Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts

How Angry Moms Are Saving Our Democracy From Mass Hypnosis


Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine, breaks down the "mass formation" phenomenon that makes it difficult to reason with those who have fallen victim to the globalist leader propaganda. Hear what he says is the hope we have before a total takeover.


As many of you know, I have spent time researching and speaking about mass psychosis theory. Most of what I have learned has come from Dr. Mattias Desmet, who realized that this form of mass hypnosis, of the madness of crowds, can account for the strange phenomenon of about 20-30% of the population in the western world becoming entranced with the Noble Lies and dominant narrative concerning the safety and effectiveness of the genetic vaccines, and both propagated and enforced by politicians, science bureaucrats, pharmaceutical companies and legacy media.

What one observes with the mass hypnosis is that a large fraction of the population is completely unable to process new scientific data and facts demonstrating that they have been misled about the effectiveness and adverse impacts of mandatory mask use, lockdowns, and genetic vaccines that cause people’s bodies to make large amounts of the biologically active coronavirus Spike protein.

These hypnotized by this process are unable to recognize the lies and misrepresentations they are being bombarded with on a daily basis, and actively attack anyone who has the temerity to share information with them which contradicts the propaganda that they have come to embrace. And for those whose families and social networks have been torn apart by this process, and who find that close relatives and friends have ghosted them because they question the officially endorsed “truth” and are actually following the scientific literature, this can be a source of deep anguish, sorrow, and psychological pain.

It is with those souls in mind that I included a discussion of the mass formation theory of Dr. Mattias Desmet during a recent talk I gave in Tampa, Florida to an audience of about 2,000.  As I looked out into the audience and spoke, I could see the relief on many faces, and even tears running from the eyes of stoic men.

Unknown to me, someone recorded the speech and appended the vocal track to a series of calming images of natural landscapes, producing a video that has gone viral throughout the world.  A link to the video, as well as some notes to clarify and supplement the talk, are appended below. Many have told me that they find it very healing.  I hope it may help you also.
A brief overview of Mass Formation, which was developed by Dr. Mattias Desmet. He is a psychologist and a statistician. He is at the University of Ghent in Belgium.  I think Dr. Mattias is onto something about what is happening and he calls this phenomenon:

MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS

So, when he says “mass” formation, you can think of this as equivalent to “crowd” formation. One can think of this as:

CROWD PSYCHOSIS

The conditions to set up mass formation psychosis include lack of social connectedness and sensemaking as well as large amounts of latent anxiety and passive aggression. When people are inundated with a narrative that presents a plausible "object of anxiety" and strategy for coping with it, then many individuals group together to battle the object with a collective singlemindedness. This allows people to stop focusing on their own problems, avoiding personal mental anguish. Instead, they focus all their thought and energy on this new object.

As mass formation progresses, the group becomes increasingly bonded and connected. Their field of attention is narrowed and they become unable to consider alternative points of view.  Leaders of the movement are revered, unable to do no wrong. 

Left unabated, a society under the spell of mass formation will support a totalitarian governance structure capable of otherwise unthinkable atrocities in order to maintain compliance. A note: mass formation is different from groupthink. There are easy ways to fix group think by just bringing in dissenting voices and making sure you give them platforms.  It isn’t so easy with mass formation.  Even when the narrative falls apart, cracks in the strategy clearly aren’t solving the issue, the hypnotized crowd can’t break free of the narrative.  This is what appears to be happening now with COVID-19.  The solution for those in control of the narrative is to produce bigger and bigger lies to prop up the solution.  Those being controlled by mass formation no longer are able to use reason to break free of the group narrative.

Of course, the obvious example of mass formation is Germany in the 1930s and 40s. How could the German people who were highly educated, very liberal in the classic sense; western thinking people… how could they go so crazy and do what they did to the Jews? How could this happen?
To a civilized people?  A leader of a mass formation movement will use the platform to continue to pump the group with new information to focus on.  In the case of COVID-19, I like to use the term “fear porn.”  Leaders, through mainstream media and government channels continuously feed the “beast” with more messaging that focuses and further hypnotize their adherents.

Studies suggest that mass formation follows a general distribution:

30% are brainwashed, hypnotized, indoctrinated by the group narrative

40% in the middle are persuadable and may follow if no worthy alternative is perceived

30% fight against the narrative.

Those that rebel and fight against the narrative, become the enemy of the brainwashed and a primary target of aggression.

One of the best ways to counter mass formation is for those against the narrative to continue to speak out against it, which serves to help break the hypnosis of some in the brainwashed group as well as persuade the persuadable middle to choose reason over mindlessness.

Dr. Desmet suggests that for something as big as COVID-19, the only way to break the mass formation psychosis is to give the crowd something bigger to focus on.  He believes that totalitarianism maybe that bigger issue.  Of course, after COVID-19, global totalitarianism may be the biggest issue of our time.  

Declaration of Independence From Institutions That Lack Integrity

Robert Malone Doctrine
The Robert Malone Doctrine 

Hello Everyone! As many of my friends have requested that I write a newsletter on a more regular basis, this is an initial attempt to honor that request!

Due to my new reality as someone willing to bring truth to power, my wife Jill and I have been traveling extensively. This fall we have gone to Rome, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Maui, Alaska, Texas and Florida trying to save lives and expose what we believe to be an extremely corrupt situation with big pharma, world governments, big tech legacy media, and national and international public health organizations working together to make authoritarianism the new world reality through censorship, lockdowns, mandates, job loss and slander of people willing to share information outside of the “official” CDC and WHO positions. Through this process, I have been slandered and censored. This is the behavior of bullies, thugs, and third-tier intellects. One reporter recently referred to me as the “most vilified scientist in the world.”

This has been quite exhausting and yet also strangely rewarding. I believe that “we”, and I mean the collective “we” of myself and so many of my colleagues, are slowly making a difference. People from all walks of life and political spectrums are self-assembling and working together for the common good. Examples include:

The International Alliance of Physicians and Scientists (https://globalcovidsummit.org/)

EU-based group: Ippocrate (https://ippocrateorg.org/)

The Council of Nations United for Life and Truth (CONUVIVE) in Latin America

North American-based organizations:

FLCCC (https://covid19criticalcare.com/), AAPS (https://www.aaps.org/home)

Children’s Health Defense (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/)

Unity Project (https://unityprojectonline.com/)

All of these organizations are committed to coming up with new ways of thinking about organizational structure and bioethics. Bioethical standards and the laws that enforce them matter - that has become crystal clear in all of this. And whether or not one believes that SARS-CoV-2 is the result of a gain-of-function research, it is clear that it is time to revisit and update the international biowarfare treaty.

So, a few weeks ago, Jill and I found ourselves in Maui. It was most definitely not a vacation! We were there to spread the word that mandates do not have a place in a free society (particularly for experimental drugs and vaccines), that a wide range of drugs works to save lives from COVID-19 if administered early during the infection, that children with their very low risk of disease do not need to be vaccinated unless they are high risk and/or have co-morbidities and that physicians, including physicians on Maui, must be able to practice medicine without interference from government, hospitals or insurance companies.

That trip was very successful. We were able to meet and educate many politicians and physicians on Maui and on other islands. There was a successful medical professional teaching workshop and a rally attended by 4,000 people. In this, I need to specifically acknowledge Dr. Ryan Cole, Steve Kirsch and Dr. Richard Urso, who were also in Maui to help share their knowledge and to spread the word.

While Jill and I were in Maui, we were approached by some amazing thought leaders on the island, by the names of Andrew Aken, Edward Dowd, Thomas Lewis, and Barry O'Keefe. These men came to us with a document they had written entitled “The Malone Doctrine”. This doctrine, regarding integrity in organizations, is fundamentally important.

We believe that “The Malone Doctrine” should become a central component of the core values and guiding principles for any ethical organization involved in health and wellness oversight, delivery, policy and/or medical research. Every physician that I have asked to review this document has agreed - this gets right to the heart of the problem, which has resulted in this amazingly dysfunctional global public health response to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. A pervasive lack of integrity.

We will be writing and discussing this concept in more detail for weeks, months and years to come.

Please join me in our quest to build out “the Malone Doctrine” as a new way to bring integrity to organizations.

For those who need further convincing, I suggest the following peer-reviewed paper:

COVID-19 Mortality Risk Correlates Inversely with Vitamin D3 Status, and a Mortality Rate Close to Zero Could Theoretically Be Achieved at 50 ng/mL 25(OH)D3: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background: Much research shows that blood calcidiol (25(OH)D3) levels correlate strongly with SARS-CoV-2 infection severity. There is an open discussion regarding whether low D3 is caused by the infection or if deficiency negatively affects the immune defense. The aim of this study was to collect further evidence on this topic.

Methods: Systematic literature search was performed to identify retrospective cohort as well as clinical studies on COVID-19 mortality rates versus D3 blood levels. Mortality rates from clinical studies were corrected for age, sex, and diabetes. Data were analyzed using correlation and linear regression.

Results: One population study and seven clinical studies were identified, which reported D3 blood levels preinfection or on the day of hospital admission. The two independent datasets showed a negative Pearson correlation of D3 levels and mortality risk (r(17) = -0.4154, p = 0.0770/r(13) = -0.4886, p = 0.0646). For the combined data, median (IQR) D3 levels were 23.2 ng/mL (17.4-26.8), and a significant Pearson correlation was observed (r(32) = -0.3989, p = 0.0194). Regression suggested a theoretical point of zero mortality at approximately 50 ng/mL D3.

Conclusions: The datasets provide strong evidence that low D3 is a predictor rather than just a side effect of the infection. Despite ongoing vaccinations, we recommend raising serum 25(OH)D levels to above 50 ng/mL to prevent or mitigate new outbreaks due to escape mutations or decreasing antibody activity.

Interviews, podcasts, and shows have also become my new daily reality. I enjoy doing these, as they are a great tool to educate and bring awareness to the issues of stopping the mandates, allowing physicians to practice medicine, administer lifesaving drugs and limit untested COVID-19 vaccines to children. It is also the way we can work to break the censorship that is overtaking the internet.

In this capacity, “The New American” recently interviewed me at the farm and produced a quality video on many topics regarding COVID-19. This interview captures much of my current thinking on the COVID-19 public health response. If you haven’t seen it yet, I highly recommend this video. It is also a good one to share to friends and family. Click on the button below to view:

New American Interview: “Dr. Robert Malone: “This is the Largest Experiment Performed on Human Beings in the History of the World.””

To wrap this newsletter up. I wish the best to all of you and us in our fight to do what is right. My big takeaway in all of this today is that integrity matters.

Integrity in governments.

Integrity in organizations.

Integrity in nonprofit organizations.

Integrity in communities.

Integrity in our families.

…and most importantly, it starts with each of us.

Integrity within ourselves.

That is it for now!

Sincerely, Robert (and Jill)

Billionaires Fund New Company Goodinfo.us to Fight For Monopoly of Truth 'Disinformation'

It’s Happening, And Soros And The Libs Aren’t Happy - The Dan Bongino Show


The left is furious, and George Soros and the cat lady are leading the effort to strike back. In this episode, I address their latest plot. We also address Florida’s resurgence and a parent who refuses to be held captive by school board tyranny.  Here is the new venture https://goodinfo.us

fake liberal news



How To Pre Order "Truth Social" iPhone App Before It Launches

Truth Social Pre-Order

Trump announces new TRUTH social network and media group to fight ‘tyranny of Big Tech’

TRUTH Social is America’s “Big Tent” social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating against political ideology.

Truth Social Screen Shots

Shares of Trump-linked SPAC close up 350% following news of social media deal. The stock of SPAC company Digital World Acquisition Corp. skyrocketed on extremely heavy trading volume after news of a merger that would launch former President Donald Trump’s planned social media platform.  

Follow the stock on Reddit $DWAC

Trump Media & Technology Group and Digital World Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ: DWAC) have entered into a definitive merger agreement, providing for a business combination that will result in Trump Media & Technology Group becoming a publicly listed company, subject to regulatory and stockholder approval.  The transaction values Trump Media & Technology Group at an initial enterprise value of $875 Million, with a potential additional earnout of $825 Million in additional shares (at the valuation they are granted) for a cumulative valuation of up to $1.7 Billion depending on the performance of the stock price post-business combination. Trump Media & Technology Group’s growth plans initially will be funded by DWAC’s cash in trust of $293 Million (assuming no redemptions).

Trump Media & Technology Group's mission is to create a rival to the liberal media consortium and fight back against the "Big Tech” companies of Silicon Valley, which have used their unilateral power to silence opposing voices in America.

Trump Media & Technology Group (“TMTG”) will soon be launching a social network, named "TRUTH Social."  TRUTH Social is now available for Pre-Order in the Apple App store.  TRUTH Social plans to begin its Beta Launch for invited guests in November 2021.  A nationwide rollout is expected in the first quarter of 2022.  Those who are interested in joining TRUTH Social may now visit Truthsocial.com to sign up for the invite list.  

President Donald J. Trump, the Chairman of TMTG, stated, “I created TRUTH Social and TMTG to stand up to the tyranny of Big Tech. We live in a world where the Taliban has a huge presence on Twitter, yet your favorite American President has been silenced. This is unacceptable. I am excited to send out my first TRUTH on TRUTH Social very soon. TMTG was founded with a mission to give a voice to all. I'm excited to soon begin sharing my thoughts on TRUTH Social and to fight back against Big Tech. Everyone asks me why doesn’t someone stand up to Big Tech? Well, we will be soon!”

Patrick F. Orlando, Chairman/CEO of DWAC, stated, "Digital World was formed to create public shareholder value and we believe that TMTG is one of the most promising business combination partners to fulfill that purpose.  DWAC currently has $293 Million in trust, assuming minimal redemptions, which can fuel TMTG’s scale up, including to provide world class leading technology services to build strong and secure social networks and diverse media offerings. Given the total addressable market and President Trump’s large following, we believe the TMTG opportunity has the potential to create significant shareholder value.”

Additionally, TMTG intends to launch a subscription video on demand service (TMTG+). TMTG+ will feature 'non-woke' entertainment programming, news, podcasts, and more.  TMTG has named Scott St. John as the leader of TMTG+ Corporate Operations.  Scott St. John is the Executive Producer of “Deal or No Deal’ and “America’s Got Talent” and has produced over 1,000 hours of Network and Cable TV.

Please visit TMTG’s corporate website at www.tmtgcorp.com for a Company Overview, and a video tour of TRUTH Social. 

Hilarious George Carlin Video On Germs & Immune Systems

Standup comedian video on "why everyone has turned into a bunch of pussies. Our immune systems can defend for themselves."

Southwest Employees Protest Vaccine Mandates


One day after hundreds of Southwest Airlines employees protested outside the carrier's Dallas headquarters against the company's pending Covid-19 vaccine mandate, the company caved.

According to CNBC, the airline has scrapped a plan to place unvaxxed employees who have applied for - but not yet received a religious or medical exemption- on unpaid leave starting Dec. 8.

In recent days, executives for both Southwest and American urged employees to apply for exemptions if they can't get vaccinated for a legitimate medical - or sincerely held religious belief.

It’s the second Monday in October and it feels like another dam is breaking. Southwest pilots and FAA traffic controllers walked off the job this weekend, protesting injection mandates and creating aerial chaos with literally thousands of flights canceled. Will Biden fire them all like Reagan did in the 80’s?

Even though there’s more news today than lies in a CDC press conference, a lot of folks are facing imminent injection ultimatum deadlines. Should they resign? Take the jabs? Try to sue? What to do? Today I’m offering suggestions to all those folks who are facing reprehensible employment policies that treat them like cattle. Send to everyone who needs to see this.

Southwest Airlines’ headquarters in Dallas to protest against the mandate. "My body, my choice” 

Other airlines aren't deviating. United Airlines - which has a 96% vaccination rate among staff, instituted a vaccine mandate in August - one month before the Biden administration issued the Dec. 8 guidance for federal contractors. The company informed staff that they would be placed on unpaid leave if they received exemptions. Several employees sued the company over the decision, and a Ft. Worth, Texas judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the airline from moving forward with its plan.

American Airlines CEO Doug Parker, meanwhile, met with labor union leaders last Thursday to discuss how to move forward. Airline management "indicated that, unlike the approach taken by United, they were exploring accommodations that would allow employees to continue to work," according to a Monday note by the Association of Professional Flight Attendants, the union that represents American’s mainline cabin crews. "They failed to offer any specifics as to what such accommodations might look like at that time."

Dallas Southwest Airlines protest

 

Vaccine Passports Set the Stage for Increased Surveillance

funny vaccine passport

Western Acceptance of The Deceptively Labeled "Vaccine Passport" Will Usher in The Global Enslavement of Mankind and Allow the Communist Dictator "State" To Decide Whether You Live or Die.

It’s likely only a matter of time before you’ll be asked to prove your vaccination status in order to carry on with your daily life.

Story at-a-glance:

The U.K. government has given sizable grants to a number of private companies developing vaccine passports and digital certificates that show vaccination status.

It’s likely only a matter of time before you’ll be asked to prove your vaccination status in order to carry on with your daily life.

This blatant move toward an ever-increasing surveillance state is being welcomed by many who have been led to believe they’re necessary to protect public health and safety.

In the U.S., universities continue to institute lockdowns for students, going so far as to ban even outdoor exercise.

While many countries have suggested that the COVID-19 vaccine will not be mandated, by giving special privileges to the vaccinated, such as the ability to travel, attend social events or even enter a workplace, it essentially amounts to the same thing and insinuates a “cleaner” class of people in those who have been vaccinated.

For a weary public longing to get back to normalcy, vaccine passports represent a tantalizing carrot, being dangled as a mechanism for freedom. By showing proof that you’ve received a COVID-19 vaccine, perhaps you can once again board an airplane and travel freely, attend a concert or enjoy a meal in your favorite restaurant, just like you used to.

Except, being required to present your “papers” in order to live your life isn’t actually freedom at all — it’s discrimination, and even a move toward technocratic fascism, one that’s setting the stage for increased surveillance and erosion of your privacy.

Nonetheless, this blatant move toward an ever-increasing surveillance state is being welcomed by many who have been led to believe the passports are necessary to protect public health and safety.

Vaccine passports are in development

It’s likely only a matter of time before you’ll be asked to prove your vaccination status in order to carry on with your daily life. “The government seems to be developing vaccine passports by stealth, making sure the technology is in place for anyone who needs it,” wrote Lara Prendergast, The Spectator’s assistant editor.

She’s referring to the U.K. government, which has given sizable grants to a number of private companies developing such technology. This includes more than $86,000 to Logifect, to create and launch a vaccine passport app, and more than $104,000 to iProov and Mvine, which are developing digital certificates that show vaccination status.

As Prendergast noted, “Your phone would most likely be your vaccination passport. Everyone’s vaccination status is already being logged centrally by the National Immunization Vaccination System using their NHS number. This information could be easily linked with an app.”

Around the world, vaccine passports are rapidly being rolled out, including in Denmark, which was one of the first to roll them out. As of September 2021, dozens of countries around the world have implemented vaccine passports, while in the U.S., plans for vaccine IDs are under evaluation. International efforts are also underway.

The Commons Project and the World Economic Forum created the Common Trust Network, which developed the CommonPass app that’s intended to act as a health passport.

The app allows users to upload medical data such as a COVID-19 test result or proof of vaccination, which then generates a QR code that you will show to authorities as your health passport.

The proposed common framework “for safe border reopening” around the world involves the following:

Every nation must publish their health screening criteria for entry into the country using a standard format on a common framework.

Each country must register trusted facilities that conduct COVID-19 lab testing for foreign travel and administer vaccines listed in the CommonPass registry.

Each country will accept health screening status from foreign visitors through apps and services built on the CommonPass framework.

Patient identification is to be collected at the time of sample collection and/or vaccination using an international standard.

The CommonPass framework will be integrated into flight and hotel reservation check-in processes.

Eventually, the CommonPass framework will be integrated with already existing personal health apps such as Apple Health and CommonHealth. If you want to travel, your personal health record will be evaluated and compared to a country’s entry requirements, and if you don’t meet them, you’ll be directed to an approved testing and vaccination location.

Majority are in favor of ‘privacy-encroaching technology’

Even as overall mortality data separating deaths “from” COVID and “with” COVID show COVID-19 is hardly the deadly pandemic it’s been made out to be, fear-mongering remains in full effect — including warnings on the more infectious, mutated strain of SARS-CoV-2, Delta.

With fear still omnipresent, acceptance of “privacy-encroaching technology” that promises an illusion of safety is high.

In the U.K., researchers from the University of Bristol conducted two large surveys about such technologies, with overwhelming positivity reported. The first measured public acceptance of location tracking through your cellphone that would allow health agencies to monitor your contact with others to target social distancing and quarantine measures.

About 70% of the respondents said they would accept such an app that they could choose to download and, surprisingly, 65% also said they would accept such an app even if it was mandated by the government and used to locate those violating lockdown orders and issue fines and arrests.

A second survey evaluated acceptance of vaccine passports, with 60% stating they were in favor and only 20% stating they were strongly opposed. The study’s lead author, professor Stephan Lewandowsky, described those opposed as “surprisingly low,” adding, “It’s fascinating how people seem increasingly receptive to their personal data being used to inform themselves and others about what they can and can’t do.”

Prendergast put this widespread acceptance into further context for the British, who “have traditionally been deeply suspicious of the idea of an official asking for ‘papers, please‘”:

“[This] … is why there was such a backlash against Blair’s ID cards. As one journalist at the time put it:

“’If I am ever asked to produce my ID card as evidence that I am who I say I am, when I have done nothing wrong and when I am simply ambling along and breathing God’s fresh air like any other freeborn Englishman, then I will take that card out of my wallet and physically eat it in the presence of whatever emanation of the state has demanded that I produce it.’

“That journalist is now our Prime Minister. It would be an extraordinary turn of events if Boris Johnson ended up being the man who introduced an immunity identity system in Britain.”

U.S. universities institute jail-like restrictions

At every turn, long-standing societal norms — like college students gathering with friends in their dorm or even leaving their rooms for work and exercise — are disappearing. As of Feb. 7, for instance, the University of Massachusetts Amherst was in a “high risk” operational mode due to a “continuing surge in COVID-19 cases.”

The status, which was to be in place for a minimum of 14 days, made all classes remote and ordered all students, whether residing on or off campus, to self-sequester in their residences, except to get meals, attend medical appointments or undergo twice-weekly COVID testing.

Violating these orders would result in “disciplinary action,” according to a university press release, which could include removal from residence halls or suspension. Students were also informed that, should they decide to leave campus to self-sequester at home, “it is highly unlikely we will be able to accommodate your return.”

Even within a residence hall, students were told to remain in their rooms at all times except when using a restroom on their floor. Outdoor exercise or attending to the immediate needs of a pet was allowed, but only when wearing a mask and maintaining social distancing.

This wasn’t the case at UC Berkeley, however, which banned outdoor exercise in addition to extending dormitory lockdowns in February 2021. The only times students were allowed to leave their rooms during the lockdown were to obtain medical care, get required COVID tests, use an assigned bathroom or to obtain food from an outdoor dining kiosk, after which they were required to return immediately to their rooms.

Are you clean enough to travel?

While many countries have suggested that the COVID-19 vaccine will not be mandated, by giving special privileges to the vaccinated, such as the ability to travel, attend social events or even enter a workplace, it essentially amounts to the same thing and insinuates a “cleaner” class of people in those who have been vaccinated.

It’s reminiscent of the early days of the pandemic, when hand sanitizer and disinfectant wipes were flying off store shelves in a frenzy to clean away COVID. Now we know that transmission of COVID-19 by fomites — the term used for inanimate surfaces and objects that can transmit a pathogen — has been exaggerated.

Emanuel Goldman, a microbiology professor at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, suggested this in July 2020, when he stated that studies suggesting SARS-CoV-2 was easily spread via surfaces did not present real-life situation.

“In my opinion, the chance of transmission through inanimate surfaces is very small,” he said, and while period disinfection of surfaces, especially in hospitals, was a reasonable precaution, in public settings, he noted, “this can go to extremes not justified by the data.”

In February 2021, an editorial in Nature supported Goldman’s work, suggesting that costly and toxic disinfection efforts are misguided.

“Catching the coronavirus from surfaces is rare. The World Health Organization and national public health agencies need to clarify their advice,” the editorial reads. Yet, the New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority alone is spending an estimated $380 million annually on COVID-related sanitation, and when it asked the U.S. government whether they should be focusing on fomites or solely aerosols, they were told to continue their focus on fomites.

Writing in The Atlantic, Derek Thompson describes this as a type of “hygiene theater,” in which Americans are going through the motions of dutifully cleaning and, likely, over-disinfecting surfaces when the virus spreads most efficiently through the air.

Indeed, much of the COVID-19 pandemic response has been embroiled in theatrics, including mask mandates, for which the scientific evidence has been described as “astonishingly weak.”

Hygiene theater, much like the theater for vaccine passports, provides an illusion of safety, not one grounded in reality.

10-State Coalition Supporting Ban on Big Tech Censorship

big tech censorship

Texas Attorney General Paxton announced on Sept. 20 that he is leading a coalition of 10 states in filing an amicus brief with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in support of Florida’s law that attempts to regulate censorship on Big Tech social media platforms.

Paxton signed on behalf of Texas, joining the states of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, and South Carolina who have also filed an amicus brief in support of Florida’s law.

“The regulation of big tech censorship will inevitably suppress the ideas and beliefs of millions of Americans,” Paxton said in a statement. “I will defend the First Amendment and ensure that conservative voices have the right to be heard. Big Tech does not have the authority to police the expressions of people whose political viewpoint they simply disagree with.”

Florida’s SB 7072 law allows Floridians to take legal action against Big Tech platforms if they censor a user’s content without consistent standards.

The new bill also prevents Big Tech from banning Floridian political candidates. Social media companies that deplatform candidates for statewide office will be fined $250,000 a day. The fine is $25,000 per day when deplatforming candidates for other offices.

Big Tech companies that violate the law can be brought to trial for monetary damage, and the state’s attorney general can litigate companies that don’t comply with the law under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the bill into law in May but District Judge Robert Hinkle in June granted a temporary injunction preventing the governor from implementing the law after two Internet trade groups—NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Association— filed a lawsuit.

The trade groups argued the law may violate the First Amendment by compelling social media platforms to host offensive speech they otherwise would not and by interfering with their editorial policies.

The coalition in its amicus brief said the district court’s First Amendment analysis is “riddled with errors.”

“It veered off course from the outset by concluding that S.B. 7072 regulates speech when that law instead regulates conduct that is unprotected by the First Amendment: social media platforms’ arbitrary application of their content moderation policies,” the coalition wrote.

Earlier this month, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed Texas’s House Bill 20—similar to Florida’s law—which protects Texans from wrongful censorship on social media platforms.

House Bill 20 prevents social media companies with more than 50 million monthly users, such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, from banning users based on their political beliefs. The attorney general would also be able to take legal action on behalf of Texas residents that were banned or blocked by a platform due to such discrimination.

“We will always defend the freedom of speech in Texas,” Abbott said. “Social media websites have become our modern-day public square. They are a place for healthy public debate where information should be able to flow freely—but there is a dangerous movement by social media companies to silence conservative viewpoints and ideas. That is wrong, and we will not allow it in Texas. I thank Senator Bryan Hughes, Representative Briscoe Cain, and the Texas Legislature for ensuring that House Bill 20 reached my desk during the second special session.”

Your Body Their Choice - Medical Tyranny

Your Body Their Choice - Healthcare Tyranny
Tucker Carlson: "If they can force you to take a vaccine that you don't need, what can't they do?"

Your Body Their Choice - Healthcare Tyranny


A Church That Defied LA County COVID Health Orders May Win $400K

LA County Church wins $400K
LA County to pay $400,000 to settle with San Fernando Valley church that defied coronavirus orders

A legal battle between Los Angeles County, the state and a Sun Valley church that repeatedly flouted health restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic could be coming to an end, with the county Board of Supervisors being asked next week to approve a $400,000 payment to the church to settle the case.

According to a county staff report, the settlement calls for the state to pay an additional $400,000 to resolve the litigation with Grace Community Church. The report, first obtained by KNX Newsradio, indicates that the county has already spent more than $950,000 in attorneys fees and other costs related to the legal battle with the church.

The church, led by Pastor John MacArthur, repeatedly defied county health orders over the past year, most notably by continuing to hold indoor services despite a ban on such gatherings, while also refusing to enforce mask-wearing and social-distancing requirements for church-goers.

County health officials repeatedly cited the church, then took the matter to court to obtain an injunction requiring the church to adhere to health regulations, saying they were essential to control the spread of COVID-19. The church, meanwhile, sued the state and the county, claiming the COVID rules amounted to constitutional violations of religious freedom.

Last September, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell L. Beckloff issued a preliminary injunction sought by the county, but the church essentially ignored it, continuing to hold indoor services and violating other health mandates. That led county attorneys to seek a contempt ruling against the church.

Grace Community Church attorneys fought back, filing a motion to have the injunction lifted and the contempt request dismissed, citing two U.S. Supreme Court decisions. In one, a Catholic diocese and a group of Jewish synagogues successfully challenged New York's restrictions on churches. The high court later struck down the indoor worship ban while allowing caps on attendance and a ban on singing, according to the church's attorneys.

YouTube Has Censored 1 Million Videos For Having Opposing Views

YouTube creators censored

YouTube has removed 1 million videos for dangerous COVID-19 misinformation (aka opposing views) since February 2020, according to YouTube’s Chief Product Officer Neal Mahon.

Mahon shared the statistic in a blog post outlining how the company approaches misinformation on its platform. “Misinformation has moved from the marginal to the mainstream,” he wrote. “No longer contained to the sealed-off worlds of Holocaust deniers or 9-11 truthers, it now stretches into every facet of society, sometimes tearing through communities with blistering speed.”

At the same time, the Youtube executive argued that “bad content” accounts for only a small percentage of YouTube content overall. “Bad content represents only a tiny percentage of the billions of videos on YouTube (about .16-.18% of total views turn out to be content that violates our policies),” Mahon wrote. He added that YouTube removes almost 10 million videos each quarter, “the majority of which don’t even reach 10 views.”

Facebook recently made a similar argument about content on its platform. The social network published a report last week that claimed that the most popular posts are memes and other non-political content. And, faced with criticism over its handling of COVID-19 and vaccine misinformation, the company has argued that vaccine misinformation isn’t representative of the kind of content most users see.

Both Facebook and YouTube have come under particular scrutiny for their policies around health misinformation during the pandemic. Both platforms have well over a billion users, which means that even a small fraction of content can have a far-reaching impact. And both platforms have so far declined to disclose details about how vaccine and health misinformation spreads or how many users are encountering it. Mahon also said that removing misinformation is only one aspect of the company’s approach. YouTube is also working on “ratcheting up information from trusted sources and reducing the spread of videos with harmful misinformation.”

Here are some YouTube video alternatives people are moving to. 

Rumble, DailyMotion, BitChute, DTube, PeerTube,Vimeo 


Montana First U.S. State to Ban Vaccine Requirements For Employees

god bless Montana

MANDATES WILL BECOME CAREER SUICIDE FOR POLITICIANS & CEO'S

Montana is the only state where private companies can not require their employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine.  

Follow this story on Reddit for comments

Benefis Health Systems announced such a mandate earlier this year that had to be rescinded once Governor Gianforte signed a new law in may stating that’s not allowed.

State health professionals said it’s a “travesty” that this is no longer an option for employers as active cases are nearing 3,500.

While many large companies across the U.S. have announced that COVID-19 vaccines will be required for their employees to return to work in person, there is one state where such requirements are banned: Montana.

Under a new law passed by the state’s Republican-controlled Legislature earlier this year, requiring vaccines as a condition for employment is deemed “discrimination” and a violation of the state’s human rights laws.

Montana is the only state in the U.S. with a law like this for private employers, said Hemi Tewarson, executive director of the National Academy for State Health Policy.

GOP lawmakers who supported the bill in the state Legislature said it was needed in response to employers “coercing” employees to get vaccinations under threat of termination. Some of the loudest supporters of the bill were employees of Benefis Health System in Great Falls who were told earlier this year that COVID-19 vaccines would be necessary to keep their jobs.

Benefis was forced to backtrack on that plan when the law was signed by Gov. Greg Gianforte in May.

Gianforte, a former business executive who founded and ran a technology company, gave the bill the green light after changing it to allow health care facilities to require unvaccinated workers and those who refuse to disclose their vaccination status to wear masks and take other precautions.

He stood behind the law this week amid heightened scrutiny.

“While the governor continues to encourage Montanans to receive safe and effective vaccines, doing so is voluntary and no individual should face discrimination based on vaccination status,” Brooke Stroyke, a spokesperson for Gianforte, said in an email.

While the list of national corporations requiring vaccines of their employees who want to return to work in-person continues to grow, which now includes Google, Facebook, Walmart, and United Airlines, businesses in Montana don’t have that option.

“Most (businesses) feel like their hands are tied right now,” said Mike Rooney, operations director for Downtown Helena Incorporated, an organization that represents businesses in downtown Helena. “Some would definitely be very supportive of a vaccination requirement or a mask requirement.”

The Montana Hospital Association opposed the law before it took effect, warning that it would make it harder for the state to meet its need for medical services. Now, the association is saying their fears may come to fruition.

Dr. Neil Ku, an epidemiologist at Billings Clinic who sits on the board of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, said the law sets Montana apart in conversations about how to combat the coronavirus.

“It is very very difficult for me to participate in the conversation when everywhere in the country can talk about vaccinating their employees but I can’t,” Ku said.

Hospitals in Montana until recently required their employees to get most vaccines approved by the Centers for Disease Control, including the annual flu shot, providing an avenue for employees to opt-out for medical or religious reasons. Now, that is no longer possible, leaving both workers and patients vulnerable.

Across the U.S., 60% of those eligible are vaccinated against the COVID-19. In Montana, that number is 49%.

In Montana hospitals, employees are vaccinated at a higher rate, but without a requirement, patients must contend with added risk to their health when seeking care.

“It holds us out as an anomaly against the rest of the nation,” said Rich Rasmussen, president of the Montana Hospital Association. “We have to rely on recruiting from out of state. The rest of the nation is looking at us and they are saying, ‘I don’t know if I want to practice in Montana, because of their approach to patient and employee safety as it relates to vaccinations.’"

Facing the specter of a coronavirus surge, Montana employers are left to navigate their way to keep employees safe and the doors open.

“A lot of businesses feel like they don’t have the support right now, so for them, it’s about how do they figure it out on their own end,” Rooney said.

Read the article in Fortune

When Are Natural Immunity Passports Coming?

natural immunity passport

The looming disaster of immunity passports and digital identity

A digital ID that proves immunity will raise serious human rights issues. And the failure of the digital ID industry to deal with the issues of exclusion, exploitation, and discrimination puts the entire industry under question.

'Immunity passports' are a theoretical credential - most likely digital - that someone can prove that they have either had the virus and recovered, or have had a vaccination. 

Immunity passports are being hyped as a solution to ending lockdowns around the world by actors including the proponents of digital identity; the digital identity industry; think tanks; and the travel industry.

Yet there is currently no scientific basis for these measures, as highlighted by the WHO. The nature of what information would be held on an immunity passport is currently unknown.

The social risks of immunity passports are great: it serves as a route to discrimination and exclusion, particularly if the powers to view these passports fall on people's employers, or the police.

The digital identity industry - pushing their own products as immunity passport solutions - is failing to protect against these harms: they are interested in building wider digital identity systems, based on their pre-existing models, rather than developing a genuine solution to the risks of these passports.

Immunity Passports have become a much-hyped tool to cope with this pandemic and the economic crisis. Essentially, with immunity passports, those who are 'immune' to the virus would have some kind of certified document - whether physical or digital. This 'passport' would give them rights and privileges that other members of the community do not have.

This is yet another example of a crisis response that depends on technology, as we saw with contact-tracing apps. And it is also yet another instance of trying to rapidly respond to complex problems, as governments did after 9/11, by reaching for identity systems.

Fundamentally, for identity system design form must follow function. Identity systems are complex systems that can alter the relationship between the individual, the state, and all the companies and agencies who are granted power in between.

Yet proponents of immunity passports do not yet know the extent of the problem they are solving. Companies selling their pre-existing digital identity solutions should be viewed with suspicion; this is not a problem that has been 'solved' as we have yet to define what the problem is.

In fact, the scientific validity/rationale of 'immunity' is still under question. It is premature to start designing a system without a better understanding of immunity. Crucial questions have to be answered first:

  1. how and in what ways immunity to the virus is conveyed?
  2. what a testing regime would look like? For example, is it home-based or does it require a lab? Is it something that can be rolled out at scale quickly to broad populations or is it only accessible to some?
  3. how long does immunity last? and
  4. what are the prospects for a vaccine, how long will it last, and how will that be deployed?

Without an understanding of these issues, it is not possible to design a system that both 'works' in terms of giving the information that's needed for public health reasons and for managing the next steps of measures to manage lockdowns including the associated economic and social strains associated, while at the same time protecting fundamental rights.

Once answered, then we will all know what problem the identity system is designed to solve. Without the knowledge of how immunity works, we cannot possibly yet say what the design should be.

And even if that is resolved, the risks to individuals and communities emerging from 'immunity passports' are severe. Read the full article to explore all these issues.

Chart of Vaccination Rates By Country & States

Vaccination Rates By Country

Share of people taking vaccines for COVID-19, as of Aug 10, 2021, around the World and in the United States. Vaccination Rates by Country & State from Mayo Clinic

How is the Federal Government going to convince, bribe, force, or convince over 157,000,000 Americans to get vaccinated who have not done so already? vaccination rates by state

vaccination rates by state
vaccination rates by state

Just Say NO To Lockdowns, Screenings & Mask Mandates

Doctor and Senator Rand Paul video "We are at a moment of truth and a crossroads. I choose freedom". 

Nancy Reagan would be proud! 

Just Say No


How The Government Makes Twitter Censor Free Speech

Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT Ph.D. joined Stew Peters and exposed the REAL source of censorship, while addressing 'hopium', which he believes has stalled Americans from truly regaining freedom. Read his historic Twitter lawsuit filed as a result of being silenced by Twitter during his Senate election run.  

This is the first lawsuit to expose how the government censors U.S. citizens’ speech on Twitter. For years we were told Twitter acts on its own as a private company and you cannot question their decisions. Following the de-platforming of Dr.SHIVA, testimony and hearings in Federal court elicited how the government and Twitter have created an infrastructure for government to launder censorship of speech through Twitter. This website provides all documents as they emerge in this historic lawsuit. The presiding Federal Judge declared this case is one of the substantial constitutional consequences and a lawsuit that will likely become “a law school exam in Constitutional Law.”

Dr. Shiva reveals the silent Government agencies that are the censorship arm of Twitter.  Twitter simply reacts to the demands of these agencies to de-platform people who they feel are a threat to the narrative. These agencies are enabled by Democrats and Republicans as Trump created the agency and now Biden is abusing it. 

#1 - Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA - We lead the Nation’s efforts to understand and manage risk to our critical infrastructure. CISA is the Nation’s risk advisor, working with partners to defend against today’s threats and collaborating to build more secure and resilient infrastructure for the future. @CISAgov

#2 - IT-ISAC ​IT Information Sharing & Analysis Center is a non-profit corporation formed by IT companies as a specialized forum for managing risks to their corporations and the IT infrastructure. @ITISAC

Dr. Shiva called out Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump, by name, but eluded to the root of the issues, illustrating the reality that figureheads in government are constantly discussing and polarizing issues, but never really presenting a physical or realistic solution.

win back freedom

Fight For Your Freedom Against COVID Passes

This is why we should NEVER accept their use!  Join the challenge against COVID passes!

Divisive. Discriminatory. Wrong. We need YOU to join the fight against COVID passes.

Why we must stop COVID passes

The UK Government has released the NHS COVID pass and is now "strongly encouraging" businesses to restrict access using them, leading anyone from bouncers to bosses to conduct health ID checks. 

They're planning to make COVID passes mandatory - and are even threatening to make vaccine-only passes mandatory for nightclubs and universities.

COVID certificates would be the first attempt at segregation in Britain for many decades, dividing communities without reducing risks. We are in real danger of becoming a checkpoint nation.

We cannot, and will not, let this Government create a two-tier nation of division, discrimination and injustice.

Our common goal is to exit lockdown - healthy, safe and free. But we can't arrive at freedom through exclusion. 

The effect of the scheme would be to create a society where the poorest, the most marginalised, and anyone who does not comply with unprecedented demands for medical interventions could be denied basic socio-economic opportunities and afforded fewer liberties than their neighbours, colleagues and fellow citizens. 

The prospect of internal health passports signals a grave unbalancing of the relationship between not only citizens and the state but citizens and employers, business owners, managers, marshals, and anyone else dressed with authority.

The Government’s push for COVID-status certificates puts Britain in the midst of one of the greatest civil liberties battles we have faced in modern times. This is a time to stand up and take action.

Popular Posts (All Time)

Topics

5G Activist ADE Advertising Air Quality Airlines Alchohol Alex Berenson Allergic Angry Moms Antibody Antitrust Apple Apps Arizona Aspirin Astra Zeneca Australia Bankruptcy Banks Banned Bars BBB Beaches Bell's Palsy Ben Shapiro Biden Big Pharma Big Tech Bill Gates BioNTech BitChute Black Rock Blackmail Blood Clots Booster Brave Brownstone Institute Bryan Ardis Business California Canada Cancer Candace Owens Cares Act CDC Censorship Chart ChatGPT Chicago Children China Class Action Clinical Trials Closures CNN Comirnaty Conspiracy Contact Tracing Corruption Cough COVAX Cover Up Crimes Against Humanity Cult Cuomo Dan Bongino DARPA Data David Martin Deaths DeSantis Diabetes Died Suddenly Disinformation Doctor Reiner Doctors DOJ Dominion Dr Michael Yeadon Dr Reiner Dr Shiva Dr Zelenko Drugs Durability DWAC ECDC Education Election Elon Musk Email Enforcement Europe Exemptions Extortion Facebook Fact Checkers Fake Laws Fake News Fake Tests Fake Vaccine False Positive Famotidine Fauci FBI FDA Fear Mongering Federal Reserve Feds Fines Florida Flu Flu Shots Fluvoxamine Fox France Fraud Free Speech Freedom FTC Gain of Function Research Gavin Newsom Geert Vanden Bossche Genome George Soros Germany Glenn Beck Globalism Google Government Guillain-Barré Halloween Harvard Health Health Department Healthcare Heart Herd Immunity Hero HHS Hospitals How To Humor Hydroxychloroquine Hypocrisy Immune System India Inflamation Injured Insurance Investment IRS Israel Italy Ivermectin J&J Japan Jeff Bezos Jim Jordan Jobs Joe Rogan Judy Mikovits LA County Larry Elder Lawsuits Leadership Let Them Breathe Lies Loans Local Laws Lockdown Long Covid Los Angeles Mandates Map Masks Mass Hypnosis Media Medicaid Melatonin Mental Health Michigan Microsoft Minnesota Moderna Money Montana mRNA Mutation Myocarditis Nanoscience Nashville Natural Immunity NBA New Jersey New Media New York Nextstrain NFL NIH Nursing Homes NY NY Post Ohio Omicron Omricon Opinion Opposing View Oppression Outdoors Parks Passport Patents PCR Pennsylvania Pericarditis Peter McCullough Pfizer Phishing Physicians Declaration Placebo Plandemic Pneumonia Police Politics Poll Pollution PPP Prevention Pro Choice Project Veritas Protest Racism Rand Paul Real Estate Refuse Regeneron Relief Checks Remdesirvir Restaurants Restraining Order Robert Kennedy Robert Malone Ron Johnson Rudy Giuliani Rumble Russia Safegraph SBA Scams Schools Science Scott Gottlieb Senate Seniors Side Effects Sinus Social Distancing South Korea Spain Sports Stadiums Stakeholder Capitalism Stay at Home Sterilization Steve Kirsch Study Substance Abuse Surveillance Sweden Swine Flu Symptoms T Cells Taxes Teachers Technology Teslaphoresis Testing Texas Tips Tom Cotton Tony Bobulinski Transmission Treatment Tribunals Trojan Horse Trump TruthSocial Tucker Carlson Twitter Tyranny UK Unemployment United Nations Unity Project Vaccine VAERS Video Vietnam Vitamin D War Warren Buffett Washington WEF Whistleblower WHO Wisconsin Women Workers Comp Wuhan Zinc