How Many Have Been Tested for Coronavirus in the USA?

Number of People Tested for Coronavirus in the United States Chart

Number of Tests Per 1,000 for Coronavirus Chart

Total Covid-19 Test Per 1,000 People 

What can data on testing tell us about the pandemic?

Testing data provides us with two indicators of the quality of data on COVID-19

No country knows the true number of people infected with COVID-19. All we know is the infection status of those who have been tested.

The total number of people that have tested positive – the number of confirmed cases – is not the total number of people who have been infected. The true number of people infected with COVID-19 is much higher.

Whilst there is no way to infer the true number of infections from testing data, it can help give us a strong indication of the quality of a country’s data on the pandemic and an idea of how informative the number of confirmed cases in a country may be.

Testing coverage

The chart here shows a measure of testing coverage – tests per thousand people.

Countries are reporting testing data in different ways: some report the number of tests, others report the number of people tested. This distinction is important – people may be tested many times, and the number of tests a person has is likely to vary across countries.

Across different countries, we see an enormous range in testing coverage. In Iceland there have been more than 100 tests per thousand people – far more than in any other country. In Indonesia, testing coverage is very low – only 0.1 tests per thousand people.

Generally, we would expect that more testing means more reliable data on confirmed cases, for two reasons.

Firstly, a greater degree of testing provides us with a larger ‘sample’ of people for which their infection status is known. If everybody was tested, we would know the true number of people who are infected.

Secondly, it may be the case that countries with a high capacity for testing do not need to ration tests as much. Where the capacity for testing is low, tests may be reserved (or ‘rationed’) for particularly high-risk groups. Such rationing is one of the reasons that tested people are not representative of the wider population.

Popular Posts


Activist Advertising Air Quality Alchohol Antibody Antitrust Apple Apps Arizona Astra Zeneca Bankruptcy Banks Bars BBB Beaches Bell's Palsy Ben Shapiro Biden Big Pharma Bill Gates Blackmail blood clots Business California Cares Act CDC Censorship Chart Children China Class Action Closures CNN Contact Tracing Corruption Cover Up Cuomo Data Deaths Doctors DOJ Dominion Drugs Education Election Elon Musk Email Enforcement Europe Facebook Fake Laws Fake News Fake Tests Fake Vaccine False Positive Famotidine Fauci FBI FDA Fear Mongering Federal Reserve Feds Fines Florida Flu Flu Shots Fox Fraud Free Speech Freedom FTC Gavin Newsom Genome Glenn Beck Google Government Guillain-Barré Halloween Harvard Health Health Department Healthcare Heart Herd Immunity Hospitals Hydroxychloroquine Hypocrisy Insurance Investment IRS J&J Jeff Bezos Jobs Joe Rogan LA County Lawsuits Leadership Lies Loans Local Laws Lockdown Los Angeles Mammograms Map Masks Media Medicaid Melatonin Mental Health Michigan Minnesota Moderna Money mRNA Nashville New Jersey New York NFL NIH Nursing Homes NY NY Post Opinion Opposing View Oppression Outdoors Parks Passport PCR Pennsylvania Pfizer Phishing Placebo Pneumonia Politics Poll Pollution PPP Prevention Pro Choice Project Veritas Protest Racism Rand Paul Real Estate Refuse Regeneron Relief Checks Remdesirvir Restaurants Restraining Order Rudy Giuliani Safegraph SBA Scams Schools Science Senate Seniors Side Effects Sidney Powell Social Distancing South Korea Sports Stadiums Stay at Home Study Substance Abuse Surveillance Sweden Swine Flu Symptoms Taxes Teachers Technology Testing Texas Tips Tony Bobulinski Transmission Treatment Trojan Horse Trump Tucker Carlson Twitter Tyranny UK Unemployment Vaccine Video Vitamin D Warren Buffett Whistleblower WHO Wisconsin Women Workers Comp Zinc