all agree with him? Why did all of these people suddenly become conspiracy theorists? What’s their motivation for the fraud and deception?
If the vaccines are safe, how come Alex Berenson also thinks the vaccines are unsafe? Is he also a crackpot? Isn’t it unfair just to attack Kirsch? Berenson and Kirsch hardly ever talk, yet came to the same conclusion. What about Del Bigtree? He found the same thing. In fact, Bigtree’s attorney calculated a VAERS URF of 50 well before Kirsch did. So why pick on Kirsch?
If the fact checker uses a pseudonym, why can’t you tell us what your name is? Are you going to tell us who funded you to do the hit piece?
Will you debate us in a recorded Zoom call where you can answer all our questions? We are eager to find out how we were fooled by all this data.
If the vax is so safe, why are there so many death entries in VAERS this year?
If you think there is simply “over-reporting” in VAERS this year, what is your actual evidence of that? All the people we talked to are reporting more events because there are more events happening. In fact, most people report that there are at least 100X more events this year than in previous years. So it seems like VAERS is actually under-reported this year, and not over-reported, don’t you think?
There are 5,288 symptoms that haven’t been reported for ANY vaccine in the last 5 years that are being reported for the first time in these vaccines. Why?
Why are there more adverse event reports this year than for every vaccine in the last 30 years combined?
If the URF isn't 41, what is the true URF and did you calculate it using the CDC-approved methodology like we did? (see The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome).
If we got it wrong, then tell us: How many people do you estimate have been killed by the COVID vaccines and how do you know?
One of the ways we computed the number of deaths from the vaccine was using an independent polling company. How was that gamed?
Why are athletes dropping by a 60X rate after the vax rollout?
How did Ernest Ramirez's son die?
How do you explain the causes of death of the 14 cases the CDC examined? 5 of them died from cardiac arrest!
How does he explain the results of Peter Schirmacher?
Why did Taiwan report more deaths from the vaccine than from COVID?
Why is the line slope going the wrong way in the Harvard study?
How do you explain that the biodistribution showing accumulation in the ovaries correlate with the high numbers of VAERS symptoms for menstrual problems many with huge elevations compared to baseline (previous vaccines).
Why are cardiologists reporting highly elevated # of cases of heart disease in kids after the vax rolled out?
Why is the cardio testing lab at UCSF now filled with kids 7 to 10 only AFTER the vaccines rolled out for that age range?
Why is a top California neurologist needing to report 2,000 VAERS events this year when in the last 11 years she's never need to report a single adverse event?
How do we explain the families where 3 relatives, all previously healthy, die within days after the COVID shot?
How do we explain Gavin Newsom being diagnosed with GBS within days after his booster? Isn’t it perfectly safe?
How did 2 cricket players recently vaccinated drop on the field within 10 minutes of each other? Bad luck?
Why does the CDC *REFUSE* to calculate and use the proper URF for VAERS when interpreting the safety data? Pfizer PROVED that VAERS is 5X underreported for myocarditis, and the CDC will not even acknowledge that? John Su is using a URF of 1. That is clearly false and misleading. Why are you not going after him? That is truly evil and corrupt. I’m not the bad guy here. This was in plain sight of the public (Pfizer slide with the Optum data (see my article about this).
How come undertakers report a huge increase in business right after the vaccines rolled out?
Why aren't the nursing homes disputing Abrien Aguirre's account that there were 10 times as many deaths from the vaccines than from COVID?
How come the CDC hasn't ascribed even a single death from the vaccines in light of Schirmacher's study? That’s inexplicable isn’t it?
Why are there so many vaccine-injured people that Facebook had to remove groups of 250,000 and more (multiple times).
Why aren't the vaccine injured getting any press?
Why did YouTube censor Dr. Peter Doshi's testimony? UCSF Professor Aditi Bhargava spoke as well and was censored. Why? Are you speaking out about that?
How come Jessica Rose’s myocarditis paper was pulled by the publisher? Are you making a stink about the corruption of science here? Or are you just trying to discredit me?
What about Maddie de Garay? Why didn't the FDA, CDC, or Pfizer ever investigate? Why did Janet Woodcock assure me they would and then did nothing? Why didn't they report the truth and stop the trial on the permanent paralysis. Her result aligns PERFECTLY with the mechanism of action of the drug? How can they have eliminated the vax as the cause without ever talking to her? They are supposed to assume it is the vax until they can show otherwise.
What about the 5X exclusions (vs placebo group) in the Pfizer trial? That can't be by chance can it?
How come there were so few all-cause deaths in the Pfizer study? It was supposed to be a representative group! There should be been around 110 deaths in each group, right?
How come Pfizer 6 months study shows more all cause deaths in the treatment group in than in the placebo group? Where is the PROOF that the vaccines are saving lives? Whoops!!!! No proof at all of a single life saved. As a fact checker, why aren’t you calling that out? Instead you are targetting me. Hmmmm.
Why were there 4X as many cardiac arrests in the vax group vs. placebo in the Pfizer Phase 3 study (6 month)? Seems pretty high. It wasn’t just bad luck since we see all these athletes in plain sight dropping. So isn’t it more likely than not this is real?
Aren’t you concerned that the trials going forward are too underpowered to resolve any of these questions?
Wasn’t there gaming in the Pfizer Phase 3 trials on adverse event reporting where people found it difficult/impossible to report AEs.
Despite the gaming of the AE reports, aren’t you alarmed at the statistically significant large increase in overall morbidity in all of the COVID vaccine trials (the paper US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good… by J. Bart Classen, MD).
How come the NIH and WHO did absolutely nothing when the fluvoxamine Phase 3 trial was published in Lancet? They didn't even note it in the guidelines. Did you protest that? Why not? It’s December 2, 2021 and the fluvoxamine recommendation was Last Updated: April 23, 2021. The Lancet article was widely covered by all major media, but the NIH did nothing. How do you explain that? Why aren’t you spending your valuable time focusing on that?
How come nobody can cite a SINGLE RCT that shows that masks work against COVID?
How come Professor Jeffrey Morris changed the topic whenever we tried to show him that the symptoms in VAERS were dose dependent? (Note: dose dependency is one of the most impressive indicators of causality, but we use all Bradford-Hill criteria to assess causality).
Dr. Steven A. Anderson of the FDA is supposed to be monitoring the VAERS data like a hawk. We have people highly qualified to who have spent months analyzing the VAERS data. Why does Dr. Anderson refuse to meet with us?
How come the FDA and CDC outside committee members all turned down a $1M research grant just to talk to us for a few hours and answer questions? What are they afraid of?
If the CDC and FDA members are independent, why did one of them admit in a private conversation that if they didn’t vote the way the FDA /CDC wanted they would be kicked off the committee like Martin Kulldorff.
If the vaccines are so safe, then why did CDC insiders tip off a friend of mine in January not to get the vaccines?
If the excess deaths in VAERS was not caused by the vaccine, then what is causing it and why isn’t the CDC investigating? These causes of death were not normal.
While it is amusing for people to refer to the Mclachlan VAERS study and argue that all the deaths were normal, that’s simply not what the study said. Shall we go through all 250 cases one by one? The paper said “Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.” So it is interesting that some people can definitively state that the vaccine didn’t cause their death. Are these fact checkers willing to go through the cases one by one with Scott and our team and show us all how we got it wrong?

When you find a “fact check” that addresses those 51 questions, that would be great because I have another 130 questions just like those which I’d love to hear them explain as well.

Debunking Steve Kirsch’s latest claims about covid vaccine deaths

Here is the Medium article. Whoever wrote this “fact check” clearly spent a lot of time putting together his case. Basically, this nameless, faceless person claims that Crawford cherry picked data and that the excess death data doesn’t line up with a deadly vaccine. I just learned about this on Dec 1 at 11pm.

The author says my motivation is ego and fame. Wow. This shows you the quality of his work. Is the author willing to challenge my team in a recorded debate? I seriously doubt it. But I’ve got an open invitation to do just that! Let’s find the truth. We are not afraid of a challenge. Is he? If you are “The Gift of Fire,” then please respond in the comments.

He asks in his title: “What motivates a tech millionaire to fight against covid vaccines?” I’d have a lot more respect for him if was able to get that simple question right. But he can’t even get that one right. Everyone who knows me and works with me will tell you the answer: “Mr. Kirsch just wants to save lives.” I would argue if he can’t get something simple like that out, that we should have a lot less confidence in anything else he says.

So rather than spend our time debunking his debunk, I want to issue a challenge to our anonymous “do gooder.” We’ll address all of your points in your article, if you address all the points above all in a LIVE RECORDED zoom call where we can set the record straight.

How about it?

Healthfeedback fact check

Today, for example, someone sent me this link from the “experts” at healthfeedback.org that fact checked two statements that they claim that I made:

"the ovaries get the highest concentration of [lipid nanoparticles from RNA vaccines]. This turns the ovaries into a very large manufacturing plant to turn out toxic spike protein"
"FDA experts reveal the Covid-19 Vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every 1 life they save"

The short story is the first statement was taken completely out of context and was referring to a chart that was limited to showing the body parts where we did not expect to see any lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivered. The second was a quote from The Expose that I never claimed. It was their mistake, not mine.

If we address the “context problem” of the first one and they mistake by The Expose in the second one, we are left with:

When we look at areas of the body where we didn’t expect to see the LNPs, the ovaries has the highest accumulation.
The VAERS data shows that the vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every life that they might save. It’s not just me that says that. The Walach and Kostoff papers, published in peer reviewed medical journals, say the same thing.

The facts supporting both of these statements are pretty straightforward.

Lawsuit LA Unified School District Over Mandates

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is bringing against the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD).

Yes, this is the same school district that is educating you on the benefits of vaccination WITHOUT telling you ANYTHING about the risks. In short, they are the ones giving you a one-sided view of the argument.

Also contributing affidavits in opposition of their mandate are:

Dr. Ledbetter

Dr. Fleming

Dr. Barke

Brian Isley

Dr. Tracy Darling

Dr. Jessica Rose

Nurse Tawny B.

Nurse Lexi T.

Nurse Devin T.

Nurse Jackie - TBD,

Ryan Cole - TBD

Dr. Aaron Kheriarty (UCI) -TBD

I’ve read the declarations from LAUSD. Two were submitted.

David Baca said what the policy was (get vaccinated or don’t participate on campus) but didn’t opine on the cost-benefit analysis.

Smita Malhotra, MD says everyone must wear masks because it is consistent with what the CDC says to do. And that all their policies are consistent with CDC guidelines. Because the FDA has “determined that the vaccines benefits outweigh the risks,” it must be safe. In short, we are doing this because we follow their guidance without asking any questions. We don’t do any checks on the science. A credible risk-benefit analysis from these agencies is not required. Who needs that when you have their assurances?

So there you go. Blind trust. We can safely ignore what the science and evidence say. No need to look at the data at all!

We have the facts and evidence on our side. They have the infallibility of the FDA and CDC on their side.

What matters now is what the court decides.

We’ll find out when the decision pops out around December 8. Stay tuned.

Nicole C. Pearson [SBN 265350]

Jessica R. Barsotti [SBN 209557]

Rita Barnett-Rose [SBN 195801]

LAW OFFICES OF NICOLE C. PEARSON

3421 Via Oporto, Ste. 201

Newport Beach, CA 92663

Telephone: (424) 272-5526

Nicole@FLTJllp.com; Jessica@FLTJllp.com;

Rita@FLTJllp.com

Attorneys for Petitioners CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, and PROTECTION OF THE EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS OF KIDS (P.E.R.K.)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE-CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, on its own and on behalf of its members, and PROTECTION OF THE EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS OF KIDS (P.E.R.K.), a California 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of its members,

Petitioners,

vs.

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a local educational agency and school district for the County of Los Angeles; MEGAN REILLY, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Los Angeles Unified School District; GEORGE MCKENNA, in his official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; MONICA GARCIA, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; SCOTT SCHMERELSON in his official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; NICK MELVOIN, in his official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; JACKIE GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; KELLY GONEZ, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; TANYA ORTIZ FRANKLIN, in her official capacity as a member of the LAUSD Board of Education; Respondents,

Respondents.

Case No.: 21STCP03429

DECLARATION OF STEVEN T. KIRSCH IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Date: December 8, 2021

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Dept.: 86

Complaint Filed: October 13, 2021

Trial Date: Not yet set

DECLARATION OF STEVEN T. KIRSCH

I, STEVEN T. KIRSCH, declare as follows:

1. I am an adult over 18 years of age and have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein this declaration, which are offered in support of the Reply in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction of Petitioners CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE – CA CHAPTER (“CHD”), and PROTECTION OF THE EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS OF KIDS (“PERK”) (hereinafter collectively “Petitioners”). If called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify under oath to the facts stated herein.

BACKGROUND

2. I attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) from 1974 to 1980 and earned a SB/SM from MIT. The main computer science auditorium at MIT is named after me.

3. I am a retired high technology executive, but, prior to my retirement, founded seven (7) high technology companies, two with billion-dollar market caps.

4. I am independently wealthy. I have no conflicts of interest. My sole motivation is to save lives. Making a positive difference in the lives of others gives me a sense of purpose and fulfills me. I have received many awards for my philanthropy over the past 20 years, the most notable being awarded the recipient of a “National Caring Award” from the Caring Institute in 2003. Senator Hilary Clinton presented me with the award in Washington DC in front of a very large audience.

5. In March of 2020, I was working as Chief Executive Officer at a digital money startup company, M10, when COVID impacted our operations.

6. In April 2020, I decided to put my company on hold to do things that could save lives. I donated $1M to start the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund. I raised another $5M and we funded research into early treatments for COVID.

7. The COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund funded fluvoxamine, an inexpensive, safe drug with virtually no side effects at the effective dose that can reduce the death rate from COVID by 12 times making it far more effective than any vaccine (e.g., the Pfizer vaccine only had only a 2X reduction in mortality in the clinical trials). (See 60 Minutes: Funding a Possible Early Treatment for COVID-19 in a 40-year-old Antidepressant, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fluvoxamine-antidepressant-drug-covid-treatment-60-minutes-2021-03-07/ aired on March 7, 2021).

PERSONAL VACCINATION

8. On March 29, 2021, I completed my second dose of Moderna. At the time, I was convinced by government assurances that the vaccines were safe and effective. I had no reason at all to question the experts. I had always complied with advice from the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”).

9. In early May, 2021, I began hearing stories from my friends who related stories of either themselves or loved ones who died or became permanently disabled shortly after being vaccinated. All of these cases were statistically unlikely if the government assurances of safety were true. However, I knew my friends weren’t lying, so that left only two possibilities: 1) the government was lying or 2) I am a very unlucky person. I put my job on hold and devoted full time to uncovering which option was more likely.

RESARCH FINDINGS

10. By May 25, 2021, it was more than clear to me what was going on, so I wrote a 287-page document detailing what I had learned on TrialSiteNews entitled “Should you get vaccinated?” That article had over 1 million views and over 18,000 “likes.” That is pretty amazing for a 287-page article! My article laid out the evidence behind my assertion that these COVID vaccines were more deadly than any vaccine in human history and should be immediately halted.

11. Specifically, I found that the vaccine doesn’t stay in your arm like most vaccines, but gets delivered everywhere in your body, including your brain, heart, lung, and reproductive organs. Secondly, the payload delivered by the vaccine causes cells to express a protein which is cytotoxic causes inflammation and blood clots, which leads to a wide range of neurological, cardiovascular, immunological, and reproductive symptoms. Ultimately, I found that COVID-19 vaccines kill more people than they save.

12. I also verified with a local neurologist who told me that in her 11 year in her current practice, her office has never had to make a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) report. This year, they need to make 2,000 VAERS reports and they have 20,000 patients. This is exceptional. It is clear, irrefutable evidence that these vaccines are thousands of times more dangerous than any vaccine that has been used in the last 10 years.

13. After publication of my article, for the very first time in my life, I was labelled as a spreader of misinformation and people told me that they no longer would speak to me. When I asked if there was anything wrong with my logic, nobody could point out a flaw in what I wrote. They said I was an evil person for opposing the supposedly “safe and effective” vaccines.

CORROBORATION OF FINDINGS

14. The conclusions of my original article that the COVID-19 vaccines kill more people than they save were subsequently confirmed by two papers published in peer-reviewed medical journals: one “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?” by Ronald Kostoff et al. and “The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations: Should We Rethink the Policy?” by Harald Walach et al. , both published in August 2021.

15. The conclusions of my original article that vaccines kill more people than they save were also subsequently confirmed by official government data: the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) stunning admission that in the clinical trials for Pfizer, more people died who got the vaccine than who got the placebo. Let me repeat that: The FDA admitted that vaccine killed more people than it saved.

16. On page 23 of the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action submitted by Dr. Ramchandra Naik on May 18, 2021, it says “From Dose 1 through the March 13, 2021 data cutoff date, there were a total of 38 deaths, 21 in the COMIRNATY group and 17 in the placebo group.” Since there were just two COVID deaths in the placebo group and 1 COVID death in the vaccine group, a net total of 1 death from COVID was saved by the vaccine. However, when all causes of death were considered, there were 4 net deaths (21-17). If there is 1 life saved, this means than 5 people died (since 1-5 = -4). In short, 5 people

lost their lives, one person was saved, resulting in a net loss of 4 people. Another way to look at this is that 5 times as many people lost their lives from all-cause mortality due to the vaccine as compared to the number who were saved from dying from COVID.

17. The bottom line is that Pfizer’s own clinical trial showed no evidence whatsoever that the vaccine was saving lives overall. In fact, it showed the reverse: the vaccine kills around 5 people (who die from the vaccine) for every 1 person saved from COVID.

18. The Pfizer trial also showed that for every 22,000 fully-vaccinated people, we would save a total of approximately 1 life from COVID. This means with 220M vaccinated people, we’d save only 10,000 lives from death from COVID, but this would be at a cost of at least 50,000 lives resulting in a net loss of 40,0000 lives after 220M full vaccinations.

19. In short, the vaccines are nonsensical. They do appear to save people from dying from COVID, however, at the cost of killing them from cardiac, neurologic, or immunologic causes caused by the vaccine itself. In short, the cure is worse than the disease.

20. The CDC is focusing the public’s attention exclusively on lives saved “from Covid” and completely ignoring the people killed and disabled from the vaccines.

21. Because the numbers in the Pfizer clinical trial were small and not statistically significant, they needed to be validated using larger sample sizes – real-world data – so I sought out assistance from researchers from all over the world and assembled 8 different methods and different data sources. Through this research we identified at least 150,000 excess deaths in the US were caused by the vaccine.

22. The results showed that we killed a minimum of 150,000 from the vaccine itself, but we saved 10,000 people from dying from COVID. This is an even worse tradeoff than the 5 to 1 calculated from the Pfizer clinical trial data. This is a 15 to 1 ratio. The detailed calculations and methodology are laid out in my article, “Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America.” These are only estimates, but these are conservative estimates, since I used the lowest death estimate of the 8 methods I used (the highest death estimates were over 300,000 people).

23. Just because the vaccine is deadly overall, it still might have a positive risk-benefit for certain age groups. However, because there was no risk-benefit analysis by age performed by the CDC (and still isn’t), I did the calculations myself, being very conservative in my calculations (e.g., assume the vaccine saves 100% of all COVID deaths). What I determined is that, even if the vaccine was 100% effective, is has a negative benefit for every age group and the younger you are, the worse it was.

24. For example, for very old people, we would kill approximately 2 people from all-cause mortality causes to save 1 person from dying from COVID. For 20-year-olds, the number was more than 6 people killed by the vaccine for every 1 person saved. At the time I did the calculation, data for younger people wasn’t available (since they hadn’t been vaccinated yet), but the trend was extremely clear: the younger you are, the more nonsensical vaccination was.

25. The detailed calculations are set out in my article, Vaccine risk benefit by age, and the table by age is on page 11 :

Computing the final V:C ratio

So here is our final result in one table that shows that the vaccines don’t make sense for any age group. The V:C ratio should be .1 or lower to make sense.

Age range V C V:C

20-30 67 11 6.09

30-40 120 31 3.87

40-50 209 76 2.75

50-60 436 185 2.36

60-70 1029 450 2.29

70-80 2133 1133 1.88

80+ 6266 3458 20.81

26. Although my work has not been peer-reviewed or published in a medical journal, the results are consistent with two papers published in peer-reviewed medical journals showing the same results: the vaccines kill more people than they save, they don’t make sense for any age group, and the younger you are, the more pronounced the harm (Kostoff and Walach papers previously mentioned).

DISPROVING THE RESULTS

27. I have over 100,000 followers on social media (Twitter, Gab, and Substack) and my analyses have attracted worldwide attention. Despite this, to date, there is not an alternative estimate that I am aware of that is more credible than what I have developed. If there was, I would have adopted it. I am more interested in truthful information being spread than being right. I am happy to be proven wrong.

28. I also publicly offered a $1M reward to any researcher who could find an error in one of the 8 methods I used to determine the 150,000 deaths caused by the vaccine that would significantly change the results. No one has come forward showing an error.

IMPACT OF FINDINGS

29. The most important conclusion from my work establishing that over 150,000 people have been killed by the COVID-19 vaccines means that the COVID-19 vaccines are more deadly than any vaccine in human history.

30. The normal “stopping condition” of a vaccine is around 50 deaths. For example, in 1976, we stopped the H1N1 vaccine after just 35 deaths (see https://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/30/ swine.flu.1976/index.html). These vaccines should have been stopped for all ages in January 2021. However, the FDA has not set a stopping condition for the vaccines.

31. I am friends with FDA acting commissioner Janet Woodcock and she refused to answer the stopping condition question.

32. I don’t know of anyone who knows what the stopping condition for the COVID-19 vaccines is. This is unheard of for a clinical trial. A clinical trial without a stopping condition would never be approved by the institutional review board (IRB). Before the COVID vaccines, this was unheard of.

33. The second most important conclusion from my work establishing that over 150,000 people have been killed by the COVID-19 vaccines is that, because the vaccine kills more people than it saves for every age group, it is nonsensical to vaccinate kids because you are much more likely to kill the child than to save his life.

34. A careful risk-benefit analysis for children 5 to 11 was done by Dr. Toby Rogers who found that we will kill an estimated 117 kids from the vaccine for every child we save from a COVID death. (See “What is the Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNTV) to prevent a single COVID-19 fatality in kids 5 to 11 based on the Pfizer EUA application?” published October 31, 2021. I have read his analysis and are not aware of any flaws. He used the best data from all sources for all of the values. (Ibid.) I believe it would be hard for anyone to dispute it. Over 20,000 people have viewed his analysis and there has been only praise in the comments that were posted. That is the ultimate peer review.

REFUSAL OF MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITIES TO ACCEPT RESULTS

35. Early treatments are extremely effective against COVID. Nobody has to lose their life from COVID if they are treated early. Uttar Pradesh in India uses early treatments, not vaccination. Their COVID death rate is now nearly zero. Uttar Pradesh’s population is 204 million, which is just 1/3 smaller than the United States’ population of 329M. Here is the most current data from Johns Hopkins University :

36. There are people inside the CDC that know all of this is happening, but they are told that if they speak out, they will be fired. I know this because I have spoken to a trusted source who explained to me that that is how he knew to avoid taking the COVID vaccines in January.

37. I have made multiple offers to the CDC and FDA to discuss my findings, but they refuse to have a meeting to discuss any of the results from the team of 29 experts that I collaborate with.

38. I attempted to get the attention of the members of the outside committees of the FDA and CDC by offering any of these members $1M just to have a recorded, on-the-record discussion of my results for a few hours. If I was wrong, they could correct our errors – this would significantly reduce vaccine hesitancy – no member was interested in my offer.

THE VACCINES DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD: RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSI WEIGHS

AGAINST VACCINATING CHILDREN

39. No one in the world can produce any evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines reduce all-cause mortality (death) or morbidity (disability). In fact, all the evidence I am aware of shows the reverse.

40. In US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity,” published August 25, 2021, the peer-reviewed medical article points out the statistically significant rise in all-cause morbidity for all vaccines.

41. The CDC examined the cause(s) of death of 14 children who died shortly after vaccination and were reported in the VAERS. In all cases, the causes of death were consistent with the causes of death elevated by the COVID vaccine, including pulmonary embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, suicide, and cardiac arrest. The causes of deaths of these children were not consistent with “natural causes” of death. Despite this, the CDC stated the cause of death with absolutely no commentary whatsoever regarding possible vaccine injury, and changed the topic. (Ibid.)

42. We would typically expect only 1.6 deaths in that age group to be reported in VAERS and we got 14, confirming my 12 “excess deaths” conclusion. The 1.6 was derived using VAERS queries over the period from 2015 to 2019 looking at deaths in that age range.

43. The VAERS database is approximately 41 times under-reported according to the CDC’s own methodology, so the 12 excess deaths actually represent 492 child deaths that were excess and caused by the vaccine.

44. The vaccines also are linked to prion diseases, a family of rare progressive neurodegenerative disorders that affect both humans and animals, that are distinguished by long incubation periods, neuronal loss, and a failure to induce inflammatory response. Once prion disease starts in the brain, it is not treatable and always leads to death. 100% of the time. No exceptions.

45. Finally, these vaccines are based on the original “wild type” virus. It is unknown how effective these vaccines will be against the new Omicron or any other variant, especially in kids where we do not even have data regarding vaccine efficacy from the original vaccines.

46. Based upon my analysis, research, and understanding of the data described in greater detail herein, above, mandating a vaccine for kids for an unknown risk that kills 117 kids within 6 weeks of vaccination, and/or causes brain damages in order to save 1 COVID life is nonsensical, unethical, and immoral. If these vaccine mandates are not halted immediately, kids will unnecessarily lose their lives. That is irreparable harm.

47. Since we couldn’t cost-benefit justify vaccination with the current variants, it will be even harder to conduct with respect to the newest variants, which appear to be very different from the original wild-type variant. Furthermore, Omicron is rapidly spreading and yet very mild, making vaccination even more unnecessary.

CONCLUSION

48. There are clear, significant dangers and a dubious benefit to vaccines, generally but especially now due to Omicron, and especially of children. COVID-19 vaccination clearly is killing people, and administering a vaccine designed for the “wild type” variant against what will soon be a pandemic of Omicron without clear scientific proof in double blind randomized trials of a positive all-cause mortality benefit is unethical. It is experimenting on our kids.

49. The failure to disclose the risks of adverse events (including death) violates California Health and Safety Codes, Federal laws against human experimentation and relating to emergency use authorizations, and the Nuremberg Code, among other things.

50. The mandated vaccination of our children is reprehensible and should be halted immediately.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on this 1st day of December, 2021.

______________________________

STEVEN T. KIRSCH

15 things everyone needs to know about COVID and how to treat it

Steve Kirsch's Newsletter

Avoid all the COVID vaccines, even Novavax. Just say no. It’s not for anyone. No exceptions. The data show that these vaccines kill more people than they save. You can end up dead or disabled or with a compromised immune system for the rest of your life. For kids, for example, we will kill over 100 kids to save 1 life from COVID. These are the most dangerous vaccines ever deployed; 800x more deadly than the smallpox vaccine. Novavax has a much better safety profile than the current vaccines, but there may be serious, longer term risks here that we need to quantify. It’s not their fault… the spike protein is particularly toxic because it was designed to be toxic (I’m friends with Li-Meng Yan; we talk). The experts I work with say “not enough data.” So our advice is let’s wait for the data and use early treatment in the meantime. You can never unvaccinate yourself and right now early treatments are a great solution with higher efficacy and known safety.
If you get COVID, start early treatment ASAP as soon as you have symptoms. Early treatment is much safer and there is a much lower chance of long haul COVID, MIS-C, and adverse events. See my treatment advice for details; many options are available without a doctor or prescription. The immunity you acquire from getting the real virus is both robust and durable.
Make sure you have your early treatment drugs already in your house so you can start treatment as soon as you have symptoms.
If you aren’t sure you have COVID, you can get a PCR test, but these can be inaccurate. If you have symptoms, you can use a home test kit such as the binax now kit (Note: they will not work unless you currently are symptomatic, so don’t use these kits for employer screening; it’s a complete waste of money).
The mainstream media wants to keep you in the dark about the truth about these vaccines so they only tell you one side of the story and they censor competent speakers on the other side. This is why you will never see Peter McCullough on CNN, in the NY Times, etc. They will never sponsor a debate between the top experts on both sides because that would destroy the false narrative and damage the reputation of the mainstream media. So they have to tell only one side of the narrative.
The whole pandemic response was unnecessary. The lockdowns, social distancing, masking, business restrictions, etc. We knew back in March 2020 that a cocktail of repurposed drugs given early could keep people out of the hospital and turn COVID into a mild cold with no long-term side effects.
The NIH is deliberately suppressing early treatments that work like fluvoxamine, ivermectin, vitamin D, inhaled budesonide, etc. Even after fluvoxamine was proven in a large Phase 3 clinical trial with an incredible 12X reduction in hospitalization, the NIH did nothing. Absolutely nothing. They do not want you to know about fluvoxamine. When Fareed and Tyson tried to get the NIH and FDA’s attention in March 2020 on their protocol which has a 99.76% risk reduction (better than anything else), they were ignored.
Masks don’t work. It is political theater to prove they can use fear to get you to do nonsensical things. Nobody will debate my team on this because it would destroy their argument.
Never trust the CDC, FDA, NIH, and medical community again. This is the most dangerous vaccine in human history and the CDC couldn’t find a single safety signal (it was the DoD that spotted myocarditis). The NIH is sand-bagging early treatment. The mainstream medical community is basically believing everything the FDA and CDC are telling them without bothering to double-check anything.
Avoid the hospital. If you do get hospitalized, refuse intubation and remdesivir. Get a court order to get cyproheptadine, fluvoxamine, and/or ivermectin. You will need a court order because all hospitals will refuse these proven treatments. See the list of hospitalized treatment protocols.
They could end vaccine hesitancy worldwide anytime they wanted. All they have to do is agree to a single 3 hour debate. But none of the so-called experts who claim the vaccines are safe will debate our team. This is because they know they will lose. So they must ignore and censor us. Their unwillingness to have a fair scientific discussion with experts on both sides tells you everything you need to know about who has the better argument.
If you maintain very high levels of Vitamin D, you can greatly reduce your chance of getting sick from COVID. It’s the simplest thing to do and it is safe and effective. There’s a strong correlation between your vitamin D level and your risk of dying from COVID-19. At a level of 17 ng/mL, the death rate is nearly 100%. At a level of 35 ng/mL, the death rate is near zero. It is inexplicable that the medical community and/or NIH isn’t telling people this.
Fluvoxamine is highly effective if you get COVID. The best dose is 50mg twice a day for 14 days. Take it as soon as you have symptoms. The side effect profile is near zero as long as you avoid coffee. If you can’t get fluvoxamine, you can use 30mg once a day of fluvoxetine. Both drugs work for hospitalized patients as well. Many other drugs are very effective. See my treatment advice for details.
The single best drug if you get COVID is Interferon Lambda, but it is not FDA approved; it is available only in clinical trials. It works because it replaces the interferon that the virus disables when it attacks you. D-dimer is greatly reduced in the treatment group… this is very telling.
The reason all this happened is that people don't double-check authorities. They believe the authorities, and it creates a domino effect. They aren't inherently evil, just trusting the wrong people. They think I'm an evil person because I disagree with the authorities. I disagree because the data doesn’t support what we are being told. Few people (especially doctors) have the time/expertise to understand/analyze VAERS. We haven't found *anyone* in the world who is able to "correct" our calculation. But as long as people think we are misinformation spreaders, nobody listens to us. Most people will make decisions based on the # of “experts” supporting a viewpoint, not by looking at the data directly; few people have the time and expertise to do that. I did that in early May, 2021 and here is the first article I wrote at the time (Should you get vaccinated?) after I was convinced the vaccines were causing harm. I lost a lot of friends after writing that article, but it was the right thing to do and I don’t regret it. I think I’ve made more than 100X new friends by standing up for science and truth. I also found a very odd asymmetry… everyone on our side will happily engage the other side in a discussion on the merit, but not vice versa. They just want to tell us we are wrong, but will not explain to us why we are wrong (since they don’t know).

Fluvoxamine To Treat COVID: what you need to know

Kirsch said that his attempts to promote fluvoxamine are being curtailed. He says that Facebook took down one of his posts announcing his appearance on 60 Minutes. The post read: "I will be featured on 60 Minutes this Sunday talking about fluvoxamine as an effective treatment for COVID-19 to prevent hospitalization and death. Please watch and tell your friends!"

How to treat COVID, long-haul, and COVID vaccine side-effects

Steve Kirsch: The short story is fluvoxamine:

Doctors who have used fluvoxamine in the US and other countries swear by it.

There are a few doctors who stopped using it due to side effects. This was likely due to 1) using a dosage higher than 50mg twice a day and/or 2) not telling the patient to lay off the caffeine.

Drug has been proven to work in every trial it has been tested in, including outpatient and inpatient studies.

There is zero evidence fluvoxamine does nothing or is harmful. Zero. All the trials have been positive.

NIH and WHO refuse to acknowledge it works since it will cause vaccine hesitancy if it is known that there is a drug that turns COVID into a mild disease. That’s why they didn’t change their recommendation when the Phase 3 trial was published in Lancet. I fully expected both organizations to do absolutely nothing. They knew in advance it was coming and on the day the paper was published they ignored it entirely.

There are 4 outpatient studies that have been done (2 at WashU, 1 in Brazil, and one in Croatia). Three have been reported out: all that have reported were successful. The WashU Phase 3 study hasn’t been disclosed yet, but they had compliance problems with their patients this time around (phase 2 was local so the patients were very compliant).

My favorite dosage is 50mg twice a day for 14 days. This was shown to be very tolerable (no side effects in 99% of patients) and extremely effective (no hospitalizations and death if you start it ASAP after first symptoms). This is what the Seftel trial at Golden Gate fields used.

No long haul symptoms if you start the drug ASAP after first symptoms. P value was 10^-14 on that one. Doesn’t get much better than that.

The Lancet paper showed that if you were treated early enough and took the drug as prescribed (it only works if you take it), it was shown to reduce your chance of death by 12X making it far more effective than any other drug for COVID.

If you take fluvoxamine, please avoid caffeine while on the drug. You will be wired for 24 hours if you don’t heed my advice.

You can use fluvoxetine as well (aka Prozac). Dosage there is 30mg once a day. Some countries don’t have fluvoxamine so this is the alternative.

Fluvoxamine works on hospitalized patients too, but no US hospital will let you use it (sound familiar? just like ivermectin). Reason is the hospital gets release from liability if they follow NIH guidelines. NIH doesn’t want you to get the drug since it would compete with Molnupiravir, so fluvoxamine will never make the NIH guidelines.

Fluvoxamine is way better than Molnupiravir, but the NIH doesn’t approve drugs on effectiveness. It’s whether Merck can make a killing that matters. Think about it … Molnupiravir has a 50% risk reduction whereas fluvxoamine is over 90%. Fluvoxamine has a 40 year safety track record. Molnupiravir followed patients for only 30 days because they know the drug is dangerous. The NIH picks the drug that makes the most money for the drug companies regardless of long-term safety… Molnupiravir!

All this was known back in January 2021 when a key opinion leader panel of experts from NIH, CDC, FDA, academia, and journal editors voted by over 2:1 to recommend that fluvoxamine be recommended to physicians to discuss with patients. All the medical journals refused to publish the meeting notes (rejected by 6 journals). Sound familiar? Yeah, it’s like ivermectin. Same deal.

If you ask your doctor for any evidence that fluvoxamine doesn’t work or is harmful (like a DB-RCT which is the only thing they trust), they will show you nothing. But they will refuse to give it to you even after being proven in a Phase 3 trial that was approved by the WHO. It used to be that a Phase 3 study would do it. No more. It’s all about NIH saying it is OK.

Most doctors won’t use it until NIH greenlights it, no matter what the science says. Medicine today isn’t about saving your life. It is about following orders and making money for the drug companies and protecting the doctor from liability and losing his medical license.

I’m sorry to sound so cynical. I’m just telling you the truth. I learned this the hard way. Fauci wants the vaccine to be the only option, Cliff Lane works for Fauci, and Cliff follows his orders. This is why Cliff doesn’t talk to me.

And he won’t talk to you either if you ask nosy questions like “Cliff, my risk benefit analysis shows you should be rushing to recommend this drug. Can I see your risk-benefit analysis?”

Note: normally I have lots of hyperlinks to all the sources, but I’m pressed for time. My website www.skirsch.io has tons of info on fluvoxamine with all the links.

Dr. Steve Kirsch Bombshell Testimony at FDA Vaccine Hearing

Why are we killing people to save lives with vaccines?

Why Is Medical Corruption Being Ignored? 12 Examples

Steve Kirsh's newsletter - I thought I'd start a list to capture what is going on. Nobody in the mainstream medical community seems to mind these abuses. They are remaining silent, so I guess these are all OK nowadays.

Jessica Rose’s paper exposing how dangerous vaccine-induced myocarditis was “temporarily removed” by the publisher of the journal over the objections of the Editor and everyone else. The reason is given: “it wasn’t an invited paper.” That is incorrect since the Editor was the one that handled the paper. It is still removed as of this writing. I don’t think it will ever be re-instated.
Fluvoxamine was shown in a large Phase 3 clinical trial to reduce death from COVID by 12X. This is the most effective drug ever discovered for COVID. Nothing else has a better effect size. All the earlier trials were 100% successful. It even works in hospitalized patients. The FDA, CDC, NIH, and WHO all ignored it. Stunning, but totally expected. It only works if it is from a major US drug company. Repurposed drugs don’t count.
Article in the BMJ shows the corruption of the Pfizer clinical trials depended on by the FDA to justify drug approval. Ignored by the ACIP committee doing the approval on the same day the story hit. They didn’t even mention it. The article noted that even after Pfizer knew about the corruption, they awarded the company four more contracts.
Researchers have to sue the FDA to see the Pfizer data (story and lawsuit). Nobody is revealing the data like they are supposed to do. I wonder why?
Maddie de Garay is paralyzed for life in the Pfizer 12-15 clinical trial. It is reported in the trial results as mild abdominal pain. FDA agrees to investigate but does nothing. No warning is ever given to parents that the vaccine can permanently cripple their child. Nobody seems to mind that the FDA and CDC never investigated it. Mainstream media ignores the story.
One of the world’s top epidemiologists wrote a paper that points out cracks in the false narrative. It easily passes peer review and the publisher tells him it will be published. It is never published.
Fluvoxamine was recommended to be used by doctors on a shared decision-making basis against COVID by a panel of key opinion leaders by more than a 2:1 margin. Written up in Washington Post op-ed. Seven medical journals refuse to publish the meeting notes (after taking months to give an answer). It’s still unpublished. So nobody will know.
The CDC still claims they haven’t found a causal link between death and the COVID vaccines even though autopsy results show definitively that the vaccines are killing people (see this article and this confirmation by other German pathologists).
The CDC still claims that the spike protein is harmless despite numerous peer reviewed papers showing the opposite.
The CDC and NIH ignore ivermectin despite multiple peer-reviewed systematic reviews and meta analyses showing it works. Not only that, they go out of their way to make it hard to get and the AMA recommends people not use it. But this is the highest level of evidence medicine! They aren’t walking the talk for this drug.
Paul Offit and others on the FDA and CDC panel say there are more cases of myocarditis from COVID than from the vaccines. After he’s conclusively shown to be wrong, he doesn’t acknowledge it.
And my personal favorite is that everyone ignores my analysis of the VAERS data showing 150,000 deaths from the vaccine. They told me “it isn’t peer reviewed.” But it is. Lots of my peers have reviewed it and found it very solid. But there are other papers that are peer reviewed and published that show the same result (which I cite at the start). So if I’m wrong about the 150,000 deaths (which I showed 8 different ways), then why won’t anyone show me their “correct” analysis of the data we have? Whenever I ask that question, I get silence. Every time. Nobody in the medical community likes reading stuff that goes against their belief system it seems.

What’s sad is that all of the above corruptions are unambiguous, but leading medical “authorities” are silent on all of them.

I’m sure I missed a lot of things. Please comment below about your favorite example of the corruption of science.